Denton Van Zan (Reign of Fire) vs. John McClane

Started by quanchi112112 pages

Originally posted by Robtard
Ali also didn't fight highly trained mercenaries with guns, knives and explosives. He fought in a ring with a ref and rules. McClane has to deal with the law of Tooth and Claw; he done it well in four films.
The point is if McClane wins a hand to hand battle by shooting him it invalidates the fight as a crutch he needed to get him the w.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The point is if McClane wins a hand to hand battle by shooting him it invalidates the fight as a crutch he needed to get him the w.

The point is McClane's not losing to some punk with fist of cotton, no one mentioned a gun.

Now go find a proper opponent for McClane and stop masturbating Van Zan, he's not much of anything. There's an ocean of bad-asses who are above McClane; you can think of one.

Originally posted by Robtard
The point is McClane's not losing to some punk with fist of cotton, no one mentioned a gun.

Now go find a proper opponent for McClane and stop masturbating Van Zan, he's not much of anything. There's an ocean of bad-asses who are above McClane; you can think of one.

Van Zan is a dragon hunter. The guy was pure testosterone while McClane knew most of the time he's going to get his ass kicked but what the hell kinda attitude throughout all his films. I think Van Zan would beat him as badly as he did Quinn.

I can't think of anyone whose somewhat skilled in hand to hand McClane even beats tbh. He's skilled with a gun and ok at fistfighting but that's about it.

Question; do you think McClane can beat Riggs ?

So you can't come up with a proper opponent to take down McClane. Gotcha. No worries; concession accepted.

Answer: There's a thread already; you know the answer. Stop being so trollvious.

Originally posted by Robtard
So you can't come up with a proper opponent to take down McClane. Gotcha. No worries; concession accepted.

Answer: There's a thread already; you know the answer. Stop being so trollvious.

You ask for an opponent and someone else provided the link and you cry in that thread as well.

When you continue to claim bump another thread you concede the current one.

Zan wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You ask for an opponent and someone else provided the link and you cry in that thread as well.

When you continue to claim bump another thread you concede the current one.

Zan wins.

I challenged you to make a thread and give McClane a proper opponent and for you to argue a win with sustainable screen-feats; I assumed I didn't have to point out that it didn't entail a stomp in McClane's favor thread nor a Spite-Thread.

Bumping an obvious Spite-Thread is just that, more spite.

I've since given up as it's clear you're not up to the challenge and as I said, no worries. Enjoy.

Originally posted by Robtard
I challenged you to make a thread and give McClane a proper opponent and for you to argue a win with sustainable screen-feats; I assumed I didn't have to point out that it didn't entail a stomp in McClane's favor thread nor a Spite-Thread.

Bumping an obvious Spite-Thread is just that, more spite.

I've since given up as it's clear you're not up to the challenge and as I said, no worries. Enjoy.

I didn't bump any other McClane thread as I am perfectly content with seeing him lose here. Why on earth you want to see him lose another thread is beyond me.

McClane like many others have pointed out to you loses here as he's inferior in hand to hand fighting compared to someone of Zane's caliber.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I didn't bump any other McClane thread as I am perfectly content with seeing him lose here. Why on earth you want to see him lose another thread is beyond me.

McClane like many others have pointed out to you loses here as he's inferior in hand to hand fighting compared to someone of Zane's caliber.

No, you didn't do the actual bumping of the spite-thread, but that didn't stop you from wanking in it, did it.

Are you a loon or something? Where do you get "many others" from? There were five people who have their opinion on who wins in here and it was 3 for McClane and 2 for Van Zan. 2 doesn't equal "many".

Originally posted by Robtard
No, you didn't do the actual bumping of the spite-thread, but that didn't stop you from wanking in it, did it.

Are you a loon or something? Where do you get "many others" from? There were five people who have their opinion on who wins in here and it was 3 for McClane and 2 for Van Zan. 2 doesn't equal "many".

I responded in a bumped thread. You wanted me to so I gave you what you asked for and you still complained. Be careful what you ask for friend you just might get it.

Sado is a McClaniac like yourself. He can't be trusted which breaks the tie.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I responded in a bumped thread. You wanted me to so I gave you what you asked for and you still complained. Be careful what you ask for friend you just might get it.

Sado is a McClaniac like yourself. He can't be trusted which breaks the tie.

In an obvious spite-thread, which is the point and as pointed out, I didn't challenge you to a spite-thread. I said "proper", which you can't do.

Neph just said McCLane loses here cos of his perceived McClane masturbation from long ago in the MVF. His opinion was tainted, so he doesn't count either. Sorry, you lost again, bro.

Originally posted by Robtard
In an obvious spite-thread, which is the point and as pointed out, I didn't challenge you to a spite-thread. I said "proper", which you can't do.

Neph just said McCLane loses here cos of his perceived McClane masturbation from long ago in the MVF. His opinion was tainted, so he doesn't count either. Sorry, you lost again, bro.

I said I didn't bump any thread mainly because I don't see the need as I am content in not start a war against a fictional character because you want a war.

I won't sit idly by while you attack my new apprentice, The Balrog Banger.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I said I didn't bump any thread mainly because I don't see the need as I am content in not start a war against a fictional character because you want a war.

I won't sit idly by while you attack my new apprentice, The Balrog Banger.

LoL, a trollversal approach,funny, but way too obvious, you need proper training.

Neph is usually sensible and logical in here, so you don't have an apprentice, sorry. I do find it kinda odd that he'd take a Balrog cock up the ass though, but to each his own.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, a trollversal approach,funny, but way too obvious, you need proper training.

Neph is usually sensible and logical in here, so you don't have an apprentice, sorry. I do find it kinda odd that he'd take a Balrog cock up the ass though, but to each his own.

It sounds trolle to demand I go bump other McClane threads tbh.

Neph agrees with me so you agree you respect his opinion therefore Van Zan wins.

Hey respect neph for who he is and if he is intrigued by mythical balrogs it's his business.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Sado is a McClaniac like yourself. He can't be trusted which breaks the tie.

Nah. No defamation required.

Im more than capable of admitting that McClane loses when he actually does, which obviously isnt the case here.

Yer big Van Zanboy. 😉

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Nah. No defamation required.

Im more than capable of admitting that McClane loses when he actually does, which obviously isnt the case here.

Yer big Van Zanboy. 😉

Then admit it here and all will be forgiven.

You'd forgive me for lying?

That wouldn't do...

McSheen would totally beat Van Zan Mueller.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
You'd forgive me for lying?

That wouldn't do...

McSheen would totally beat Van Zan Mueller.

McClane would realize and early on hey this isn't a die hard movie there isn't a gun to bail me out.

Originally posted by quanchi112
McClane would realize and early on hey this isn't a die hard movie there isn't a gun to bail me out.

We've seen several times what happens when McClane loses his gun or runs out of bullets; his opponents are left in ruin nonetheless.

Originally posted by quanchi112
McClane would realize and early on hey this isn't a die hard movie there isn't a gun to bail me out.

Character capabilities would withstand. On screen feats.
He'll not need a gun against that 'girly slap' thrower Van Zan.

Originally posted by Robtard
We've seen several times what happens when McClane loses his gun or runs out of bullets; his opponents are left in ruin nonetheless.
Yes, due to the fact he's the hero and will win not because he's an uber badass. You know this to be true, roberto.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Character capabilities would withstand. On screen feats.
He'll not need a gun against that 'girly slap' thrower Van Zan.
Don't speak about Zan in such disrespectful fashion. His headbutts were the stuff of legend.