Originally posted by country1000
You will get the picture soon enough, just watch.
I've been around here long enough to know where this is going.
Basically, you feel Gladiator is - somehow ermm - stronger than Thor, Hulk, and Superman, based primarily, if not solely off of Gladiator busting a planet.
When confronted by feats and instances displaying strength far greater than that needed to destroy a planet, for example, Superman lifting infinite weight, you then decide to have a feat war in which highs aren't the measuring stick, but rather, low feats and showings, specifically those centered around these characters failing to do something or needed help to do it.
Which, I guess, will somehow prove a point...in spite of the fact that Superman and Thor have more impressive feats of them cementing their strength class and a more consistent basis of doing so, to say nothing of specific amps and upgrades (mostly in Superman's case) which need to be taken into effect as he has literally gotten stronger as the years progress.
In other words, you're desperately trying to concoct a scenario in which Gladiator looks better on paper than Superman or Thor did at least once, which will, I guess, vindicate you and your belief that Gladiator is "the strongest one there is".
Am I right so far?
Originally posted by abhilegendOk. superman and others failed to keep the earth in orbit, superman needed thors hammer to bust open something, he needed help to move a moon and a planet, Yet he has infinite strength?? The point is ( jake ) is that he has hundreds of canon feats that shows that he is not mr infinite strength.
^ Ok. You first.
Originally posted by country1000
Ok. superman and others failed to keep the earth in orbit, superman needed thors hammer to bust open something, he needed help to move a moon and a planet, Yet he has infinite strength?? The point is ( jake ) is that he has hundreds of canon feats that shows that he is not mr infinite strength.
Yeah, and Gladiator has more showings of him not busting planets with his blows than he does in doing so (which was one time).
The point is you shouldn't desperately cling onto a single feat as the gospel and use that as evidence that Character A is stronger than Character B. You should use their entire history and feats as an average, in which case, Superman, Thor, Hulk, etc. are superior to Gladiator.
Which gets us back to the main point: Gladiator not being the strongest person here physically.
Originally posted by abhilegendSorry dude, but your job is to show me gladiator failing at lifting something or destroying something to make him weaker than superman. Nice scans though. My job is to show superman failing.
Me firstAnd this proves superman>>>>gladiator. I mean he busted a giant rock with a single punch.uhuh
Originally posted by country1000
Ok. superman and others failed to keep the earth in orbit, superman needed thors hammer to bust open something, he needed help to move a moon and a planet, Yet he has infinite strength?? The point is ( jake ) is that he has hundreds of canon feats that shows that he is not mr infinite strength.
Context. He was just resurrected after getting killed 3000 years earlier so obviously he was weaker, they were moving moon at very high speeds and were resisted by every magical hero on earth so that moon doesn't go in earth's orbit. He was moving earth with a harness against the power of starbreaker who is grown up sun eater(a sun eater is just a larva compared to him), he needed mjolnir to break Krona's force-field who punked the most powerful artifacts in MU and DCU and has power of several universes he absorbed. How's any of that is a low feat?
Originally posted by country1000
Sorry dude, but your job is to show me gladiator failing at lifting something or destroying something to make him weaker than superman. Nice scans though. My job is to show superman failing.
Where did superman fail in lifting something? Grunting isn't failing. BTW you didn't provide any scans. Gladiator and thor went to hell trying to stop a plane (although they were trying to stop it tearing apart). Gladiator also failed to break uni-powered Sue's force-fields.
http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt349/zauriel1988/shadowmoonfeat.jpg Was he smiling here?
Originally posted by JakeTheBankGladiator rammed into ego at near light speed, but he did not ko himself. And if superman has to build up speed and mass to destroy a small moon, then yes, gladiators planet smashing feat places him above superman. I wish to god that superman had destroyed that planet and gladiator koed himself ramming a moon. You and others would run into the ground and make that planet bigger than the sun.
Does that one feat concerning the Shadow Moon make Superman weaker than Gladiator according to Gladiator's one time planet busting feat? Superman also rammed into the moon going close to light speed and didn't stand on the surface wailing on it.
Originally posted by country1000
Put up the scan where he tried that on that moon which is larger than a meteor and lets look at his face.
That was Mcduffie superman who was oneshotted by Dr. Light. Here superman busted a moon in a single strike.
Hell even supergirl has busted a moon at 99.8% of speed of light.
Just think about it, a superman who was written by a writer who thought T'challa can armbar surfer and get beaten by a single shot from Dr. Light can bust a shadow moon who is travelling at very high speeds then what can he do in hands of a writer like Greg pak.scared
Originally posted by country1000
Gladiator rammed into ego at near light speed, but he did not ko himself. And if superman has to build up speed and mass to destroy a small moon, then yes, gladiators planet smashing feat places him above superman. I wish to god that superman had destroyed that planet and gladiator koed himself ramming a moon. You and others would run into the ground and make that planet bigger than the sun.
So, basically, you want to lowball Superman and others while simultaneously clinging to Gladiator's seldom high end feats and then strawman people who believe (rightfully so) that Gladiator isn't the strongest high herald out there?
Originally posted by abhilegendSuperman flew through that moon, he did not bust it ( nice try though ) So far you have shown me metors and small moons. When you get to planets and asteriods blocking space lanes, let me know. Good night people, be safe.
That was Mcduffie superman who was oneshotted by Dr. Light. Here superman busted a moon in a single strike.Hell even supergirl has busted a moon at 99.8% of speed of light.
Just think about it, a superman who was written by a writer who thought T'challa can armbar surfer and get beaten by a single shot from Dr. Light can bust a shadow moon who is travelling at very high speeds then what can he do in hands of a writer like Greg pak.scared
Originally posted by country1000
Superman flew through that moon, he did not bust it ( nice try though ) So far you have shown me metors and small moons. When you get to planets and asteriods blocking space lanes, let me know. Good night people, be safe.
And what did he do on that shadow moon? He koed himself on it and supergirl destroyed one without getting koed, so that means supergirl is more powerful than superman, right? Planets, I can do that
