Originally posted by Star Wars Logic
You dont have any "Evidence" of my Competence? 😄 right. but in the future You'll be another one of my Fan Boys.
There should be an apostrophe in "don't", you capitalised "evidence" and "competence" needlessly, you didn't capitalise "right" and "but" when you should have, really, I could go on all day with your every post.
Originally posted by NemeBroYeah you got that right it was Needlessly. This is a Forum Site. To talk about stuff and havin fun' is what im doing right now, before its termination 🙂
There should be an apostrophe in "don't", you capitalised "evidence" and "competence" needlessly, you didn't capitalise "right" and "but" when you should have, really, I could go on all day with your every post.
Originally posted by Star Wars Logic
Where was it stated? it wasnt Stated by any Character. Darth Viliate Didnt not Break the wills of Others untill He Completed his Training Under Marka Ragnos. then after that Viliate lured all the remaining Sith Lords from across the Galaxys to Dromund Kaas or Nathema to break all their wills and absorbed their Force Powers. then had all of them Perticipate in the most complicated Sith Sorcery that Made him Immortal. and to halt his fear of Death.
Just because Marka was his master doesn't mean he was taught said ability by him. 😐
Originally posted by Lord Luciengot both of those wrong. you are a degenerate with No Independant Observation. just another idiot that will go with the Majority Vote to Avoid a Possible Credability Loss. in Other words Patheitc.
Gotta ask: why are you guys trying to argue with 'Star Wars Logic'? There's clearly no convincing him of anything. He's either a very tenacious troll, or a very stupid kid. Either way, why are you bothering?
Originally posted by Star Wars Logic
got both of those wrong. you are a degenerate with No Independant Observation. just another idiot that will go with the Majority Vote to Avoid a Possible Credability Loss. in Other words Patheitc.
See, this is part of your problem.
You insult people for not agreeing with you... when you don't even have evidence and don't pay attention to when the evidence says you're wrong.
It's really clear that you attack people because you're just trying to deflect. Like you've had people tell you this is what's wrong with your arguments before, but rather than fix your arguments or reconsider your point of view, you just go, "*I* know! I'll just insult first so that people won't accuse me of stuff!".
Just using those words don't mean people have those problems, not when you have problems in the argument's actual factual terms, and in the end, it's always what the facts are that determines who's right, not who can insult the other side first and call them 'close minded'.
And I will note the extreme irony of calling people close minded while not being willing to listen to other's arguments.
(I will also note that I've actually gotten people around here to change their opinion on some matters, so no, they aren't all that close minded. You just gotta use facts and not assumption)
Originally posted by Q99No i dont insult people for not agreeing with me. I couldnt care less for what people agree with but thats something you still cant get into your thick little head yet. if someone is going to insult me calling me a TROLL or a STUPID KID even though that person dosent have the slightest clue as to what my personality is like past the keyboard. only viewing my Text then calling me a TROLL or STUPID KID just because i presented Evidence thats other then a movie star's qoute or a quote tookin from a character in a book. of course naturally im going to reply back to that person's insult with one of my own that may turn out to be true later on if evidenced in the User's Actions. (This is just like the Playground in elementary school. the Person who hits the indivisual first dosent get caught nor ridiculed for his actions. And yet when the other indivisual hits back in self defense they get caught in the action stopped by the late witness and scolded for what he done even though he's not the person that should be accused of such) When it comes to the Zeison Sha's argument. i have proved that they are advanced in term of telekinetic attributes notably offense and defense that has not yet been witnessed by the jedi order and also the reason why their elite warriors never suffered casualties. besides some of the zeison sha warriors turning to the dark side' being hunted down and killed if they cannot be turned back to the lightside. otherwise the zeison sha are specialist in telekinetic power and even have a few tricks that no force organizations have seen as of yet. and for marka ragnos being the most powerful force user has been proved in the form of explanatory evidence.
See, this is part of your problem.You insult people for not agreeing with you... when you don't even have evidence and don't pay attention to when the evidence says you're wrong.
It's really clear that you attack people because you're just trying to deflect. Like you've had people tell you this is what's wrong with your arguments before, but rather than fix your arguments or reconsider your point of view, you just go, "*I* know! I'll just insult first so that people won't accuse me of stuff!".
Just using those words don't mean people have those problems, not when you have problems in the argument's actual factual terms, and in the end, it's always what the facts are that determines who's right, not who can insult the other side first and call them 'close minded'.
And I will note the extreme irony of calling people close minded while not being willing to listen to other's arguments.
(I will also note that I've actually gotten people around here to change their opinion on some matters, so no, they aren't all that close minded. You just gotta use facts and not assumption)
No i dont insult people for not agreeing with me.
Yes, you do. Case in point:
I couldnt care less for what people agree with but thats something you still cant get into your thick little head yet.
You say you don't care and immediate leap to 'thick little head'.
You don't consider you could be wrong or listen to when other people point out errors in your argument or present counter-points, you just call them thick-headed, close minded, and so on without accepting what they're saying.
And you started doing this before anyone called you anything.
even though that person dosent have the slightest clue as to what my personality is like past the keyboard
That's another thing: We do know what your personality is like at the keyboard, and that's why people are saying these things. At the keyboard, you're argumentative, dismissive, and toss insults when people say things you don't like even if all they're doing is presenting counter-arguments and examples.
Try just responded with arguments and considering what other people say, rather than dismissing everyone as 'close minded' and 'thick skulled' for disagreeing with you regardless of how much backing their argument has. Calm down and debate and listen, and don't just assume everyone who disagrees is 'thick headed'.
Originally posted by Q99Case in point. you just proved yourself to be exactly what you explained the example of the accused indivisual to be. you didnt read nor consider anything i have said but rather ridiculed envy' and attempted to change my mind with the absence of the from evidence you are looking for. this is the 4th time you have contradicted yourself 🙂
Yes, you do. Case in point:You say you don't care and immediate leap to 'thick little head'.
You don't consider you could be wrong or listen to when other people point out errors in your argument or present counter-points, you just call them thick-headed, close minded, and so on without accepting what they're saying.
And you started doing this before anyone called you anything.
That's another thing: We do know what your personality is like at the keyboard, and that's why people are saying these things. At the keyboard, you're argumentative, dismissive, and toss insults when people say things you don't like even if all they're doing is presenting counter-arguments and examples.
Try just responded with arguments and considering what other people say, rather than dismissing everyone as 'close minded' and 'thick skulled' for disagreeing with you regardless of how much backing their argument has. Calm down and debate and listen, and don't just assume everyone who disagrees is 'thick headed'.