Originally posted by Psychotron
They wouldn't have worked on the LoS or Bane. She fought only weaklings.That's my point. Hollywood should stop putting guys like Matt Daemon (or women like Scarlett) in action roles. It doesn't work.
She pulled them off in her fights with security guards, she'll fail against Baleman. One brick-shattering kick and it's over.
The problem is you are only assigning them to be weak because Natasha used moves you think are stupid to beat them. The whole point of the scene is to show the opposite.
So despite what you want to believe. Natasha found herself tied to a chair facing three adult men who under the circumstances likely had military experience since they were following a general and no general is going to not take guys with military backgrounds.
I mean it doesn't even matter if they were weak. You could take a very strong, very talented fighter and put them in the same situation against three weak people and that MAer is going to get their @$$ whooped if they are tied to a chair.
The thing is you assuming that Natahsa isn't skilled because you don't like the choreography or the moves she was using cause you think they are weak and bad, but that goes completely against the entire purpose of that scene. It was to show that she is a BA who can take three fully grown men down while tied to a chair.
And there is a reason why they choose ACTORS instead of MAers for those rolls. Cause at the end of the day at some point you are gonna want them to act, and have to pull off an actual scene of character development.
Are you one of those people who say only wrestlers should portray Superheros cause they are the only ones who can look the part?