Originally posted by Starscream M
its funny how you equate thor losing as to being poorly written...
Two separate thoughts there, Brucie.
Thor losing doesn't make an event poorly written.
The mutant community being vilified and character assassinated and people acting wildly out of character make this a poor event. I'd rather have a good story than good feats to argue for a battleboard.
Originally posted by carver9this is an argument for another time. Flash was quite obviously faster thats not the question at hand. Though going by on panel proof superman was moving with speed near the flash. He was perceiving the flash fast enough to see him moving yet when he was grabbing at him he was just missing each time.
..
Uuuuummm...Flash was blitzing the hell out of Supes. Supes got one lick on a Flash that stopped moving and you call them "near".? No, just no. Looking at on panel fts, Thor will hit Supes just like others have.
Originally posted by BlackZero30x
this is an argument for another time. Flash was quite obviously faster thats not the question at hand. Though going by on panel proof superman was moving with speed near the flash. He was perceiving the flash fast enough to see him moving yet when he was grabbing at him he was just missing each time.
So Flash was going his top speed during that fight? Was Batman and the GL able to perceive Flash during that fight.?
Originally posted by carver9
Sigh...in order for you to believe they were equals, Flash had to have been going his top speed, no? So that is what I'm asking. Not trying to put words in your mouth buddy.
No. I was speaking of that isolated incidence. It was obvious The Flash was much faster if you read his book. So clearly I meant he was near the flash in that incidence. Would you say thor could have done any better then superman did while flash was moving at that speed? But if you would prefer a different instance ...remember when Flash and Supers was running from the OE? The Flash's face was obviously showing tiring. A moment longer and it would have hit him. After that panel superman was hit unless you are going to say one beam was moving faster then the other.....
Originally posted by carver9Gladz was on his deathbed from that one beating Thor has taken 5-6 beatings and hes still walking around 😬
Let's use a High Herald as an example. Gladiator...it took 3 of the Phoenix members to repeatedly pound on Gladiator for no telling how long, in order to drop him in a prolong fight. Thor got two pieced by Colossus and Magic. This also doesn't include Emma soloing him or Namor embarrassing him. That throws high Herald out the window.Then we have the Avengers bringing the fight to the 5, everyone getting attacked, hell, Spiderman even withstands a beat down but then we have Thing carrying Thor yet again. He isn't operating at Heralds level, not even close. Superman isn't either but I would put him above this version of Thor imo. Not far above but enough to pull the majority.
Originally posted by Starscream M
its funny how you equate thor losing as to being poorly written...
Originally posted by iceman24567
Gladz was on his deathbed from that one beating Thor has taken 5-6 beatings and hes still walking around 😬
👆 He was in a coma iirc. And all he got was a glorified beat down. He stopped fighting back after Colossus worked him.
Originally posted by BlackZero30x
No. I was speaking of that isolated incidence. It was obvious The Flash was much faster if you read his book. So clearly I meant he was near the flash in that incidence. Would you say thor could have done any better then superman did while flash was moving at that speed? But if you would prefer a different instance ...remember when Flash and Supers was running from the OE? The Flash's face was obviously showing tiring. A moment longer and it would have hit him. After that panel superman was hit unless you are going to say one beam was moving faster then the other.....
Sigh, just sigh. Everyone during that instance was injured/fatigue. Not a good testament towards what you are trying to argue.