Who is more durable HP Doomsday or WWH

I think this all depends upon what you would call decay/wear/damage. For instance, having your whole flesh ripped from your bones is painful to Hulk, but it lasts a panel at best and it has no effect whatsoever. So how would you see that as damage?

Does it look bad? ofcourse. Does it take Hulk out of the fight? not even close.

Punch a hole right through his chest and spine, it'll take a panel to repair it. It won't prevent him from launching an assault. It won't affect his capabilities at all.

Doomsday is more likely to be affected by such "injuries" than Hulk, thus WWH is the more durable, imo.

Originally posted by DarkSaint85
I asked this exact same question. Then of course, there is also Warpath using his knives. Warpath with knives < Superman with Motherbox lightsabre, but that's just me. I'm not arguing with you carver, am just pointing things out.

Of course every feat of WWH would be high end - it was a short 5 issue storyline where he was meant to go up against the biggest and baddest MArvel had to offer.

Superman>Thing so....not sure what your point is....

Good, because I wasn't trying to. Although I sometimes prove things without trying....

Like so lol. So are we including HF with durability? I was under the impression we weren't, but that's just me.

It's not hard to make Hulk bleed...the hard thing is keeping the blood there...bypassing.his healing factor.

Doomsday still bleeds which is my point. It's easier to make Hulk bleed though.

I want you to try and debate against me...I owe you from another thread where you proved me wrong on something.

I'M including healing factor because it is part of his durability.

Originally posted by carver9
It's not hard to make Hulk bleed...the hard thing is keeping the blood there...bypassing.his healing factor.

Doomsday still bleeds which is my point. It's easier to make Hulk bleed though.

I want you to try and debate against me...I owe you from another thread where you proved me wrong on something.

I'M including healing factor because it is part of his durability.

Originally posted by Stoic
Doomsday at base is more durable, but as the Hulk gains strength, he would be far more durable than Doomsday.

I would pay to some cash to see a crossover between Hulk and Doomsday. A long, extended fight.

Definitely... Sending letter to editors now and praying for mass carnage crossover event. potentially a mini-series with another run a few years later when doomsday returns having >>> adaptations...

Originally posted by janus77
I think this all depends upon what you would call decay/wear/damage. For instance, having your whole flesh ripped from your bones is painful to Hulk, but it lasts a panel at best and it has no effect whatsoever. So how would you see that as damage?

Does it look bad? ofcourse. Does it take Hulk out of the fight? not even close.

Punch a hole right through his chest and spine, it'll take a panel to repair it. It won't prevent him from launching an assault. It won't affect his capabilities at all.

Doomsday is more likely to be affected by such "injuries" than Hulk, thus WWH is the more durable, imo.

I agree in that it doesn't take him out of the fight - but imo that isn't 'durability' in the sense that his body is unaffected by attacks. His body IS affected by the attacks, its his healing factor which keeps him in the fight, and someone else has already posted the example with Wolverine's slashes healing up faster than they can be doled out.

I guess our definitions of 'durability' differ. I wouldn't count HF as a part of durability, some of you obviously do.

Originally posted by carver9
I would pay to some cash to see a crossover between Hulk and Doomsday. A long, extended fight.

Originally posted by carver9
Thanos thought Mar-vell could kill him...end of story which makes me believe Thanos isn't unkillable. Dialog for the win.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos knew him attempting to bring Thanos to his death would actually cause his downfall. Thanos only feigned submission to bring about his and the ruination of the universe.

Originally posted by carver9
Let me get all of this taken care of. WWH withstands a punch that had the equivalent of 100 trillion tons of force and he tanked more of this during this same fight. 100 TRILLION freaking tons of force. You will NEVER find anything resembling this with blunt force.

http://m980.photobucket.com/albumview/albums/ankur2292/IncredibleHulk611009.jpg.html?o=81

Next..

WWH (while just getting his powers drained by Rulk) withstands a punch that was so powerful the punch itself created a nuclear explosion. Again, you will never find anything like this...EVER, from the Doomsday camp. Blunt force...WWH has him beat in spades.

http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/8339/hulk2401718.jpg
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6448/hulk24019.jpg
http://img826.imageshack.us/img826/4844/hulk24020.jpg

^Pretty sure the guardian attack was because he had adapted to it....and so it didnt affect him and hence not necessarilly a straight durability feat.

Originally posted by Naija boy
^Pretty sure the guardian attack was because he had adapted to it....and so it didnt affect him and hence not necessarilly a straight durability feat.

Originally posted by Naija boy
^Pretty sure the guardian attack was because he had adapted to it....and so it didnt affect him and hence not necessarilly a straight durability feat.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Doomsday laughed at the attack equivalent to 10 million nukes which when calculated brings roughly the same results. Even pre-DOS doomsday took a guardian's suicide blast without any discomfort, the same attack atomized SBP.

Guess you don't know the difference between blunt force and energy attacks. My scans showed blunt force, your comments are about energy attacks...not the same thing buddy, try again.

Originally posted by Nihilist
After Marvell had plunged the sword through his chest, after death killed Marvell... Thanos was fine and had no injury.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Doomsday laughed at the attack equivalent to 10 million nukes which when calculated brings roughly the same results. Even pre-DOS doomsday took a guardian's suicide blast without any discomfort, the same attack atomized SBP.

That said attack ripped a hole through space, IIRC.

Originally posted by Prep-Man
That said attack ripped a hole through space, IIRC.

Originally posted by carver9
Guess you don't know the difference between blunt force and energy attacks. My scans showed blunt force, your comments are about energy attacks...not the same thing buddy, try again.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Which attack? On doomsday or SBP?

The Guardian attack on Doomsday.