Originally posted by quanchi112
She won't kill him which will cost her the battle.
He can't hit her. She blows him against the wall continuously or snaps her fingers and moves a rock into his head.
Realistically she can bend him like a twig.
Originally posted by Lestov16
The virtue of the digestive tract
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
She won't kill him which will cost her the battle. Concession accepted. Poppins would be dead in reign of fire. She'd be singing while dragons would burn right up her skirt.
"Renowned wuss Denton Van Zan, is reincarnated back to 'Reign of Fire' pre-dragon-faeces-form, to face down in a gritty confrontation with Scary Mary Poppins for a good old KMC dust up.
Both meet on the streets of London."
[The OP]
Do you see any mention of live dragons roaming the streets?
Originally posted by the ninjakIt isn't in her nature to kill so the moment she lets off in character he ends her.
He can't hit her. She blows him against the wall continuously or snaps her fingers and moves a rock into his head.
Realistically she can bend him like a twig.😂
Originally posted by siriuswriterThat's why he does her in. He's obsessed with his mission and she doesn't kill. I feel bad but for her to win you'd have to change her character.
"Renowned wuss Denton Van Zan, is reincarnated back to 'Reign of Fire' pre-dragon-faeces-form, to face down in a gritty confrontation with Scary Mary Poppins for a good old KMC dust up.Both meet on the streets of London."
[The OP]
Do you see any mention of live dragons roaming the streets?
Originally posted by quanchi112
It isn't in her nature to kill so the moment she lets off in character he ends her. That's why he does her in. He's obsessed with his mission and she doesn't kill. I feel bad but for her to win you'd have to change her character.
Originally posted by Lestov16
JUST so it is clear, even if quanchi's argument of Mary not killing him has any form of validity, that still means that, if they were to go up against each other with morals off, she would curbstomp him like her name is Edward Norton. Therefore, in a "true" battle not limited by morals, she would win, basically meaning that in th coverall topic of Van Zan and Mary Poppins, she is the true winner and Zan would only walk away alive (even if she isn't bloodlusted, I'd highly doubt that that means that she is just going to stand there like an idiot and not defend herself,) in a stalemate, and only because she is being merciful. That is all
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Indeed. 🙂
I don't think Quan understands the gravity of the situation.
-She can click her fingers and move any amount (no limit) objects in the area in any way she wishes.
-She can create any object she wants, but she can't use that here but it is a nice display of matter manip.
-She can create worlds around her where all the inhabitants adore her.
-She can create concentrated winds at will that can either-
a-Blow humans away.
b-Float her enough to show absolute control of wind manip.
He's just a thug with delusions of granduer. And she has more granduer than most fictional characters I can think of. But she's cool enough to not flaunt it because she is an enlightened being with the powers of an god who seeks purpose through helping lesser people.
Van Zan doesn't deserve her help and has no class therefore either-
-His head ends up in a wall.
-Any object in the nearby vacinity ends up in his head.
-He gets brutally torn apart by cartoon characters in another world while she watches and drinks tea.
It's spite of the most massive proportions. Mary will make Van Zan cry in terror. And make him beg for forgiveness.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan doesn't throw in the towel. The movie makes it clear he won't stop until his opponent is dead and since she won't kill him she eventually loses.
Well then he will be rendered incapable of thought after she is done with him.
One way or another Zan can't net a single win out of ten against Poppins.
I've supplied my reasons. You now have to show reasons why none of them will work. Which I don't see happening considering the only argument Zan has is his urge to act hardcore and fight no matter what. It simply isn't enough compared to the evidence I've shown.
Poppins 10/10. With ease. He craps his pants and begs for forgiveness once he witnesses Mary's power.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan doesn't throw in the towel. The movie makes it clear he won't stop until his opponent is dead
So basically he is going to pull a "kids-picking-on-Liz-from-Hellboy stunt" and get her mad enough to kill him.
Originally posted by quanchi112
since she won't kill him she eventually loses.
In order for the latter part of that to occur, Zan needs something he doesn't happen to have in this situation. A way to kill her. He doesn't know how. There is no prep. She won't kill him, but she will defend herself, and hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. You seem to be under the impression that having a good tactical sense of killing dragons makes him omniscient. In that case you would be YouTube video
Originally posted by the ninjakZan never craps his pants but when Mary sees the determination in his eyes her will will break. She won't kill him and he doesn't give up. Stated in the film. Zan wins.
Well then he will be rendered incapable of thought after she is done with him.One way or another Zan can't net a single win out of ten against Poppins.
I've supplied my reasons. You now have to show reasons why none of them will work. Which I don't see happening considering the only argument Zan has is his urge to act hardcore and fight no matter what. It simply isn't enough compared to the evidence I've shown.
Poppins 10/10. With ease. He craps his pants and begs for forgiveness once he witnesses Mary's power.
Originally posted by Lestov16She isn't ruthless enough for the win. Zan is.
So basically he is going to pull a "kids-picking-on-Liz-from-Hellboy stunt" and get her mad enough to kill him.In order for the latter part of that to occur, Zan needs something he doesn't happen to have in this situation. A way to kill her. He doesn't know how. There is no prep. She won't kill him, but she will defend herself, and hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. You seem to be under the impression that having a good tactical sense of killing dragons makes him omniscient. In that case you would be YouTube video
Originally posted by quanchi112
Zan never craps his pants but when Mary sees the determination in his eyes her will will break. She won't kill him and he doesn't give up. [B]Stated in the film.
Originally posted by quanchi112
She isn't ruthless enough for the win. Zan is.
To quote Kevin Sandusky, What the hell does that even mean?