Russell Edgington vs. Link (TP)

Originally posted by BloodRain
So thats accepting the strength, as the game shows us, and accepting the skill, as the game shows us, while ignoring the durability, which the game shows us.

You can't prove this angle theory so.. not much to go on. Lol urm yes, thats what happens, allow me to expand on that example: You're walking down the road and a small child appears and socks you in the face, knocking you out. If you get KOd by those punches, a pro boxer throwing a right hook at your nose [b]will take you out.

Punch from a child KOing VS tanking a pro boxers punch. That is what it is. And like the others increasing, there is only one canon explanation; Like the rest, is increased. [/B]

The axe can hurt him. Just because it doesn kill him in one cutscene does not mean his skin repels swords and axes.

It also depends on your stance, alertness, etc.

If my adrenalin lets me not feel a persons punches that does not mean I am immune to punches.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The game shows us the entire game that axes, arrows, and the e emits can hurt him. One cutscene does not erase his portrayal or the other cutscenes. You people and your cherry picking.

The axe can hurt him. Just because it doesn kill him in one cutscene does not mean his skin repels swords and axes.

It also depends on your stance, alertness, etc.

If my adrenalin lets me not feel a persons punches that does not mean I am immune to punches.

Actually yes, it does. It means if a class 5+ could not do it with an axe a class 1 cannot do it without an axe. Simple.

Whether or not I see an axe coming has no bearing on how tough my skin is.

Go get high on adrenaline and let someone who can lift cars over their head hit you with an axe.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Actually, no, the game gives us a cutscene where a super strong character with an axe [b]cannot hurt him. What other cutscenes? The only other time a weapon like that hits him is before he's super human.

Actually yes, it does. It means if a class 5+ could not do it with an axe a class 1 cannot do it without an axe. Simple.

Whether or not I see an axe coming has no bearing on how tough my skin is.

Go get high on adrenaline and let someone who can lift cars over their head hit you with an axe. [/B]

He does not change save slight strength increase and heavy skill increase.

You can't prove jackshit about his class. Unquantifiable feats are unquantifiable feats.

If Link was immune to the axe he could let Bulbin just swing away. Surviving one cutscene in a game which shows very little blood due to it being a sissy kids game does not make a strong case.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He survives the attack but you have to defeat the boss. He can hurt you with the axe. You're so dishonest you make me sick.

He does not change save slight strength increase and heavy skill increase.

You can't prove jackshit about his class. Unquantifiable feats are unquantifiable feats.

If Link was immune to the axe he could let Bulbin just swing away. Surviving one cutscene in a game which shows very little blood due to it being a sissy kids game does not make a strong case.

So Link in Ordon village was durable enough not to be crushed by 60+ tons in motion?

There's nothing unquantifiable about ragdolling a rhino sized animal.

Rated T.

Did you ever prove your adrenaline thing?

As I recall, you claimed that Link could have survived the axe due to adrenaline and that he would feel it later. You failed to establish that Link felt it later, or even that adrenaline would allow something like that, though. By resuming this argument does that mean you've found some proof?

Originally posted by The Scenario
Did you ever prove your adrenaline thing?

As I recall, you claimed that Link could have survived the axe due to adrenaline and that he would feel it later. You failed to establish that Link felt it later, or even that adrenaline would allow something like that, though. By resuming this argument does that mean you've found some proof?

The game makes it clear Bulbin can hurt him. Not killing him does not mean cannot hurt him.

Ridiculous.

Woo, saved from typing a lot out~

Yeah countering that scene with angles and adrenaline is all fiction unless you can start proving it.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Provide an example of King Bulbin hurting Link with an axe in canon pls.

So Link in Ordon village was durable enough not to be crushed by 60+ tons in motion?

There's nothing unquantifiable about ragdolling a rhino sized animal.

Rated T.

Basically you feel Link's awesome quest puts him up against enemies he cannot hurt. Link also never kills him. 😂

Speculation. Unquanfitable.

Yes, there is. You can play the nerd type guessing game all you want.

Not a graphic game at all. For kids. Not same adult game like God of War.

Originally posted by quanchi112
We play the game and realize he can. Just because one axe shot does not kill him we don't throw everything else out and say Bulbin can't hurt him with an axe.

Basically you feel Link's awesome quest puts him up against enemies he cannot hurt. Link also never kills him. 😂

Speculation. Unquanfitable.

Yes, there is. You can play the nerd type guessing game all you want.

Not a graphic game at all. For kids. Not same adult game like God of War.

Link beats him into submission.

I lol'd. We see it happen, it is easily quantified. Force in excess of what Russell can generate did not hurt Link. Saw that on screen.

How about you just play the game and watch the feats happen?

You don't understand the concept of maturity very well.

Originally posted by BloodRain
Woo, saved from typing a lot out~

Yeah countering that scene with angles and adrenaline is all fiction unless you can start proving it.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Times Bulbin did not hurt Link with an axe 1. Times he did hurt Link 0.

Link beats him into submission.

I lol'd. We see it happen, it is easily quantified. Force in excess of what Russell can generate did not hurt Link. Saw that on screen.

How about you just play the game and watch the feats happen?

You don't understand the concept of maturity very well.

False. Russell moves faster than anything which has hit Link. Bulbin's men ko'd him. 😂

Yes, I do. Immature kiddie game.

Russell slaps his head off.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Game makes it clear he is not immune to King Bulbin's axe.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
When?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Let him attack you. No, he does not.

False. Russell moves faster than anything which has hit Link. Bulbin's men ko'd him. 😂

Yes, I do. Immature kiddie game.

Russell slaps his head off.

Russell is not faster than Ganondorf who Link fought just fine.

You're so salty.

Russell is too slow and weak.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When you fight him in the game let him attack you over twenty times and tell me what happens.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So... Gameplay mechanic damage? Non-canon.

Russell is not faster than Ganondorf who Link fought just fine.

You're so salty.

Russell is too slow and weak.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
So... Gameplay mechanic damage? Non-canon.

Russell is not faster than Ganondorf who Link fought just fine.

You're so salty.

Russell is too slow and weak.

Russell is faster than Link. Link could not even draw his sword.

Bullets>>>>Arrows.

In the game he's portrayed as being unhurt by the axe.

Russell couldn't stop Link from drawing his sword even if he were faster.

Not the arrows in Zelda.

so it takes someone much stronger than Russ 20 hits to knock out Link, And Russ is suppose to do it before he draws his sword?

We've already gone over how gameplay mechanics are not canon. You've even agreed with this in this thread when saying the damage Zany took didn't count because it was a gameplay mechanic.. :l

This argument always goes in a cycle. We all know what the next step is but we do it anyway.

In game, swords, bombs, spears, axes, maces, arrows, claws, ice, electricity, fire, magic, icebergs, poison, acid, and lasers all fail to kill Link. Even if this hurts him slightly, it fails to do permanent harm or instantly kill him. Are you sure you want to go own the gameplay road again? In Twilight Princess terms, Russell would deal half a heart of damage.

Again, the gameplay argument makes Link stronger. By ignoring it, we are intentionally nerfing him. We're not randomly picking and choosing, we're sticking to the rules everyone agreed should be set down where gameplay is concerned. If you have a problem with that, you can make a case for it in Games vs. or, heck, make a thread here so everyone can discuss the rule again.

Is that acceptable?