Originally posted by Newjak
There was no concession it was just your post about Wendigo was stupid then as it was from the beginning.And yes you can't completely overlook battles but there are things called PIS/CIS. Unless you want to admit Spider-man beating Firelord physically is possible, or that Black Panther can arm bar lock the Surfer... do you really want to say that.
Fact: There are a number of reasons why certain characters do well particularly when heroes are fighting each other. Namely they hold back against each other.
As for Juggernaut, his punches measured something like 6.0 - 8.0 on the ricter scale. He has thrown an object out of Earth into space. He managed to stop WWH when everyone else was getting destroyed. And just so you don't think I'm trying to just use Hulk, he has also collapsed entire valleys, over powered Colossus easily, and jugger powered Colossus pushed Kuurth all the way back to where he started from. There's his battle with the Stone Cutter that was rocking everything. There's also numerous statements that says he is on Thor's level strength wise.
So no I'm not just relying on feats from his fight vs Thor. Juggernaut has all 3 items going for him he has fights, feats, and statements. 😉
And truth is you still can't prove Wendigo was anywhere close to Thor level strength or even Namor level at that.
Carver Hulk always starts of pissed you're right and yet people like Abom and Rhino can give him prolonged fights to.
You are buffoon. You have no iota of debating skill and you dont even try to mask it. Your implicit concession has been accepted. You can go "wah wah but it was stupid" all you want in order to hide your ineptitude but its not fooling anybody buddy. I see you have also refused to prove the exponential gap between Namor and colossus. Concession accepted on that as well
Trying to arbitrarily characterize all of hercules and Namors battles as PIS is just nonsensical. Really its supposedly PIS because you dont like it and yet it has been shown on multiple occasions that in direct confrontations the gap between them is nowhere near what you are making it out to be. Your fanboy postulations do not trump on panel occurrences. Black panthers hammer lock on Surfer and Firelord getting knocked out by spiderman are examples of PIS because they are occurrences that explicitly contradict consistent on panel history. Namor not being shown as exponentially weaker than Hercules has been consistent in all their fights and is thus NOT a one time outlier occurrence. On average Hercules is not portrayed as millions of times stronger than Namor and thus there is no explicit contradiction if this is reflected in their fights.
If you can show me that Hercules was simply holding back in order not to emphasize the exponential strength gap between he and Namor then show it. Heck you probably havent even read any of their battles and yet you are so sure Hercules was holding back because it supports you egregious conclusion. You have already assumed your conclusion without proper consideration of the material in question and thats fallacy.
Do you really think that those paltry feats you mentioned from juggernaut match Thors best? having punches measured 6-8 on the richter scale? Throwing objects into spaceand collpasing valleys? Are you freaking kidding me? Juggernaut didnt manage to stop WWH, he was literally slowed to a crawl by WWH, who quite frankly has far more claim to the whole "holding back" suggestion than Hercules does against Namor, and then got quickly Bfred. Those are NOT close to Thors high feats or fights His battle with Stone cutter happened during 8th day and was not the norm at all so thats is thus a completely invalid reference (not to mention it only created an earthquake in the area they were standing). Stop trying to romanticize your self serving logic in favor of juggernaut just because you like the character. Fact is your reasoning fails woefully in regards to him just like it does regarding a bunch of other characters.
Burden of proof (you know what that is right?) is on you NOT me to show that Hulk was weaker than he consistently was shown to be otherwise you go nothing. Referencing low feats will get you nowhere. Savage Hulks strength level wasnt as mysterious as you are trying to present it. Its clear your knowledge of the character comes from forum myths as opposed to actual study of the character.