Originally posted by Silent Master
Going off on a tangent about eggs doesn't prove anything in regards to the shield.Now, Can you prove that Superboy prime's hv is over 999 trillion times as powerful as Thor/Hulk's damage output?
It's harder to prove something true than false. To prove something false you provide a counterexample. I did. I showed that if an attack can't damage an object then that doesn't mean the object can withstand multiple times more force. Remember, a rule is only true if it is always true. Any counterexample proves the rule false.
But to prove that an attack is multiple times that of the durability of an object is simple. Just look at how the attack damaged the object. For example, it takes astronomically more power to pulverize the moon into dust than to break it into 1000 pieces. It takes astronomically more power to penetrate an object without any visible resistance (like a ghost) than to penetrate it with good resistance.
Now please don't argue just to win the debate. If I'm right then say so or prove how I'm not right. Even you can be bias at times.
Lastly, IMO Superman would have withstood being penetrated completely through by PF Cykes blast. This is because it didn't completely penetrate Thor.
Some where Cykes blast not penetrating the shield as proof Prime's hv won't penetrate. Superman can also withstand being penetrated completely through from Hulk's and Thor strikes. Sure they can damage him but they won't penetrate his being completely through. This shows that the shield is more durable than Superman's body. But it's not much more durable than Superman's body since it didn't withstand attacks greater than the things Superman has withstood. Otherwise we would have a no limits fallacy.
Originally posted by Branlor Swift
lol eggs
You just mad cause you can't think outside of the box. 😛