The Strongest There Is

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ By that token then, which isn't unreasonable since you're just taking the feats at face value, Ultraman should undeniably be the strongest then. You could have just read the comic itself that stated Flash was running at near light speeds.

The comic was lowballing; the point I was trying to male was that just because you attach numbers to things, doesn't take it less silly. Focussing solely on numbers at the expense of the text is not correct. Thank you for backing me up.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Ok, so by your admission, its quantifiable. Has anyone else lifted half of infinity then?

So we are.all agreed then, as per the stips, Ultraman wins...I have carver and quanchi both on the same side, I pity those who disagree....

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
The comic was lowballing; the point I was trying to male was that just because you attach numbers to things, doesn't take it less silly. Focussing solely on numbers at the expense of the text is not correct. Thank you for backing me up.

Comic says quite clearly that Flash ran at just under light speed.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
So we are.all agreed then, as per the stips, Ultraman wins...I have carver and quanchi both on the same side, I pity those who disagree....

[QUOTE=13679493]Originally posted by OneDumbG0
I hardly think that Justice League comic held an irrational resentment towards the Flash character and decided to intentionally misinterpret his feat out of spite.

Comic says quite clearly that Flash ran at just under lightt speed. [/QUOTE

]

Just like the other comic clearly states tge book had infinite pages.

The JLA comic also clearly states the distance he travelled, and the time taken.

Again, my point is that relying solely on numbers, like I did for the JLA comic, is incorrect. You need to read the text as well. Thanks forbacking me up.

^ I don't see the parallel. Nobody had to go through torturous mathematics to get to the conclusion that the book had infinite pages. It was stated that the book had "infinite pages."

And it was stated that Flash was running just "at a hair's breadth short of the speed of light" and at "near light travel."

Sometimes it's just easier to read the comic.

Could have been a Kindle device... connected to the cloud. "infinite pages".

Originally posted by janus77
Could have been a Kindle device... connected to the cloud. "infinite pages".

Originally posted by Sr J-Bieb
Has anyone ever told you how smart you are

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ I don't see the parallel. Nobody had to go through torturous mathematics to get to the conclusion that the book had infinite pages. It was stated that the book had "infinite pages."

And it was stated that Flash was running just "at a hair's breadth short of the speed of light" and at "near light travel."

Sometimes it's just easier to read the comic.

Agreed. You and I are both singing from the same hymn sheet.

So Hulk won this?

Superman

Originally posted by biensalsa
Superman

Originally posted by quanchi112
You honestly think he's stronger than the Hulk ?

He said based on feats

Hulk is POTENTIALLY stronger

Superman again

Originally posted by biensalsa
He said based on feats

Hulk is POTENTIALLY stronger

Superman again

Not this thread again...

Originally posted by quanchi112
What feats ? Arguing anything feat based as to determining superiority is ridiculous anyway.

Umm what?

How else would you do it?

Granted, portrayal matters a lot as well, but when two characters have never faced each other or even been compared to one another within a story, you HAVE to go by feats.

Originally posted by quanchi112
What feats ? Arguing anything feat based as to determining superiority is ridiculous anyway.

Ahem! READ PLEASE

Originally posted by Damborgson
Who based on feats is the strongest hero there is in both universes Marvel and DC? When I say strength I mean lifting/pushing/locking arms/ etc...no striking feats.

Oh! and this?

Arguing anything feat based as to determining superiority is ridiculous anyway. [/QUOTE]

I have seen you using "feats" to defend your favorite hero, so "feats" are not "ridiculous" when is for your favorite character, but they are "ridiculous" for Superman?

That is called double standard mate!!!

I guess this is the reason why you use this

http://s201.photobucket.com/albums/aa41/quanchi112/Images/?action=view&current=Thorset5benergyfeatetc.jpg

That is yours, so are you using feats???

Originally posted by CosmicComet
Umm what?

How else would you do it?

Granted, portrayal matters a lot as well, but when two characters have never faced each other or even been compared to one another within a story, you HAVE to go by feats.

Originally posted by biensalsa
Ahem! READ PLEASE

Oh! and this?

[B]Arguing anything feat based as to determining superiority is ridiculous anyway.

I have seen you using "feats" to defend your favorite hero, so "feats" are not "ridiculous" when is for your favorite character, but they are "ridiculous" for Superman?

That is called double standard mate!!! [/B][/QUOTE] What are you talking about ? I argue primarily based on how these characters match up. You won't see me using the Midgard Serpent as proof of Thor's strength.