Originally posted by JBL
So we should ignore that direct comparison scene and use feats that appear to make someone faster than the other? That scene focused on who was faster reflex wise and also told who was faster in raw speed. WW also has a shattered god feat that is far above supermans feats, non comparing feats do not tell us how fast the characters are moving and leave one to guess and we see what fans do when guessing. Until it is stated on panel in a direct comparison that superman is equal to or faster than ww in reflex speed by any DC writer be it feat wise or statement by trustworthy characters, WW is as it stand, is faster because of the direct comparison backed also by a feat superman cannot match.
Originally posted by krisblaze
It's not a statement that stands on its own without anything to back it up.I think Superman has better reflexes, but I can understand why people would pick Diana.
I said feats have more weight, not that they're the only criteria.
I have no problem with anyone believing Diana is faster (I actually said earlier in the thread that I would see them as equals), I just think that using the McDuffie scene as some sort of evidence is not a good idea. It's terribly OOC, and badly written all to satisfy a personal vendetta.
Though i'm sure if it was the other way around, people would be arguing for it's validity just as much, wouldn't they?