Ultimate Wizard Battle

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you believe Harry flat out overpowered Voldemort's wand with his raw power ? Nothing else involved, right ?

Seeing how that really wasn't Voldemort's wand to begin, it certainly is within the realm of possibility. We don't know for sure though which has been my point all along.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Just like the avada kedavra can fail to kill with the special circumstances we see in the movies. Context is everything and is lost on you.

Don't go off on tangents now. That doesn't have anything to do with this discussion.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Seeing how that really wasn't Voldemort's wand to begin, it certainly is within the realm of possibility. We don't know for sure though which has been my point all along.

Don't go off on tangents now. That doesn't have anything to do with this discussion.

You won't 'answer the question because you know what the answer is. The wand linked up against Voldemort's due to their connection. It's obvious so quit avoiding questions and being dense on purpose. Or do you believe Harry Potter is just flat out more powerful than Voldemort ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Due to their location but the blast just knocks people off their feet. They were also unprepared for the attack as well so there is that. The blast in and of itself outside locale is just a push.

Voldemort doesn't possess superhuman physical durability.

Being blown off his feet a few meters and landing on his head will at least disorient him, allowing Gandalf to use telekinesis to pummel Voldemort into paste, obviously.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You won't 'answer the question because you know what the answer is. The wand linked up against Voldemort's due to their connection. It's obvious so quit avoiding questions and being dense on purpose. Or do you believe Harry Potter is just flat out more powerful than Voldemort ?

Your question is irrelevant to the discussion so it doesn't warrant a response. I am not avoiding anything neither am I being dense, both of which are your trademarks. Harry Potter being more powerful than the wand Voldemort borrowed is certainly feasible so I don't see a problem with that interpretation however, just as I said before, we don't know for sure and we don't need to know because that particular instance shows us that wands aren't indestructible during duels in opposition to your stance.

Originally posted by NemeBro
Voldemort doesn't possess superhuman physical durability.

Being blown off his feet a few meters and landing on his head will at least disorient him, allowing Gandalf to use telekinesis to pummel Voldemort into paste, obviously.

We saw Gandalf use tk on Saruman. Saruman had a few minor cuts and was pushed down. Gandalf lost. Gandalf didn't kill anyone with that tk business you ridiculous fanboi.

Gandalf will look for the nearest tree and pray for more pinecones to toss. 😂

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Your question is irrelevant to the discussion so it doesn't warrant a response. I am not avoiding anything neither am I being dense, both of which are your trademarks. Harry Potter being more powerful than the wand Voldemort borrowed is certainly feasible so I don't see a problem with that interpretation however, just as I said before, we don't know for sure and we don't need to know because that particular instance shows us that wands aren't indestructible during duels in opposition to your stance.

The connection had Harry meet Voldemort's wand head on. If you deny this you're a troll. If you think Harry's more powerful you're a troll. You want to pretend it's something else entirely just because you didn't grasp the scene, shortbus.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The connection had Harry meet Voldemort's wand head on. If you deny this you're a troll. If you think Harry's more powerful you're a troll. You want to pretend it's something else entirely just because you didn't grasp the scene, shortbus.

Seeing how you've now resorted to calling me a troll because you don't have any real arguments left, yeah, I'd say:

Originally posted by quanchi112
Concession accepted.

Ciao.

Edit: It wasn't even Voldemort's wand to begin with, a point you have missed from the very beginning.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Seeing how you've now resorted to calling me a troll because you don't have any real arguments left, yeah, I'd say:

Ciao.

Edit: It wasn't even Voldemort's wand to begin with, a point you have missed from the very beginning.

I never said it was but the two wizards still shared a bond. That's why Harry's wand found Voldemort's. It's not that Harry simply overpowered him. You avoisd this question because you know I am right. Deep down you are going to leave because you lost.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it was but the two wizards still shared a bond. That's why Harry's wand found Voldemort's. It's not that Harry simply overpowered him. You avoisd this question because you know I am right.

So you admit that you were wrong in presuming I thought that Voldemort was weaker than Harry and deliberately misinterpreted my stance throughout? I think I could forgive you for that transgression. What I can't tolerate is your continued denial of the fact that since Harry's wand and the borrowed wand didn't share any special connections, and since the borrowed wand still got blasted to smithereens, that somehow doesn't mean that wands aren't indestructible during combat.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Deep down you are going to leave because you lost.

This sh1t is wasted on me. Try this routine with someone for whom it actually works.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
So you admit that you were wrong in presuming I thought that Voldemort was weaker than Harry and deliberately misinterpreted my stance throughout? I think I could forgive you for that transgression. What I can't tolerate is your continued denial of the fact that since Harry's wand and the borrowed wand didn't share any special connections, and since the borrowed wand still got blasted to smithereens, that somehow doesn't mean that wands aren't indestructible during combat.

This sh1t is wasted on me. Try this routine with someone for whom it actually works.

The wands are conduits to the mage. They shared the connection you colossal boob. Answer the question. Is Harry more powerful than Voldemort ?

You stated you were gone and then came back to argue some more. Get your house in order and get back to me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The wands are conduits to the mage. They shared the connection you colossal boob. Answer the question. Is Harry more powerful than Voldemort ?

