Originally posted by carver9
Lol...you are confusing the HELL out of me.
Lol how so?
Excluding 'HF' from 'durability', Doomsday is more 'durable'.
If we include it as part of the durability measure, Hulk is more 'durable'. Like Wolverine, its been his healing factor which has kept him in fights - for example, healing damage faster than Wolverine can dish out. I wouldn't count it as part of his durability, however, as you would then throw up things like Wolverine being more durable than Superman.
Originally posted by DarkSaint85
Not really.Doomsday was bloodied by Superman. But Orion, Doomsday, Martian Manhunter, Wonder Woman couldn't.
WWH was bloodied by Thing.
Ergo, Doomsday's durability against punches (which is the most common method of fighting it seems in comics) is greater than the Hulk's.
Against piercing damage, we have already agreed Doomsday's durability>Hulk's.
Against energy blasts, I pick Doomsday again.
So in conclusion, Doomsday's durability>Hulk.
So why would you post this when I agreed with you in the first place. Posting something like this against Carver9 is opening yourself up for another post from me... a defensive post.
Originally posted by carver9
So why would you post this when I agreed with you in the first place. Posting something like this against Carver9 is opening yourself up for another post from me... a defensive post.
Lol it was in response to your assertion that the thread was pointless.
Its not pointless, as long as you set definitions as to what we mean by durability. And I guess it wasn't pointless as it made you realise that HF is separate from durability....