Originally posted by carver9
Hahahahahahahahaha... 😂 😂 ... I didn't even do anything. I am asking him if he is talking about me because if he is he is wrong since I don't even use the speed blitz argument with Gladiator.
Of course you do, Mister nanosecond.
Not to mention the amount of times you've brought up that once scene from War of Kings were Gladiator blitzes people.
Originally posted by carver9
I can't believe Bada reported me. This seems like his kind of work. 😉
He didn't report you. I just seem to run in to lunacy every time i come on this site.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
It's not even the ignoring part that is inexplicable to me. That's just an automatic reflex of butthurt Thor haters.It's the complete focus on the highest feats of Superman as the only thing being representative of Superman's speed.
It's the complete focus on the lowest feats of Thor as the only thing being representative of Thor's speed. Which would be more forgivable... if Superman somehow never had his share of low and embarrassing feats. But he does.
So somehow, it's ok pretending that Superman never has low feats like being completely blitzed by a mid tier street-leveler below Lady Shiva.
And then this is topped off by acting like all the Marvel speedsters that Thor actually deals with somehow has nothing to do with Thor's reflexes. The only assumption that can be permitted is that they never used speed against Thor. Whereas with superbricks Superman has faced... somehow Superman has always used his speed against them
If people were being at all fair about this, you'd stack up the highest speed feats against each other (maybe take out the one or two outliers for both sides). You'd ignore the lowest speed feats and make that a wash. You wouldn't arbitrarily decide that one company somehow writes all their superspeedsters as never using speed against Thor or the vice-versa, that Superman always uses his speed against superbricks.
If you did that, you'd rationally conclude that Thor deals with speedblitzes better than Darkseid, Lobo, General, Doomsday, etc. Because he undeniably has a greater number of independent speed feats and has dealt with more speedsters consistently.
How do people avoid that conclusion and pretend like Thor would get speedblitzed worse? That he gets speedblitzes so badly that Superman would have an eternity to beat Thor before he knows what's happening? To the extent that you literally peddle the notion that Superman could beat thousands of Thors (cuz that's how bad the difference in speed is)?????
This make NO SENSE. A KMC forum fight should have at least some remote semblance to what occurs in comics -- despite all the protestations that forum fights work different, they should find some grounded reality in what we see in comics. Has ANYBODY ever seen Superman wreck a Thor-like character so badly that it was almost an eternity to Superman? That if he really went all out bloodlusted, some good Superman writer will write a scene where he wrecks 1,000 Thor-like characters before they even know what happens on-panel?
FFS. Does this absurdity not astound people?
Originally posted by carver9
Post the scan where they are at the sun and Max Lord say "begin recording". Naah, you don't have too...give me the issue number and I will do it.
He was ordering brother eye to record his babbling as shown here
As he says that the fight lasted 1 minute and 54 seconds from start to finish. When did brother eye started tracking their fight, oh yeah from the start.
Learn to read comics, carv.
