Captain America Shields Test

Started by DarkOdin12 pages

Originally posted by carver9
To a point, I agree with this but Serpent was pretty much on Odin level and those were enchanted weapons, enchanted to the point that even Magneto was unable to manipulate them (and Magneto has tossed Mjlonir to the side with ease).

It was stated more than once as being a Thor like weapons and why wouldn't the Serpent give them the same type of enchantment if again, he was as powerful as Odin himself?

Towards the end the serpent was but he made the worthy in order to instill fear to get to the level. So at the time of making the hammers he was weaker the Odinpower but non the less the uru hammers of the worthy were made by a low-mid level skyfather

Originally posted by ODG
Cap's shield is more durable than Mjolnir.
His former shield is more durable than Mjolnir? How so?

When KT struck the shield with Mjolnir, the shield gave. Mjolnir didn't.

Originally posted by Galan007
His former shield is more durable than Mjolnir? How so?

When KT struck the shield with Mjolnir, the shield gave. Mjolnir didn't.

Savage Hulk's fist didn't give when striking Ultron's adamantium armor either.

Originally posted by ODG
Savage Hulk's fist didn't give when striking Ultron's adamantium armor either.

Hhhhmmm, could have a good point. The only question is...was Ultron body damaged when this happened?

^ Yes, he dented him:
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Hulk%20Strength/SavageHulkStrikingPower23SW12.jpg

Originally posted by ODG
^ Yes, he dented him:
http://i388.photobucket.com/albums/oo326/OneDumbG0/Hulk%20Strength/SavageHulkStrikingPower23SW12.jpg

why did he blow up?

^ Because Wasp flew inside the gap opened by the dent and started yanking wires and stuff.

ah. That was primary adamantium Ultron to huh? Hell of a feat for Hulk to damage him like that.

Originally posted by ODG
Savage Hulk's fist didn't give when striking Ultron's adamantium armor either.
Okay?

Here's a direct comparison between the shield and Mjolnir:

Mjolnir came out clearly superior (ie. the shield was dented to phuck, and Mjolnir was unscathed.)

So ABC logic aside, what durability feats does the shield have that put it above Mjolnir? This is an honest question as I have always thought of Mjolnir as superior-- but with sufficient proof, I have no problem reversing my opinion.

🙂

I'm about to enjoy this...One Dumb vs Galan. Love it when these two go at it.

Not going at it at all. As long as he can give me good reasons why the shield's durability>Mjolnir's (and if such reasons exist, he likely knows), then I'll have no problem accepting that line of logic.

It's just an alien concept for me to grasp, because I have never thought of the shield as superior to Mjolnir. /shrug

Originally posted by Galan007
Okay?

Here's a direct comparison between the shield and Mjolnir:

Mjolnir came out clearly superior (ie. the shield was dented to phuck, and Mjolnir was unscathed.)

So ABC logic aside, what durability feats does the shield have that put it above Mjolnir? This is an honest question as I have always thought of Mjolnir as superior-- but with sufficient proof, I have no problem reversing my opinion.

🙂

Just my two cents. Could Mjolnir have been augmented by the same force that created it? After all Perrikus cut the hammer in two like butter while Thor was in a far inferior state. Just one variable to consider. Sorry to butt in continue the debate.

Originally posted by Stoic
Just my two cents. Could Mjolnir have been augmented by the same force that created it? After all Perrikus cut the hammer in two like butter while Thor was in a far inferior state. Just one variable to consider. Sorry to butt in continue the debate.
Good question. I honestly don't know if variances in Thor's levels of power empower/depower Mjolnir by proxy..?

Originally posted by Galan007
Good question. I honestly don't know if variances in Thor's levels of power empower/depower Mjolnir by proxy..?

Not Thor's power, but the Odin force that he possessed.

Originally posted by Galan007
Not going at it at all. As long as he can give me good reasons why the shield's durability>Mjolnir's (and if such reasons exist, he likely knows), then I'll have no problem accepting that line of logic.

It's just an alien concept for me to grasp, because I have never thought of the shield as superior to Mjolnir. /shrug

Same here...I honestly think they are in the same bracket. One Dumb will find something though that's pretty hard to debate against.

odin's enchantment is partly responsible, even the handle and leather thong are indestructible from them

I thought it was said in the Gaying arc that the Odin Force enhanced Mjolnir

Originally posted by Branlor Swift
I thought it was said in the Gaying arc that the Odin Force enhanced Mjolnir

😂 WTF

Originally posted by Galan007
Okay?

Here's a direct comparison between the shield and Mjolnir:

Mjolnir came out clearly superior (ie. the shield was dented to phuck, and Mjolnir was unscathed.)

So ABC logic aside, what durability feats does the shield have that put it above Mjolnir? This is an honest question as I have always thought of Mjolnir as superior-- but with sufficient proof, I have no problem reversing my opinion.

🙂

Which means that one thing giving way while the other doesn't really doesn't mean much. And I'd think you'd agree with that as I would be surprised you'd conclude Mjolnir/Stormbreaker is more durable than Galactus' armor considering they didn't give way while shattering the armor.

Perrikus cleaved it, Destroyer cleaved it, Destroyer wrecked it another time. Thor's rebuilt Mjolnir with little more than lightning at times (and a Pittsburgh steel forge another time). Molecule Man's musings between Cap's shield and Mjolnir heavily implied it was more durable.

Originally posted by carver9
Same here...I honestly think they are in the same bracket. One Dumb will find something though that's pretty hard to debate against.

Have you considered what I wrote above?