The Void vs Superman

Started by quanchi1127 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Delta1938
Yes, because, ya know, space/time it's self was going to end. So, you think Superman is more powerful than what they endured?
No, he isn't more powerful than what he endured. I can hold up a 50 pound dumbbell for only so long and eventually I will give in and let it drop. Superman could last for a little while that's it.


And fighting equals cooperating? Not to mention, if he can just come back, why hasn't he yet? And nice that you show your double standard in the same interview.[/B]
He doesn't want to come back. Obviously. The guy wanted to die. You want to dismiss what happened on panel without the writer contradicting himself.


It was incredibly clear I was talking about Ares. You simply said you disagree. If you were talking about Loki the entire time, you should've brought it up in the first place. I think you're just covering your mistake.

I notice you like to claim victory when you haven't actually won anything. I'm going to go through SIEGE, so I'll make my decision. [/B]

When you asked I did say I referred to Loki. I didn't make a mistake and never said due to the Ares example. There is more than one way to tear someone in half. In the same arc the Loki attack seemed far more potent.

Delta1938 True King of House of El
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he isn't more powerful than what he endured. I can hold up a 50 pound dumbbell for only so long and eventually I will give in and let it drop. Superman could last for a little while that's it.

So you finally admit that Superman isn't more powerful than what killed Doomsday. Too bad your argument to try and counter that the writer's statement did indeed contradict what we see on panel doesn't hold water.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He doesn't want to come back. Obviously. The guy wanted to die. You want to dismiss what happened on panel without the writer contradicting himself.

It is pretty contradictory to say he was cooperating but have him attack.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When you asked I did say I referred to Loki. I didn't make a mistake and never said due to the Ares example. There is more than one way to tear someone in half. In the same arc the Loki attack seemed far more potent.

So you completely misunderstood what I meant? It was pretty clear I was talking about Ares. So, which is it? You're covering your mistake, or just misunderstood me?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Delta1938
So you finally admit that Superman isn't more powerful than what killed Doomsday. Too bad your argument to try and counter that the writer's statement did indeed contradict what we see on panel doesn't hold water.
My argument was never that Superman's power was more than what killed Doomsday. My argument is that less power can kill Doomsday. Superman still had the power minus his moral code to achieve the task according to Jurgens.


It is pretty contradictory to say he was cooperating but have him attack.[/B]
He cooperated by staying dead. That's the whole cooperating part. My word.


So you completely misunderstood what I meant? It was pretty clear I was talking about Ares. So, which is it? You're covering your mistake, or just misunderstood me? [/B]
It was pretty clear I referred to the manner in which he tore Loki apart. It all happened in the same arc, teargas.