Avengers: Age of Ultron

Originally posted by TH3_V01D
This is gonna be handy for the versus boards

Many people missed this quote from Whedon in the Empire Magazine. Sounds like he doesn't consider Thor a rival for Hulk

Hulk is pretty much confirmed as the top dog and biggest gun in the MCU.

Marvel really droped the ball with Thor, his franchise is horrible, he is super nerfed and judging from how late Hemsworth joined compared to the other stars, i bet he is gonna be the Avenger with least screen time.

Originally posted by TH3_V01D
This is gonna be handy for the versus boards

Many people missed this quote from Whedon in the Empire Magazine. Sounds like he doesn't consider Thor a rival for Hulk

Hulk is pretty much confirmed as the top dog and biggest gun in the MCU.

👆

Glad to see it finally confirmed.

Originally posted by TH3_V01D
This is gonna be handy for the versus boards

Many people missed this quote from Whedon in the Empire Magazine. Sounds like he doesn't consider Thor a rival for Hulk

Hulk is pretty much confirmed as the top dog and biggest gun in the MCU.

Marvel really droped the ball with Thor, his franchise is horrible, he is super nerfed and judging from how late Hemsworth joined compared to the other stars, i bet he is gonna be the Avenger with least screen time.

Urmm no. I've had that magazine for a while but you're taking his words way too literally. The movie made it clear that Thor clearly is a rival to the Hulk.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Urmm no. I've had that magazine for a while but you're taking his words way too literally. The movie made it clear that Thor clearly is a rival to the Hulk.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No. The movie made it clear Thor can't go toe to toe for long against the Hulk. He just confirmed it as well.

Originally posted by Firefly218
Quit being stupid

Someone needs to make a "Quan Vs Stupidity" thread. 😎

Originally posted by Firefly218
No. The movie didn't make anything clear. Thor could've been holding back, Hulk was out of control. The movie gave fair treatment to both characters, by not undermining one of them to empower the other. Quit being stupid

👆

Plus Thor fought him on the Hellicarrier. So couldn't even unleash his upper most powers like whipping Hulk up in a tornado like Thor did to The Destroyer.

And if you take Whedon's words completely literally he didnt say Hulk would beat Thor (he's actually specifically talking about Hulk and IM) but says "there's no one who can go up against Hulk".. Except Thor already did go up against him. So taking those words completely literally is silly and makes no sense.

Hulk vs Thor can go either way Imho. But if it ends up going toe to toe like on the Hellicarrier then Hulk has the obvious strength advantage.

Originally posted by Firefly218
No. The movie didn't make anything clear. Thor could've been holding back, Hulk was out of control. The movie gave fair treatment to both characters, by not undermining one of them to empower the other. Quit being stupid

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Someone needs to make a "Quan Vs Stupidity" thread. 😎

How do you know Thor was "trying to take him on"? The movie tacitly implies that Thor was trying to contain the Hulk, so the Hulk doesn't destroy the entire helicarrier. It's very very hard to contain the Hulk. If Thor was actually taking on the Hulk, the fight could have gone differently.

Seriously though, they're both awesome characters. Stop picking favorites and hating.

Originally posted by Firefly218
How do you know Thor was "trying to take him on"? The movie tacitly implies that Thor was trying to contain the Hulk, so the Hulk doesn't destroy the entire helicarrier. It's very very hard to contain the Hulk. If Thor was actually taking on the Hulk, the fight could have gone differently.

Seriously though, they're both awesome characters. Stop picking favorites and hating.

Sure, if it seemed like Hulk was superior I understand. Just don't say the movie made it clear. The movie did NOT make it clear, which is what I really liked. Marvel treats ALL of its characters with respect.

DC, so far, only treats Batman and Superman with respect.

If "there's no one who can go up against Hulk" then I guess neither can Thanos or Odin.

According to that statement, Hulk >>>>>>> Thanos

Originally posted by Firefly218
Sure, if it seemed like Hulk was superior I understand. Just don't say the movie made it clear. The movie did NOT make it clear, which is what I really liked. Marvel treats ALL of its characters with respect.

DC, so far, only treats Batman and Superman with respect.

Originally posted by Silent Master
According to that statement, Hulk >>>>>>> Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos is the most powerful character in the universe. Statements, kiddo.

Infallible Director & Creator statements >>> Fallible In Universe character statements.

Therefore Whedon's Infallible statement clearly suggests that NO ONE can go up against Hulk. Not Thor, not Odin and not Thanos.

Unless of course Whedon's statement wasn't a completely literal one, and had some kind of implied context, like maybe talking about humans and mortals going up against Hulk but excluding the obvious - (High end alien beings and Relative Immortals)... :hmm:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos is the most powerful character in the universe. Statements, kiddo.

Are you saying that Whedon's statement isn't true?

Originally posted by Silent Master
Are you saying that Whedon's statement isn't true?

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Infallible Director & Creator statements >>> Fallible In Universe character statements.

Therefore Whedon's Infallible statement clearly suggests that NO ONE can go up against Hulk. Not Thor, not Odin and not Thanos.

Unless of course Whedon's statement wasn't a completely literal one, and had some kind of implied context, like maybe talking about humans and mortals going up against Hulk but excluding the obvious - (High end alien beings and Relative Immortals)... :hmm: