Re: Re: Who is more durable HP Doomsday or WWH
Originally posted by h1a8
IMO DD is significantly more durable than WWH. He is more durable than Superman and Superman is more durable than WWH. This isn't a good thread by any means.If you want reasons then try the OE.
Hulk withstood an attack from Galactus during secret wars. What's your point? Hulk was in the heart of an attack that laid waste to a non 616 universe. So again, what's your point.?
Originally posted by KingD19
The simplest and easiest way to put this is that Doomsday has higher durability, while the Hulk has a higher damage soak/healing factor.
I disagree with this notiion. How can WBH have a greater healing factor when H/P DD can come back from the dead and was instantly healing himself from injuries.
H/P DD is more durable and has a greater healing factor than WBH.
WWH got absolutely shredded by adamantium bullets until he was basically a standing puddle of goop. He healed.
He got phased into the ground, had his organs and bones destroyed by stone being fused with his molecular structure. He healed.
Doomsday has reincarnation, and a healing factor, but did he suffer extreme injuries like Hulk?
And wasn't his healing basically him rapidly becoming immune to whatever it was that effected him, so healing occured because of his auto-immunity? If you've got a broken arm, and your arm can no longer be broken, then it'll be better.
Originally posted by Diesldude
I disagree with this notiion. How can WBH have a greater healing factor when H/P DD can come back from the dead and was instantly healing himself from injuries.H/P DD is more durable and has a greater healing factor than WBH.
He died which means his durability isn't on Hulks level. Hulk has withstood some powerful sh** and his healing factor kept him in the game. Hulk durability is just better. Doomsday has better piercing damage though.