Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilDark knight was a sequel as well. Sorry, that marvel is leaps and bounds better than dc at building momentum.
Only if you watched all the solo movies. They didn't have to bother with any of that pesky back story or character development. They just went right for the action and the scientists banter.I'm not saying that the dark knight is better, just that avengers had WAAAYYYY more build up.
Originally posted by NotAllThatEvilIt was the worst of the trilogy. Making these heroes come together was unforgettable whereas TwoFace and the Joker were disappointing.
A sequel with a new villain, a new hero/villain, and went further into the main character. Did avengers advance any sort of character arc? Really?
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
So Fight Club was made 9 years BEFORE TDK but you're saying that Pit ripped off Ledger's performance...Where's the logic in your reasoning?
You're not that dumb, are you? 😐
Originally posted by Esau Cairn
If you read Dadude's post, he was implying that Brad copied Ledger.
Oh snap.
K. Well, you clearly have it backwards. It looks like Ledger got inspiration from Pitt.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is just your opinion. Mine is different. Avengers is more successful. Fact.
Yeah kind of like it's just your opinion that Khan beats Yoda in a fight.
But your outvoted 46-3 which is the only FACT.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.The manner in which they came to work together was breathtaking. Dc needs to take notes.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Made more money than any Batman films. 🙂
And btw if you account for inflation and 3d ticket sales, I'm not sure there is much difference in the financial success of TDK and Avengers.
Except Batman did so on his own. So perhaps Marvel are the ones who should be taking notes mhmm
Originally posted by quanchi112
It was the worst of the trilogy.TwoFace and the Joker were disappointing.