Originally posted by CogitoIt comes down to formidability in the end not feats. By this logic you could say Gladiator is stronger than Superboy Prime.
I won't get what?If you want me to believe a character is of a certain level of power, they need the feats (or at least a statement) proving it.
I'm not going to make stuff up. If that's what I'll never get, then I can live with that.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It comes down to formidability in the end not feats.
This makes no goddamn sense. At all.
Formidability is determined by feats. The end.
Originally posted by quanchi112
By this logic you could say Gladiator is stronger than Superboy Prime.
I have no idea what logic you're talking about. What I do know is that there are dozens of feats that put SBP way above Gladiator.
Originally posted by CogitoFormidability is determined by peer comparisons. If you go by feats only cbr is the place for you.
This makes no goddamn sense. At all.Formidability is determined by feats. The end.
I have no idea what logic you're talking about. What I do know is that there are dozens of feats that put SBP way above Gladiator.
Punching a planet is more quantifiable than Prime's feats.
Originally posted by rotiart
Gotta agree here. I mean Toaa doesnt really have feats but would we put him below random hero?
Originally posted by quanchi112
I bet cogito wouldn't agree here which makes him a hypocrite.
Clearly some characters transcend the need for feats. But if you need feats, TOAA created everything in Marvel. It wasn't shown on panel, but it's know to have happened, and that trumps all other Marvel feats.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Formidability is determined by peer comparisons. If you go by feats only cbr is the place for you.
There are two types of feats. One is what I'll call a "neutral feat". That is, one that involves only one character and is grounded in physics (e.g. lifting feats, speed feats). The other is more difficult to compare and involves 2+ characters (e.g. a fight between two characters).
Make no mistake, if the Hulk lifts a mountain, that's a feat. If the Hulk fights Thor, that's a feat. If the Hulk tanks an attack, that's a feat.
Originally posted by quanchi112😂
Punching a planet is more quantifiable than Prime's feats.
Originally posted by CogitoYou admitted certain characters don't need feats so you are a hypocrite. Feats don't prove crap when these guys run into each other. Combat or peer comparisons matter. Try and keep up.
Clearly some characters transcend the need for feats. But if you need feats, TOAA created everything in Marvel. It wasn't shown on panel, but it's know to have happened, and that trumps all other Marvel feats.There are two types of feats. One is what I'll call a "neutral feat". That is, one that involves only one character and is grounded in physics (e.g. lifting feats, speed feats). The other is more difficult to compare and involves 2+ characters (e.g. a fight between two characters).
Make no mistake, if the Hulk lifts a mountain, that's a feat. If the Hulk fights Thor, that's a feat. If the Hulk tanks an attack, that's a feat.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
You admitted certain characters don't need feats so you are a hypocrite. Feats don't prove crap when these guys run into each other. Combat or peer comparisons matter. Try and keep up.
Omnipotents don't need feats. That's not hypocritical.
Also, combat is a feat, as I already mentioned.
Try and keep up, and maybe next time try to say something new.