Ultimate Wizard Battle

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
😆 Rabbits hunting lions is more believable than herochat's prom queen "raping" anyone.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You really need to calm down, brah. I mean while I would expect you to crumble when up against me, this display of paranoid schizophrenia almost makes even me pity you.

Another non-argument. Guess I won't be getting any proof, seeing how there is none for you to save face.

I thought I replied to this in my previous post. I guess inbred specimens like you need repetitions in order to get the point across:

So basically speaking, you're making an argument from intuition where a wand would easily resist being being destroyed because it's a "conduit" for the wizard's power(another unproven hypothesis of yours), based on which you dismiss the opposing argument which is based on factual evidence from the movies themselves. I am hardly surprised as this isn't the first time you've gone to lalaland in order to (unsuccessfully, I might add)twist your way out of the corner you've been forced into.

Flawed strawman. Gandalf isn't an HP mage, dumbo. He has already demonstrated that he'll rely on a strategy that HP wizards almost never even think of while in battle. I am using your logic to showcase that since we've never seen Dumbledore perform that type of magic, hence surely he is incapable of doing so. How does it feel to have a taste of your own poisonous medicine?

Robtard's opinion on this discussion is just about as relevant as dadudemon's, since they both focus on only minute points that aren't really relevant to the crux of the argument.

You called me a nerd whose knowledge of Harry Potter only came from wikis, yet you yourself rely on wikis. What a hypocrite you are.

I can actually define apparition while you don't even know what it is. The black smoke is flight evidenced by Voldemort and Snape as well. But since you won't respond then I have no choice but to accept your concession.

It's supported by the movies since the only reason Harry destroyed Voldemort's wand was due to the connection not an overpowering. Dumbledore is more powerful than Harry and can't destroy Voldemort's wand even while he wielded the elder wand. You don't have a leg to stand on, sport.

I never said Dumbledore is incapable only that he won't do so. I argue based on what these characters do in battle based on the movies. Not just oh yeah he might do this or that. I never said he's incapable of doing so. You are such a troll. Gandalf lets the opposing mage strike first as well. This is ending quickly.

Robtard didn't weigh in on the apparition part. That's the point. Da knows you're a troll and won't respond to you. You're lucky I do you simpleton.

The reason I used a wikipedia is because you said no online source supports this. I googled it and this was the first hit. LOL. You're dumb. Epic stupity.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller

In the movies, apparition was portrayed as a Death Eater turning into a black mist and travelling to their required destination. Literally every blog, forum and other Harry Potter related online sources note this difference between the book apparition and movie apparition.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Please live in the now. One thread on herochat like 3 years ago is what you still keep going on about. You need a life. You continue to reference 3 year old threads concerning me. I feel sorry for you, guy.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I can actually define apparition while you don't even know what it is. The black smoke is flight evidenced by Voldemort and Snape as well. But since you won't respond then I have no choice but to accept your concession.

Originally posted by quanchi112

It's supported by the movies since the only reason Harry destroyed Voldemort's wand was due to the connection not an overpowering. Dumbledore is more powerful than Harry and can't destroy Voldemort's wand even while he wielded the elder wand. You don't have a leg to stand on, sport.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I never said Dumbledore is incapable only that he won't do so. I argue based on what these characters do in battle based on the movies. Not just oh yeah he might do this or that. I never said he's incapable of doing so. You are such a troll. Gandalf lets the opposing mage strike first as well. This is ending quickly.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Robtard didn't weigh in on the apparition part. That's the point. Da knows you're a troll and won't respond to you. You're lucky I do you simpleton.

Originally posted by quanchi112

The reason I used a wikipedia is because you said no online source supports this. I googled it and this was the first hit. LOL. You're dumb. Epic stupity.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Submission accepted.

