Originally posted by RobtardWhat foe burned up when they touched the Balrog ?
LoL. If someone watched the film and paid attention, he would have seen that when Gandalf was fighting the Balrog and riding it during the free-fall, he no longer had his staff and he didn't burn.His protection from fire isn't due to his staff. Watch the film; then comment. Stop embarrassing yourself, it's 2012 now, I know you can do it.
It was an ok movie. I kinda expected it to be more godly meaning they showed more of the god side, their powers and their wrath towards man but I guess they will never to that'?? Remember xena, when see killed all the greek gods? Well most of then, something like that I thought would happen?
Originally posted by quanchi112
I get that but it didn't burn anyone up.
You can try your clown-angle of "we never saw it burn, so it can't", which ignores the known fact that Gandalf didn't burn because he has some manner of resistance to fire(seen twice in the films) and any idiot knows that fire and glowing molten lava is hot.
It's still January, it's way too early to set a precedent-of-fail for yourself, try harder, okay?
Originally posted by RobtardIf you make a claim that people burn up you need to prove it. You just say random things you can't prove and it has to stop. That's probably why you scurry away for long periods of time in between responses.
You can try your clown-angle of "we never saw it burn, so it can't", which ignores the known fact that Gandalf didn't burn because he has some manner of resistance to fire(seen twice in the films) and any idiot knows that fire and glowing molten lava is hot.It's still January, it's way too early to set a precedent-of-fail for yourself, try harder, okay?
Originally posted by Robtard
You can try your clown-angle of "we never saw it burn, so it can't", which ignores the known fact that Gandalf didn't burn because he has some manner of resistance to fire(seen twice in the films) and any idiot knows that fire and glowing molten lava is hot.It's still January, it's way too early to set a precedent-of-fail for yourself, try harder, okay?
Good ole troll tactic #142, the Reversal of Blame, brilliant.
Originally posted by RobtardI am not saying it can't or won't burn but just set an entire body on fire needs to be proven.
The obvious doesn't have to be proved, genius. If you want to claim a visibly sharp sword can't cut, you prove it; not the other way around where the sharp sword can't cut unless proven.Good ole troll tactic #142, the Reversal of Blame, brilliant.
Originally posted by quanchi112
If you can't back up your claims then don't make 'em.
Originally posted by Robtard
You can try your clown-angle of "we never saw it burn, so it can't", which ignores the known fact that Gandalf didn't burn because he has some manner of resistance to fire(seen twice in the films) and any idiot knows that fire and glowing molten lava is hot.It's still January, it's way too early to set a precedent-of-fail for yourself, try harder, okay?
Originally posted by Robtard
The obvious doesn't have to be proved, genius. If you want to claim a visibly sharp sword can't cut, you prove it; not the other way around where the sharp sword can't cut unless proven.