Ultimate Wizard Battle

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, stop lying; you've not seen Th Hobbit. Watch it and then get back in my thread with a little objectivity.

Until then, GTFO with your fanboy nonsense.

Listen, googling and using Wikipedia to get some scenes so you can low-ball is your thing, but watch the damn film before you make up your mind.

Again, GTFO out my thread until.

Originally posted by Robtard
Listen, googling and using Wikipedia to get some scenes so you can low-ball is your thing, but watch the damn film before you make up your mind.

Again, GTFO out my thread until.

Lying queer, GTFO of my thread before I report you.

Originally posted by Robtard
Lying queer, GTFO of my thread before I report you.

Originally posted by quanchi112
. Yes, I call a kill spell as your first move a fight. I call a kill spell in the woods a fight. You want to disregard every time he's used it. The guy uses the spell all the time yet you want to pretend he doesn't due to your own personal bias. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I don't, because there isn't really alot of fighting too it now is there? For instance against Dumbledore, the most powerful opponent Voldemort have faced the killing Curse wasn't used a single time. Why do you think that is so?

You call using a spell against a unarmed opponent a fight? I think we have very different definitions of what a fight is then Quanchi.

That Quanchi is pathetic, this have nothing to do with personal bias but everything to do with the fact that none of the incidents you mentioned can be observed as a magical duel. Voldemort killing Harry in the Woods in the seventh film isn't a magical duel, Voldemort using the killing curse in the Goblin of Fire however would be a example of Voldemort using the killing curse in magical duel. And furthermore I'm not saying that Voldemort doesn't use the Killing Curse that was never my statement, my statement was just how often Voldemort opens with the killing Curse against a opponent in a magical duel, and he really doesn't do so at all. Saying that he doesn't open with it, isn't the same as saying he doesn't use it. Learn to distinguish.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Explain to me how I am lying. I also like the females sorry about your luck. Oh yeah he did the creepy shadow thing to intimidate the dwarves. I forgot how he bullies the smaller folk when people bring him to anger.

Check out the look on Gandalf's face at :22.

YouTube video

Epic gay.

Originally posted by Utrigita
I don't, because there isn't really alot of fighting too it now is there? For instance against Dumbledore, the most powerful opponent Voldemort have faced the killing Curse wasn't used a single time. Why do you think that is so?

You call using a spell against a unarmed opponent a fight? I think we have very different definitions of what a fight is then Quanchi.

That Quanchi is pathetic, this have nothing to do with personal bias but everything to do with the fact that none of the incidents you mentioned can be observed as a magical duel. Voldemort killing Harry in the Woods in the seventh film isn't a magical duel, Voldemort using the killing curse in the Goblin of Fire however would be a example of Voldemort using the killing curse in magical duel. And furthermore I'm not saying that Voldemort doesn't use the Killing Curse that was never my statement, my statement was just how often Voldemort opens with the killing Curse against a opponent in a magical duel, and he really doesn't do so at all. Saying that he doesn't open with it, isn't the same as saying he doesn't use it. Learn to distinguish.

He uses it against his opponents. These are his opponents. You are trying to disregard the other instances because it cripples your argument. He doesn't even need to start out by tossing them around. Against Dumbledore he was his most impressive it's just Dumbledore was his closest thing to an equal while possessing the elder wand. Voldemort still knocked him on his ass while being in control of the fight.

Voldemort would be all over these other wizards from the get.

Actually, I have to agree with Quanchi that Avada Kedavra is likely the opening move of Voldemort, and the spell he will spam is the Killing Curse. Didn't I attempt to prove that to you Quan during that Yoda vs. Voldemort Battlezone to show why Yoda would win?

But it wouldn't matter against Gandalf. Gandalf can just blind Voldemort and burn his wand simultaneously and instantaneously like he did against Aragorn/Gimli/Legolas in the Two Towers.

Originally posted by -kV-
Actually, I have to agree with Quanchi that Avada Kedavra is likely the opening move of Voldemort, and the spell he will spam is the Killing Curse. Didn't I attempt to prove that to you Quan during that Yoda vs. Voldemort Battlezone to show why Yoda would win?

But it wouldn't matter against Gandalf. Gandalf can just blind Voldemort and burn his wand simultaneously and instantaneously like he did against Aragorn/Gimli/Legolas in the Two Towers.

I think you did but it was so long ago I can barely remember.

LoL, "Gandalf's magic can only affect non mages!!!!!1!" Gimping fool. Pathetic tactics.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He never did so against another mage. I don't think he can do so to Voldemort's wand. Gandalf doesn't really have any long range offensive power either. Voldemort's long ranged game is too lethal for Gandalf to deal with.

I think you did but it was so long ago I can barely remember.

He telepathically was burning the metal hilt of Aragorn's sword...he easily can do the same for a wooden wand.

And exactly how far will those two be? Gandalf can just blind Voldemort.

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, "Gandalf's magic can only affect non mages!!!!!1!" Gimping fool. Pathetic tactics.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So despite mages able to easily produce fire and the fact Gandalf burned a non mages sword he could have done so against Saruman ? GTFO.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So despite mages able to easily produce fire and the fact Gandalf burned a non mages sword he could have done so against Saruman ? GTFO.

"Voldermort can cast fire-based spells, ergo Voldermort is immune to fire!"

You silly baboon, that's an even more stupid argument than your previous, just stop.

P.S. you quoted yourself and debated yourself above. Loon.

Originally posted by Robtard
"Voldermort can cast fire-based spells, ergo Voldermort is immune to fire!"

You silly baboon, that's an even more stupid argument than your previous, just stop.

P.S. you quoted yourself and debated yourself above. Loon.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said he's immune to fire but the wands are different than a non mages weapons. I guess you think if fire comes out of a wand it should burn up never to be used again.

Gandalf didn't do so to any mage so it's not a viable tactic to someone with magical powers of their own.

What amazing and sound logic, you've convinced me. We can now prove that guns are immune to bullets, because bullets "come out" of guns. Brilliant Quano, utterly brilliant.

LoL, wut? Did you just imply that Gandalf never attacked another magic user?

Originally posted by Robtard
What amazing and sound logic, you've convinced me. We can now prove that guns are immune to bullets, because bullets "come out" of guns. Brilliant Quano, utterly brilliant.

LoL, wut? Did you just imply that Gandalf never attacked another magic user?

Gandalf has attacked other mages but not with the tactics you're rolling with. Gandalf never attacked an enemy in that fashion either. He did so to friends so out of character for him to use one feat against Voldemort anyway despite the fact it wouldn't work anyways.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Wands are different. If it's just a piece of wood it can't produce fire out of it. A wand has magical properties yet you think its just a piece of wood.

Gandalf has attacked other mages but not with the tactics you're rolling with. Gandalf never attacked an enemy in that fashion either. He did so to friends so out of character for him to use one feat against Voldemort anyway despite the fact it wouldn't work anyways.

Ah, back to the strawman arguments cos you can't debate against me. You're resorting to this tactic sooner and sooner.

Ah, the good ole "can only use specific attacks against the specific targets he's shown!" gimp. Clever, but that's not going to fly. No different than saying Gandalf couldn't cut down Voldermort with his sword because Gandalf's never seen cutting an HP wizard with it. Gimping clown.

I see quan getting the hate on this forum as well....mmm