Whatever you need to tell yourself to get by, my submissive little quanshe.[/B]

What is also supported by the movies is that wands can be broken by living trees, by children, including the most powerful one ever in existence. Prove that a wizard needs to be more powerful in order to overpower another's wand in a duel. Dumbledore didn't even aim at destroying Voldemort's wand because that is something which never occurs to HP wizards during duels. This much has been pointed out to you before yet you continue to ignore it.[/B]

You didn't say that, your flawgic did. We never see HP mages aim at trying to destroy another wizard's wand during a duel so it instantly implies that they are incapable of doing so in combat. We never see Dumbledore use AKs, Imperios or Crucios during a duel so that implies he can't do so in combat either. It's clear that you get some sort of twisted pleasure out of cornering yourself into a pit full of pitbulls.
[/B]

ddm did respond to me whenever I specifically addressed him. You don't even know what you're talking about. And if Robtard's opinion doesn't matter, ddm's doesn't either.[/B]

Nope I stated that that particular ability of the Death Eaters and order members alike is referred as apparition("half-apparition" to be exact) on wiki and most other online sources. You just validated my claim by responding as you did to it. [/B]

Originally posted by quanchi112
You're delusional and forgettable. I have already won. You aren't even original. That's the sad part. You bring nothing new to the table. If you were a color you'd be clear.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Yes, when you're the master of your own wand you can easily break it. You can't easily break it if someone else is wielding it against you. That's the point which keeps escaping your orko-ish brain. I know you can't overpower and destroy wands in the Hpotter universe outside the circumstances discussed. You justsank your own argument.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I never said Dumbledore is incapable of those curses I said he won't use them so it's neither here nor there. The reason we don't see mages do so is because it cannot happen. That's the point outside those circumstances.

Originally posted by quanchi112

DDM knows you're a troll. He also agrees they flew. Robtard hasn't weighed in on that. So 2-1. LOL.

Originally posted by quanchi112

No, the movies are clearly different. Whatever you want to pretend it is it's the same thing which Voldemort and Snape both do in the movies. That's the point. You can pretend it isn't flight because you're an idiot but I like idiotic posters who won't admit they are wrong. It's awesome.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You submit yet again, proving my dominance over you. You'll always be the submissive little quanshe.

Tell that to Hermione who broke Harry's wand. Or the Whomping Willow that broke Ron's wand. That's the problem with basing your arguments on an unproven hypothesis that goes completely against the factual evidence. It ends up crumbling the moment you try and apply it in the debate. Just like it has been going for you throughout this "discussion" of ours.

Of course you didn't. Your flawgic did, as pointed out to you before. So you confirm my position that you're going off on intuition by saying that since we don't usually see it happen that means that it can't. Well, then since Dumbledore never performs unforgivable curses in the series that means it can't happen. You doomed yourself from the moment you tried to quaneuver around this mess. You're cornered and alone in the pit full of pitbulls. No help is coming any time soon.

Robtard knows you're a troll. He agrees that Gandalf can smash Voldemort's wand in battle. So 2-2. Stalemate is the best you can hope against me, 'sport'.

You proved my point for me. You showcased yourself as a hypocrite by using a wiki when you accuse me of being a nerd whose knowledge of Harry Potter comes solely from the movies. Repent, and you'll be forgiven. Continue with these quananigans and I, Thanos of Titan, shall smite you with the righteous power of Death that is mine. Afterall, killing unnatural unkillables like yourself(courtesy of your horcruxes) is what I do best. And what I do best ain't very nice for the likes of you.

If you physically get the wand sure, but then that means the other person isn't wielding it. LOL. Around and around you go.

I never said he can't I said he won't. We argue based off what's in character. This isn't powerset debating so you trying to put words in my mouth is just another predictable troll tactic.

Robtard thinks Gandalf wins so he doesn't agree with you. You say Voldemort wins he thinks Gandalf wins. How can you always be confused ? Seriously.

I provided a link because you said one didn't exist. First link said otherwise. I made my decision off of the movies. The first entry I clicked on proved my superior brain to your smaller feminine brain.

