Ultimate Wizard Battle

Started by quanchi11218 pages
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by TheGodKiller
That explanation was never given in the movie itself iirc. So no, that conclusively shows that wands can be broken in battles between multiple wizards.

Trying to use my own words against me I see. Try to be more original.

So despite it being the very reason Voldemort sought out another wand and the audience knowing that the connection between Harry and Voldemort was the reason Harry didn't die due to the Avada Kedavra you want to cry foul. Not on quan's watch.

You lost. Many have tried to wrestle with the lion on the mountain. Many have fallen. Count yourself among the dead.

Darth Truculent Truth is written in Blood

Stab Voldemort with a Morgol blade and he's toast. Actually anyone of them. Should have added in the Witch King of Angmar. Even Gandalf believed he couldn't beat him.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
Show me Gandalf setting a mage's wand on fire while they wield it against him ? That's your claim so back it up.

Which is you doing the silly "it has to be exact" argument YET AGAIN. No difference than you asking "show me Superman being immune to kitchen knife stab or he isn't", when we've seen Superman casually shrug off machine gun fire.

Gandalf super-heats swords and such, a thin wooden wand will be easy to ignite. Your precious Harry Potter wands aren't some indestructible objects as you like to imagine they are(teens snap them in twain). Put on your big-girl panties and deal with it already.

Casper Whitey Restricted

Potter wands can be broken. Ron's was broken in a car crash.

There.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Darth Truculent
Stab Voldemort with a Morgol blade and he's toast. Actually anyone of them. Should have added in the Witch King of Angmar. Even Gandalf believed he couldn't beat him.
He'd never get close enough to do so. Voldemort would destroy him.
Originally posted by Robtard
Which is you doing the silly "it has to be exact" argument YET AGAIN. No difference than you asking "show me Superman being immune to knife stab", when we've seen Superman casually shrug off machine gun fire.

Gandalf super-heats swords and such, a thin wooden wand will be easy to ignite. Your precious Harry Potter wands aren't some indestructible objects as you like to imagine they are(teens snap them in twain). Put on your big-girl panties and deal with it already.

The sword isn't a magical conduit which can shrug off magical attacks/effects. That's the difference it isn't the material it's the fact it's a conduit.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
The sword isn't a magical conduit which can shrug off magical attacks/effects. That's the difference it isn't the material it's the fact it's a conduit.

Yet Aragorn's sword couldn't be casually snapped in half like an HP wand by some teen. Deal with it.

Casper Whitey Restricted

Could the sword be transfigured?

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
Yet Aragorn's sword couldn't be casually snapped in half like an HP wand by some teen. Deal with it.
Because it was wood. The whole point if it's being wielded it then it's a conduit. You do know wood isn't as durable as steel, right ?

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
Because it was wood. The whole point if it's being wielded it then it's a conduit. You do know wood isn't as durable as steel, right ?

And it being a "conduit" doesn't mean it's somehow invulnerable, you silly ass. Haha, funny with the reversal. You're the one that is claiming Gandalf can't break/burn/affect what would be a weaker material to Aragorn's sword, nice attempt, but fail.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
And it being a "conduit" doesn't mean it's somehow invulnerable, you silly ass. Haha, funny with the reversal. You're the one that is claiming Gandalf can't break/burn/affect what would be a weaker material to Aragorn's sword, nice attempt, but fail.
Not with the wizard wielding it. That's the point otherwise why not destroy Saruman's staff in their first battle ? Answer--he can't unless he's more powerful than his mage opponent.

Robtard Senor Member

Proof that HP wands are indestructible while being held? Post it, or STFU already. Tired of your HP fanboy rants in every HP thread.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
Proof that HP wands are indestructible while being held? Post it, or STFU already. Tired of your HP fanboy rants in every HP thread.
If what you're saying is true why didn't Gandalf set Saruman's staff ablaze ? You're saying it's just a staff so back up your claim. Or is it you feel Gandalf is utterly moronic and stupid. Which is it ?

Robtard Senor Member

LoL, yet another dodge. Not surprised.

Gandalf The Grey didn't have that power, you idiot. Gandalf The White didn't need to do it in their second encounter.

Now stop dodging and prove that HP wands are indestructible while being held as you seem to think or STFU.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, yet another dodge. Not surprised.

Gandalf The Grey didn't have that power, you idiot. Gandalf The White didn't need to do it in their second encounter.

Now stop dodging and prove that HP wands are indestructible while being held as you seem to think or STFU.

So Gandalf didn't have the power to set things ablaze then ? Really ? Gandalf the white destroyed his staff due to superior power. The Witch King destroyed Gandalf's due to superior power. Only way you're destroying a mage's weapon in the LOTR universe.

They can't be burned by Gandalf's attack just like staffs can't be burned also. Did Gandalf's staff burn when Saruman shot the fireball down ?

Robtard Senor Member

So you can't prove that HP wands are indestructible while being held as you're claiming, but will continue with "HP wizards pwn all" rants regardless. Not surprised.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
So you can't prove that HP wands are indestructible while being held as you're claiming, but will continue with "HP wizards pwn all" rants regardless. Not surprised.
You can't even prove Gandalf can destroy another wizards staff in LOTR through flame. I pose questions to you while you recite the same garbage. You know you're beaten. Accept it.

Robtard Senor Member

You make claims and then dodge when asked for proof, this what you do.

quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
You make claims and then dodge when asked for proof, this what you do.
If you don't see the difference with an item used as a magical conduit and a piece of wood then you're an dimwit. To you they're the same. That's why you're a simple man.

Robtard Senor Member
Originally posted by quanchi112
If you don't see the difference with an item used as a magical conduit and a piece of wood then you're an dimwit. To you they're the same. That's why you're a simple man.
Originally posted by Robtard
And it being a "conduit" doesn't mean it's somehow invulnerable, you silly ass.
quanchi112 Disney

Originally posted by Robtard
If it isn't the same you have to prove it. You acknowledge this so why not prove it. I never said it was invulnerable I said someone of greater power has o do so such is the case in LOTR.