One Imperiex Probe Vs The Annihilators

Originally posted by Juntai
It's clear they were meant to be above, judging by their performances against teams and even the one on ones. I mean, they were manhandling the other 'peers' of Superman.

I understand your problem with this, is that Superman was manhandling by the handful when he went balls out, and thus, he should be able to do that to the other 'peers' as well.

I don't see the problem, and believe that in that mode- he would. And -easily-.

Superman has 'peers', but he constantly distinguishes himself from them to the point where even they're flat out amazed. This was one of those examples.

Him manhandling Darkseid, was another -- perhaps less extreme -- version of this. His battles were Doomsday are the same. No one else could toe to toe and slug with Doomsday.

But somehow, the haters don't seem to recognize this.

Somehow they see it as, well, if Superman can do it, then so can abcd and e.

Orion has also beaten the hell/killed Darkseid on panel. Darkseid also manhandled Superman during OWAW so it's ironic you using the word manhandle. Darkseid, Orion, and Superman are all peers so one can look better than the other on occasion no one is flat out above any of them as a rule of thumb.

I am a hater and proud of it. But don't you dare accuse others of being haters just because they share a different perspective.

Surfer's made Galactus awe at his crunch feat, Thor has almost killed a weakened Galactus, destroyed Exitar's dome, etc. These feats don't suddenly make them beyond their peers it's just another example of their highest most impressive moments. Most long standing top tiers have them don't act like this is somehow different for Superman.

Originally posted by abhilegend
You haven't even read OWAW, have you? It was loeb who had superman and mongul struggle against a single probe. It was Joe Casey who had superman tear probes apart.

Because it wasn't insignificant. Containing even a portion of a big bang is better than any energy manipulation annihilators have.
Yep, anytime characters don't bust planets they under-perform. Nice logic.

It wasn't Jeph loeb who wrote superman tearing through probes.

You don't read marvel comics do you? That is the only explanation for believing that feat is absolutely better than anybody on the Annihilators

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You don't read marvel comics do you? That is the only explanation for believing that feat is absolutely better than anybody on the Annihilators

Originally posted by abhilegend
Hahaha what? I don't read marvel comics? Why don't you educate me then about who in the annihilators has better feat than OWAW superman? No cosmic cheese. Let's go.

OWAW can he seen as a "cosmic cheese" arc, tho. If you argue within its scope, you should allow the opposing side to introduce cosmic cheese themselves.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
OWAW can he seen as a "cosmic cheese" arc, tho. If you argue within its scope, you should allow the opposing side to introduce cosmic cheese themselves.

Originally posted by abhilegend
By cosmic cheese, I meant destroying planets and shit.

Yeah, but like I said, why exclude specific feats that may prove their point within similar storytelling styles as the arc in question (OWAW)? If you really wanna prove your point without a shadow of a doubt, allow them thar courtesy of presenting equal evidences and simply counter their arguments.

I certainly see you as capable of doing so.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
Yeah, but like I said, why exclude specific feats that may prove their point within similar storytelling styles as the arc in question (OWAW)? If you really wanna prove your point without a shadow of a doubt, allow them thar courtesy of presenting equal evidences and simply counter their arguments.

I certainly see you as capable of doing so.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Because debating with feats about destroying planets and shit is boring! I can do that too, but I prefer character fights much more than these kind of feats. Honestly, if I went to space cheese route superman wouldn't lose a single fight on the forums to anyone below skyfathers.

But that's my point. Let em bring thier big guns ang counter it. That way, no doubts.

Boring or no, it will conclusively end the debate. 🙂

Originally posted by Nibedicus
But that's my point. Let em bring thier big guns ang counter it. That way, no doubts.

Boring or no, it will conclusively end the debate. 🙂

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
You don't read marvel comics do you? That is the only explanation for believing that feat is absolutely better than anybody on the Annihilators

Kid, I was talking about your claim that Kyle feat was better than any absorbtion feat by any annihilator. That is your stance correct?

Originally posted by Nibedicus
OWAW can he seen as a "cosmic cheese" arc, tho. If you argue within its scope, you should allow the opposing side to introduce cosmic cheese themselves.

Originally posted by abhilegend
By cosmic cheese, I meant destroying planets and shit.

Destroying a planet isn't cosmic cheese.. Partially lifting a book (which someone else solo lifted) of infinity pages is space cheese. Destroying a planet is cosmic cheese BWAHAHHAA

Originally posted by abhilegend
Because debating with feats about destroying planets and shit is boring! I can do that too, but I prefer character fights much more than these kind of feats. Honestly, if I went to space cheese route superman wouldn't lose a single fight on the forums to anyone below skyfathers.

Sucks you can't do that with your man-crush superman.. cause ya know.. he's never one shot a planet.. Shit... he tried to destroy a asteroid once and got KO'd for his troubles. Ooo yeah.. it was one tough asteroid huh?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Kid, I was talking about your claim that Kyle feat was better than any absorbtion feat by any annihilator. That is your stance correct?

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Destroying a planet isn't cosmic cheese.. Partially lifting a book (which someone else solo lifted) of infinity pages is space cheese. Destroying a planet is cosmic cheese BWAHAHHAA

He already said he'd go feat-to-feat, tho. Best to quit being personal and simply bring it.

Edit. Meant that for KT and Quan. 😛

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Sucks you can't do that with your man-crush superman.. cause ya know.. he's never one shot a planet.. Shit... he tried to destroy a asteroid once and got KO'd for his troubles. Ooo yeah.. it was one tough asteroid huh?

Originally posted by abhilegend
.
Quit while you're ahead. This wouldn't go well for you.

Originally posted by Nibedicus
He already said he'd go feat-to-feat, tho. Best to quit being personal and simply bring it.

Edit. Meant that for KT and Quan. :

Originally posted by abhilegend
Kid, I was talking to an adult. You think someone in annihilators have better energy manipulation feat than containing a portion of Big Bang? ****ing lulz.
Quit while you're ahead. This wouldn't go well for you.

So you don't know the absorbtion feats of Thor then? When didn't you just say so, instead of pretending like you do and that Kyle's is the best of anybody on the field. Side note: How much of the big bang did he contain again?

Quit what... would you care to post superman one shotting a planet? Or would you prefer showing him getting KO'd by an asteroid.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So you don't know the absorbtion feats of Thor then? When didn't you just say so, instead of pretending like you do and that Kyle's is the best of anybody on the field. Side note: How much of the big bang did he contain again?

Quit what... would you care to post superman one shotting a planet? Or would you prefer showing him getting KO'd by an asteroid.

You can't even lowball properly and I've shown you scans of superman and Kal-L destroying earth on both here and herochat.

Earth was one shot by KAl-L... You don't say... Please post the scans again please. Should I post him getting getting by the dark matter asteroid?