The best part is you seem to want to cling to Thanos now. You are just a stable boy. Forgettable. Slow witted. Confused. Hypocritical.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You concede. I accept. Insults are a cheap parlor trick by trolls such as yourself. Da called you spot on.

Originally posted by quanchi112

If you physically get the wand sure, but then that means the other person isn't wielding it. LOL. Around and around you go.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I never said he can't I said he won't. We argue based off what's in character. This isn't powerset debating so you trying to put words in my mouth is just another predictable troll tactic.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Robtard thinks Gandalf wins so he doesn't agree with you. You say Voldemort wins he thinks Gandalf wins. How can you always be confused ? Seriously.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I provided a link because you said one didn't exist. First link said otherwise. I made my decision off of the movies. The first entry I clicked on proved my superior brain to your smaller feminine brain.

Originally posted by quanchi112

The best part is you seem to want to cling to Thanos now. You are just a stable boy. Forgettable. Slow witted. Confused. Hypocritical.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
You never tire of submitting to me, my faithful little quanshe.

Ron was wielding it when the Whomping Willow smashed it. The same way as Gandalf is going to smash Voldemort's wand in this thread.

Who said anything about a powerset debate? Or do you deliberately take others' statements out of context? It's pretty clear and simple: your flawgic tells us that since we never see HP mages attempt to destroy another's wand therefore it means that they can't. By that same line of thought, since we never see Dumbledore perform any of the Unforgivable Curses, that means he can't. The pitbulls are closing in, and there is no escape.

Robtard agrees that Gandalf could smash Voldemort's wand in battle. Ergo, Robtard agrees with me on this point. I win. Again.

Nope, all that you did was prove my claim about apparition being portrayed in a somewhat different manner in the movies as opposed to the books. The Final Truth: I am the dom and you're my sub.

I am Thanos, you silly goose.

Yes, I never said another physical object couldn't break it. The point is you need to hit it with something or catch the mage unaware since they can block attacks with their wands. Gandalf only did so to Saruman who is less powerful than Gandalf. Voldemort is clearly more powerful than Gandalf. We see the same tactic work against Gandalf. LOL.

You might not have said a powerset debate but that's what you're essentially arguing for. You unlike myself cannot put 2 and 2 together. It means that isn't how the magic works. The only reason it worked was because of Harry's connection. That's painfully obvious, kiddo. Dumbledore doesn't use killing curses nor did I said he couldn't. I said he won't so it isn't worth bringing up. Your logic sucks.

Robtard thinks Gandalf wins by doing so. You don't agree. DDM thinks you're wrong, a troll, and believes deatheaters can fly.

If it's different then it's different. You obviously can't think outside the books. You are now changing your story. We see Voldemort and Snape fly in the same manner as the deatheaters. That's the best part. You can continue to shut your eyes and pretend.

You are now single white quan. I am enjoying this, poster formerly known as mistress death. You and the mask have a lot in common.

Why does Gandalf smashing Voldemort's wand matter? Vold doesn't need his wand for some spells. Also the fact that people think Gandalf is going to quickdraw Vold is ludicrous.

Originally posted by quanchi112
You conceded. I accepted.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Yes, I never said another physical object couldn't break it. The point is you need to hit it with something or catch the mage unaware since they can block attacks with their wands. Gandalf only did so to Saruman who is less powerful than Gandalf. Voldemort is clearly more powerful than Gandalf. We see the same tactic work against Gandalf. LOL.

Originally posted by quanchi112

You might not have said a powerset debate but that's what you're essentially arguing for. You unlike myself cannot put 2 and 2 together. It means that isn't how the magic works. The only reason it worked was because of Harry's connection. That's painfully obvious, kiddo. Dumbledore doesn't use killing curses nor did I said he couldn't. I said he won't so it isn't worth bringing up. Your logic sucks.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Robtard thinks Gandalf wins by doing so. You don't agree. DDM thinks you're wrong, a troll, and believes deatheaters can fly.

