Satele and Marek vs The Sith Emperor

Started by Lord Lucien12 pages
Lord Lucien Lets all love Lain

No--duh! he decided to sacrifice himself.

Arhael Devoid of reality

Yeah, brah!

Lord Lucien Lets all love Lain

Don't bro me, brah. It's totally not braw, broskie.

Arhael Devoid of reality

Ok, mate!

DARTH POWER Senior Member

Galen did lower his defenses to save the rebels according to the novel. That's made clear.

So an argument can be made that the result of the final confrontation could have been different if Galen wasn't trying to protect the rebels.

SIDIOUS 66 Senior Member

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Galen did lower his defenses to save the rebels according to the novel. That's made clear.

So an argument can be made that the result of the final confrontation could have been different if Galen wasn't trying to protect the rebels.

Obviously. But Arhael seems to imply that Marek could have overcome Palpatine, which is a losing argument.

Arhael Devoid of reality

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
Obviously. But Arhael seems to imply that Marek could have overcome Palpatine, which is a losing argument.

That's sounds contradictory.
On his quote "result of the final confrontation could have been different" you say "obviously", which means you agree that, if not sacrifice, different result with Marek winning is possible. Then you say that implication that Marek could have overcome Palpatine is a losing argument.

These are my quotes:

If he did not decide to sacrifice himself, there is a chance that he would have won.

Indeed, there was small chance to win.

I merely stated that, if not sacrifice, Marek would have a chance to win. And I admit that odds are on Palpatine's side, thus chance was very small.

SIDIOUS 66 Senior Member

lol

Arhael, just stop.

Arhael Devoid of reality

Originally posted by SIDIOUS 66
lol

Arhael, just stop.


Not until your brain meltzzz. 😈

Nephthys The Gr8est!!!!!!!!

Bunp.

I wonder if anyones changed their opinions on this yet?