Anyway, my point with bringing up these videos is demonstrating actual limits across various showings. And to show how much your calc COMPLETELY flies in the face of the entirety of the series' visual demonstrations of limitations within the canon. It's a joke. To say you are disregarding proportionality, would be a vast understatement. Kain claims as late as even Defiance that he has a weakness to water (like most other vampires), and is inflicted negatively by Moebius' staff the same as any other vampire...and yet...he is the only vampire that can tank a nuke according to you. Brilliant. 🙂 Your claim's strength depends on your capability to completely handwave every showing not to your liking (in which there's A LOT. This verse is not feat heavy by ANY stretch of the imagination) as disregardable low showings (and certain things can be, to be fair), refusing to come to an average, sticking only to a clear high demonstration, and then distorting the f*ck out of that high showing with a non-sensical calc--not only that, you will THEN turn around and focus and try to embellish what would be low showings in OTHER rival characters(as seen with Ghirahim and Bowser threads). This is standard fare in fan-debates, but you definitely take it to the highest level of despicability that I've personally seen. I don't think it gets any worse than your demonstrations. But apparently, I'M the one with issues of 'blindness' and 'bias'. right.
You realize how crazy a ****ing slippery slope this whole thing creates. If Raz's claws are creating 800x earth core pressure on his claw tips, how could Kain even kick that lock and it not shatter immediately? How could Raz even tip over that obelisk without his claws piercing right in their bottom with his hundreds of times earth core durability having claws? How could Raz and Kain even pull around those large blocks without them simply pulling chunks out of them--seeing as they sure as hell won't be durable enough to offer resistance for their backwards curvature claws when they are pulling back (would be like trying to pull a very large cake with your fingers stuck in them). Perhaps the lock and obelisk were made of something really tough like neutronium! Perhaps that's why they weren't pierced! And as for the blocks not getting chunks ripped out of 'em? Eh. Surely you can chalk this up as an 'acceptable break from reality'. But wait! The lock and the obelisk CAN'T be made of neutronium as they would weigh like quadrillions of tons and sink into the Earth's core. 🙂 And as for 'acceptable break from reality'? Well that would be all fine and well, but unfortunately you are trying to use REAL numbers and compare them to known phenomena from REALITY, just to appraise what ONE feat could translate to in REALITY. Therefore, f*ck that, you get no courtesy with such blatant hypocrisy. 🙂
Face it genius, the calc falls flat on its face entirely. It was a brand new toy for you, and you paraded around with it, but unfortunately no one was impressed by it. And this metaphorical toy might as well have been something made of soft clay. As people can metaphorically snatch it out of your hands, pull out chunks from it, and make their own little toys from it to mock you. 🙂 Which is exactly what has happened here; HEY GUYS! Star Core pressure per square meter for any character of at least class 20 strength, human level speed, and a bladed weapon thinner than Raz's claws! Whoop Whoop! 🙂
Calcs are nice and all, when they are provably consistent with the canon, this wasn't. Let it go. Let it die. Even Amy Hennig
would find your claims to be the ravings of a delusional mad man.
This was over the moment I posted the Air Reaver video, since it is meant to be a feat that is vital for plot progession, as Raziel needed its level of power to proceed, and it happens in the same game that Kain supposedly has this supposed 'star core pressure durability per meter'. lol.
Now. As for the whole event that started all of this, let us address it. Raziel did NOT hurt Kain only once. He hurt him TWICE. He actually hurt him THREE times before SR2's opening retold and the ending of SR1 which it obviously picked up from.
Let's post it all the relevant confrontations first for everyone to see again.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LulD2kar9I
^3:50-3:57. Raziel strikes Kain, and Kain screams out in pain and grabs his face. That's hurting someone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENosWOAWUgo
^5:05-5:35. SR1's ending. Kain walks away into the time stream limping from his fight with Raziel. But this is of course
Retconned by this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4S1i5-F8Sg&feature=related
^Obviously, the intro of Soul Reaver 2 retold Soul Reaver 1's ending, and thus it acted as a retcon. Here Kain does not
limp away hurt, but gets away unscathed despite taking 3 hits from Raziel.
And of course the infamous Defiance fight:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByYWsAcTX3Y
^Raziel slashes at Kain with the wraith blade, and then proceeds to rip the Heart of Darkness out of Kain.
Firstly, let's address the Soul Reaver 2 intro, as this is the event that you derived this whole crazy durability level for Kain. For this intro, you are stretching the usage of the word retcon. It retcons what it directly conflicts with, and nothing more. Thus all it does is retcon's SR1's ending. The first fight from SR1, where Raziel clearly makes Kain groan in pain, is completely in-tact until proven otherwise. Raziel recalls their first fight in SR2, how Kain broke the 'Blood' Reaver against him at the end of it, and that is exactly what happened and as such seeing as we have no other information about the fight, its portrayal stays in-tact. You are trying to create a contradiction where there isn't explicitly one at all; Kain didn't grunt in pain from Raziel's few seconds of attack whereas he did grunt in pain at the end of the first SR1 fight. All I would have to say in regards to you trying to create some big contradiction between the two, is that the first SR1 fight surely took place longer than a few seconds. That is the only justification I would have to make.
The SR2 fight, did NOT suddenly 'retcon kain's durability' to a higher level. No. Who's interpretation is the more sound one between mine and yours? Mine is. Because it only addresses what is there to see, and thus it is the simpler explanation. Yours, is more convuluted and seeks to spread whatever supposed new knowledge was gained, across multiple spans of the past and when rewound back to what the implications could mean, it simply does not hold up. Your explanation holds more assumptions, thus it has a higher likelihood of failure.
Raziel manages to make Kain groan in pain from his claws in one fight, and doesn't manage to do so in the few seconds of attack from a future fight. No contradiction. Nothing here that alters the flow of the history/story or anything like that. They were simply two different fights, and they played out differently. Nothing more, nothing less. My explanation is simpler. Occam's Razor wins again. No retcon between SR2's intro and SR1's first kain fight.