Originally posted by quanchi112

If it's different then it's different. You obviously can't think outside the books. You are now changing your story. We see Voldemort and Snape fly in the same manner as the deatheaters. That's the best part. You can continue to shut your eyes and pretend.

Originally posted by quanchi112

You are now single white quan. I am enjoying this, poster formerly known as mistress death. You and the mask have a lot in common.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
In your dreams, brah.

But the point is that you need to prove this point with actual evidence from the movies themselves. And the actual evidence from the movies themselves go against this ridiculous idea of yours that wands become auto-indestructible in combat. All that you're doing at this point is repeating the same old lazy explanations that crumble in the face of the overwhelming evidence that makes you the submissive little quanshe that you are.

Reading comprehension fail. I don't even know where you're getting this "powerset debate" idea from. I am using your own flawgic that since we don't see something happen on-screen, therefore it cannot happen. I mean that's precisely what you've been claiming so far. We don't see HP mages go for blowing up their opponent's want, hence they can't do so. Therefore since we don't see Dumbledore perform Unforgivable Curses on-screen, therefore he can't. You're cornered, alone and the pitbulls are licking their lips in anticipation of the kill. There is no hope for escape now.

Irrelevant. Robtard thinks that Gandalf can smash Voldemort's wand, just as I do so. Robtard thinks you're a troll as well. Which you obviously are. I win again.

Nope. You're trying to twist my stance just to save face over the fact that you confirmed my claim about how apparition is interpreted differently in the movies than in the books. On top of that you used wiki to do so. You proved yourself a hypocrite seeing how you accuse me of being a nerd whose knowledge of the HPverse comes solely from the wikis.

😆The paranoid schizophrenia all over again. You never change, my submissive little quanshe.

I backed my claim pages ago. You need to prove Gandalf is more powerful than Voldemort. Back your claim or concede.

I only use what happens on screen to show what's in character for these characters to perform. Voldemort is a dark wizard so the kill curse is something we can expect from him. This isn't the case with Dumbledore. He's a good guy.

He disagrees with the outcome. He doesn't agree with you. DDM agrees with me. You aren't even bright enough to bring up anything that really supports you.

You said no link went along with me. Wiki does. You're wrong a thousand times over. My knowledge is backed by wikis. Nothing backs your twisted version of the movies. You want to cite the books because you're an idiot.

It's obvious. You're pathetic. Voldemort wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's too late. What's done is done.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I backed my claim pages ago. You need to prove Gandalf is more powerful than Voldemort. Back your claim or concede.

Originally posted by quanchi112

I only use what happens on screen to show what's in character for these characters to perform. Voldemort is a dark wizard so the kill curse is something we can expect from him. This isn't the case with Dumbledore. He's a good guy.

Originally posted by quanchi112

He disagrees with the outcome. He doesn't agree with you. DDM agrees with me. You aren't even bright enough to bring up anything that really supports you.

Originally posted by quanchi112

You said no link went along with me. Wiki does. You're wrong a thousand times over. My knowledge is backed by wikis. Nothing backs your twisted version of the movies. You want to cite the books because you're an idiot.

Originally posted by quanchi112

It's obvious. You're pathetic. Voldemort wins.

Concession, not submission.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Yup, it's too late to take back your submission to me. I agree that is indeed done.

Nope, all you did was make up this twisted scenario of a wizard needing to be more powerful in order to break another's wand. You deny all the evidence to the contrary, and cite the fact that we don't see these wizards go for such a move in the movies as your reason for this baseless assumption. You cower and submit like the cowardly, submissive quanshe that you are.

Of course you do, but your flawgic does something else. Basically speaking, you admit that it's not in character for HP mages to break their opponent's wand in combat, not that they can't. Grieve in your pathetic demise, as the pitbulls ravenously devour your ragged carcass.