You stated you were gone and then came back to argue some more. Get your house in order and get back to me.

Only the wands which choose the wizard. Not borrowed wands. Stop going of on irrelevant tangents about who is more powerful between Harry and Voldemort.

I mentioned "Ciao", nowhere did I claim that I would be gone. You don't get to dictate which thread I post on or whom I respond to.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Only the wands which choose the wizard. Not borrowed wands. Stop going of on irrelevant tangents about who is more powerful between Harry and Voldemort.

I mentioned "Ciao", nowhere did I claim that I would be gone. You don't get to dictate which thread I post on or whom I respond to.

So you don't believe they had a connection at all despite Harry having a piece of Voldemort's soul in him ? You believe Harry was just being a badass and pretending he was weak during the flight.

What does ciao mean to you ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you don't believe they had a connection at all despite Harry having a piece of Voldemort's soul in him ? You believe Harry was just being a badass and pretending he was weak during the flight.

What does ciao mean to you ?

I believe that wands aren't indestructible during duels as you have alluded to throughout the entirety of this thread. Your other questions are meaningless.

Going off on tangents suits you, I see.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
I believe that wands aren't indestructible during duels as you have alluded to throughout the entirety of this thread. Your other questions are meaningless.

Going off on tangents suits you, I see.

I never said they were either. Context is everything though. You won't answer the question because it destroys your it could have been this weak ass responses.

Gandalf can only destroy wizards wands/staffs he is more powerful than. Voldemort is a helluva lot more powerful than he is.

Keep dodging the questions. No wonder you don't debate often you are quite abysmal at it.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said they were either. Context is everything though. You won't answer the question because it destroys your it could have been this weak ass responses.

You did allude to the idea throughout the entirety of this thread. You're selectively amnesiac if you think you didn't. Wands are twigs stuffed with magical animal parts, that can be broken both in and out of combat situations. This much is an established fact which is indisputable.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Gandalf can only destroy wizards wands/staffs he is more powerful than. Voldemort is a helluva lot more powerful than he is..

Based on?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Keep dodging the questions. No wonder you don't debate often you are quite abysmal at it.

Keep baiting and going off on irrelevant tangents. No wonder you get your ass handed to you in every debate you take part in. Including this one.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You did allude to the idea throughout the entirety of this thread. You're selectively amnesiac if you think you didn't. Wands are twigs stuffed with magical animal parts, that can be broken both in and out of combat situations. This much is an established fact which is indisputable.

Based on?

Keep baiting and going off on irrelevant tangents. No wonder you get your ass handed to you in every debate you take part in. Including this one.

In Harry's case thosecircumstances don't apply to Gandalf. I never once said they were indestructible.

Voldemort's feats in the movies. One shot kill power. Breaking the hogwarts protective shield when he got angry. Gandalf has no feats even close.

You won't answer a simple question. It proves you don't even believe what you type, mistress death.

Originally posted by quanchi112
In Harry's case those circumstances don't apply to Gandalf. I never once said they were indestructible.

You implied it throughout the argument with everyone who made the case against the wands' durability. Ask any reasonable person, and they'll call out your bluff.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort's feats in the movies. One shot kill power. Breaking the hogwarts protective shield when he got angry. Gandalf has no feats even close.

Arguments can be made for both characters, but to claim that one is "a helluva lot more powerful" than the other is definitive trolling.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You won't answer a simple question. It proves you don't even believe what you type, mistress death.

You really want an answer? Fine, here's my answer: "Groot!"

Originally posted by Robtard
"Bravmorda wins via pig power"?

😱

Oh my God, how'd I miss this?

YouTube video

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You implied it throughout the argument with everyone who made the case against the wands' durability. Ask any reasonable person, and they'll call out your bluff.

Arguments can be made for both characters, but to claim that one is "a helluva lot more powerful" than the other is definitive trolling.

You really want an answer? Fine, here's my answer: [b]"Groot!" [/B]

Gandalf can only due so to wizards weaker in power. Voldemort isn't and in his case that was due to him wielding a someone else's wand and his connection with Harry.

No, it isn't. Look at Voldemort smashing up that colllective energy prison over Hogwarts. That was him showing superiority to all those other mages with his power. Give me Gandalf's biggest display of power. Let's compare, nerd.

I know who you are. You won't answer it due to being scurred.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Gandalf can only due so to wizards weaker in power. Voldemort isn't and in his case that was due to him wielding a someone else's wand and his connection with Harry.

There is more than enough proof to show that wands can be broken both in and out of duels. This much has been established. If you continue to ignore this then you concede by proxy. If you deny this then you concede outright. Choice is yours.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it isn't. Look at Voldemort smashing up that colllective energy prison over Hogwarts. That was him showing superiority to all those other mages with his power. Give me Gandalf's biggest display of power. Let's compare, nerd.

The funny thing is that I actually favor Voldemort in a battle between the 2. And because of that, I'll punish you by ignoring your dweebish questions and queries.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I know who you are. You won't answer it due to being scurred.

If you really know who I am then it would be wise for you to back down as long as you still have a chance. Don't make me get my hands dirty.