Originally posted by Starscream M
so you admit being biased? 😬
lol?
I said I'm a pro-Thor kind of guy, meaning that I support Thor in threads strongly if I feel he wins or can possibly win, using feats and evidence displayed in comics to support my stance. Being one of the most well read and learned Thor fans on the board, I also know when he's outmatched and can't win.
How you get me being biased from that is astounding.
Originally posted by JakeTheBankdood, the definition of bias is being pro-something as opposed to being neutral
lol?I said I'm a pro-Thor kind of guy, meaning that I support Thor in threads strongly if I feel he wins or can possibly win, using feats and evidence displayed in comics to support my stance. Being one of the most well read and learned Thor fans on the board, I also know when he's outmatched and can't win.
How you get me being biased from that is astounding.
Originally posted by CosmicCometHe wasn't omnipotent. Had he been he could have defeated Chaos King. But since you basically are begging me to debate I will thus do so. Prepare yourself.
Being omnipotent IS the f*cking feat.Jesus man.
Jesus.
Cogito's point was not difficult to understand.
Originally posted by MindsetAbsolutely.
People actually think Thor will win?
Originally posted by Starscream M
there's no need to member bash, jake. that's just being immature. 😬
I'm not bashing you. Just making an observation based on your posts as a whole. Ignorance in of itself isn't a bad thing; god knows I've certainly not read every comic ever. But in my honest opinion, it just seems like you really don't know what you're talking about.
As it is, this thread is essentially spite.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He wasn't omnipotent. Had he been he could have defeated Chaos King. But since you basically are begging me to debate I will thus do so. Prepare yourself.
??
I'm not talking about Herc.
I'm talking about you saying TOAA has no feats and thus he's weak according to Cogito's reasoning.