He agrees that Voldemort's wand gets smashed when up against Gandalf. You lack any semblance of reading comprehension.

Always the beloved little hypocrite. You call others nerds whose knowledge comes solely from wikis, and when backed into a corner, you cite a wiki as your evidence. You, the biggest idiot to tread any forum on this site, doesn't deserve to call anyone else an idiot.

Submission accepted. Again.

That's the case in the LOTR universe. Voldemort's wand was broken due to the connection both he and Harry shared. A much more powerful wizards locked streams with Voldemort with the most powerful wand in existence and failed to do so.

Dumbledore locked streams with Voldemort and it did no such thing. We also see Voldemort's wand resist him since he wasn't the rightful owner. Power doesn't have a thing to do with it. I have to hand it to you though you don't understand either series magic. Hooray for consistency.

You disagree with the outcome meaning you don't agree with him. DDM is my wingman in this life and the next, trollboy.

My knowledge is gathered from my superior brain stem while yours is gathered from what your mother tells you. Point is you said no other site existed and I wiki'd you to pieces. Condolences.

Look up the word submission or ask your mother. I tire of your ignorance.

As you agree Voldemort wins.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I see you don't know the difference between submission and concession. You don't even use the word submission correctly. I will add it to the list of words you don't know the meaning of; apparate, submission, etc.

Originally posted by quanchi112

That's the case in the LOTR universe. Voldemort's wand was broken due to the connection both he and Harry shared. A much more powerful wizards locked streams with Voldemort with the most powerful wand in existence and failed to do so.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Dumbledore locked streams with Voldemort and it did no such thing. We also see Voldemort's wand resist him since he wasn't the rightful owner. Power doesn't have a thing to do with it. I have to hand it to you though you don't understand either series magic. Hooray for consistency.

Originally posted by quanchi112

You disagree with the outcome meaning you don't agree with him. DDM is my wingman in this life and the next, trollboy.

Originally posted by quanchi112

My knowledge is gathered from my superior brain stem while yours is gathered from what your mother tells you. Point is you said no other site existed and I wiki'd you to pieces. Condolences.

Originally posted by quanchi112

Look up the word submission or ask your mother. I tire of your ignorance.

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
Submission accepted . Again. You continually reaffirm the fact that I am the dom and you're the sub in our interactions.

Again, prove that a wizard needs to be more powerful to do so in combat. Breaking another's wand in a duel is an out-of-character move for an HP-mage(according to your flawgic anyways). Prove that it's because they lack sufficient power to do so. Prove that wands become aut-indestructible during duel, instead of just claiming it. I see a whole lot of baseless assumptions and very little proof whenever I read your posts.

Dumbledore never used the Unforgivable Curses. Ergo he's incapable of doing it. That's not me talking , that's your flawgic talking which tells us that HP wzards never utilize wand-breaking spells in combat therefore that means they can't. The pitbulls are mauling and tearing you apart just for the fun of it, post-mortem.

Robtard agreed that wands can be broken in combat. He agrees that you're a troll. I win again.

So you agree that you're a hypocrite. Being the submissive little quanshe that you are, that's hardly a surprise.

Another submission on your part. I gladly accept. And I'll be sure to ask your mother for the definition, once I am finished banging her to double digit orgasms!

In the HPotterverse wands don't break to being overpowered. In LOTR they do. The problem is in the LOTR verse Gandalf was more powerful than Saruman. That isn't the case here. Now quit acting like a brick wall and conceded here like you did in the opening part of your post.

I never once said the unforgivable curses were beyond his power I merely said it's out of character for him to do so. You tried unsuccessfully mind you to put words in my mouth. You're a fool's fool.

DDM agrees with my outcome and my position. Robtard thinks your outcome is wrong. You brought up someone who disagrees with you. Talk about dumb.

You can't even form a joke on your own. This to me shows the lack of brain function one more time. Please seek help, trollboy.

Voldemort wins.