Originally posted by quanchi112
I am always right
directly contradicts the idea of you having a subjective opinion:
Originally posted by quanchi112
but again my opinion is my own.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I did not concede. Batman Begns the best of the Batman bunch.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerNot everything is subjective though. Certain things have been proven as what I said further down the line. I always back up my case with evidence.
directly contradicts the idea of you having a subjective opinion:Saying that one Movie 1 is the best of bunch isn't the same as saying that TDK was the worst. Which reeks of moronic clowning around and/or imbecilic trollery, both of which you are well known for on KMC Forums.
Movie 1 was the best and movie two was the worst to me. Thats my opinion.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not everything is subjective though. Certain things have been proven as what I said further down the line. I always back up my case with evidence.Movie 1 was the best and movie two was the worst to me. Thats my opinion.
Get back to me when you are no longer able to flip-flop between just 2 posts alone.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerThat is not an objective fact it is just my subjective opinion. I never said my opinion was a fact here.
Lol, so you cling to the claim that TDK being worse of the lot is an opinion of yours, but somehow now we're supposed to believe its an objective fact?Get back to me when you are no longer able to flip-flop between just 2 posts alone.
You misunderstand my posts. Thats your deal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is not an objective fact it is just my subjective opinion. I never said my opinion was a fact here.You misunderstand my posts. Thats your deal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not everything is subjective though. Certain things have been proven as what I said further down the line. I always back up my case with evidence.
Nope. You can't even stick to what you say one post after another. That's your deal.
Originally posted by TheGodKillerSaying Sookie did not use her supernova attack turned out to be a fact. At first it wasn't so you were free to misinterpret it. Later you found out you lacked comprehension skills. My opinion turned objective after it was spelled out for you. That's an example.
Flip-flopping again:Nope. You can't even stick to what you say one post after another. That's your deal.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Saying Sookie did not use her supernova attack turned out to be a fact. At first it wasn't so you were free to misinterpret it. Later you found out you lacked comprehension skills. My opinion turned objective after it was spelled out for you. That's an example.
Originally posted by -Pr-👆
The main thing for me is that I feel people can't separate what makes a good movie, and what makes a good Batman movie.
That's my view on the Nolan films. With the exception of TDK: R they're all decent films, but pretty poor Batman films. Marvel's films lack substance but they've been damn good at translating the characters from the comics onto the big screen.
Originally posted by Lord Lucien
No, Ledger confirmed in a recent interview that Brad Pitt asked him for advice on how to pull off a manic laugh for his (then) upcoming Fight Club documentary. Your misinterpretation had it right the first time, DDM.
Why am I the only one that's questioning the fact & logic behind Pitt asking Ledger for advice?
I mean how "recent" is this interview considering Ledger died 5 years ago?
Fight Club 1999
Batman Begins 2005
The Dark Knight 2008
So Brad Pitt hops in a time machine & travels from 1999 to 2008 to ask Ledger advice on maniacal laughter?
Furthermore you're kinda implying that Ledger knew 9 years in advance that he would one day be casted as The Joker by Nolan.
🙄 🙄 🙄 🙄
Originally posted by Tzeentch._
👆That's my view on the Nolan films. With the exception of TDK: R they're all decent films, but pretty poor Batman films. Marvel's films lack substance but they've been damn good at translating the characters from the comics onto the big screen.
Batman Begins was good at showing the character Imo. After that they were more concerned with making them good movies, something I'm never going to complain about providing they succeed at that and give the character a worthy origin story
As for Marvel films getting the characters so perfect.. Maybe Marvel studios have done a much better job at that, but most Marvel comics films have completely failed at that. Just look at Cyclops or Dr. Doom for f*** sake.
Even Marvel studios themselves have done some horrendous things- completely destroying iconic villains like the Mandarin, in an effort to apparently just "make a good movie."
At least Nolan was successful in making an epic series based on an iconic comic book character.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
At least Nolan was successful in making an epic series based on an iconic comic book character.
But in making the series epic, Nolan turned that iconic comic book character into a minor role.
I swear you could easily edit all the Batman scenes from TDK &TDKR & still have a credible story....and as a Batman fan, I don't mean this in a positive way. Nolan made Batman obsolete in his own movie.