Originally posted by Lek Kuen
Pretty much every review is going to say things you disagree with and puts their view as the correct one, just comes with the turf and is why there are so many of them instead of just one single reviewer. Now you may not like Joe's videos and that's fine but he sure as hell isn't just some bandwagoner he was one of the only mainstream sources who raged hard about the broken state of Rome 2 and argues that we shouldn't just accept broken games because of the possibility of a patch later where as most count that as miner. And while he is no Jim sterling he isn't afraid to seriously point out issues in the industry like Ridley said.
I get that. I agree that commenting on the industry is paramount to its health and stability. That said, I admittedly haven't seen his thoughts on it; just his movie reviews. Though, I feel it's pretty easy for one to simply "get angry" (his persona, I know) about the flawed state of something and simply complain that it's flawed, which is really what I meant to infer (not that he was a bandwagonier). It's another thing if he's actually making concise, constructive, concrete points without simply parroting everyone else. This may just be me (though, I doubt it), but basically, I haven't had that good experience with him that inclines me to entertain his thoughts or opinions on most things.