Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Without giving anything away..There are some huge parallels to the orginial series/films and the main 3 are clearly imitating the how the characters were originally portrayed.
Firstly I DID enjoy the film.
It was simply good fun.
However the "parallels" have me wondering whether Abrahams simply settled on a formula that worked for the original series out of laziness or homage?
I mean every time Kirk made a decision to do something you could automatically expect the "logical" rebuttal from Spock followed by the "Are you crazy?' speech from Bones.
The non-Trekkie sitting next to me started to groan anticipating Spock's "speeches".
Then there was that scene which was simply a reversal of roles between 2 characters based on the famous scene in Wraith/Khan.
Is this Abrahams being lazy or his nod to nostalgia?
Then there was also the free falling scene from JJ's 1st Star Trek duplicated again in the sequel...once again I have to wonder whether it's lazy story-telling or JJ just playing safe & smart?
And lastly, as another poster pointed out...it's convenient in the Star Trek Verse to have technology that suits the future but logically fails when it comes to action scenes. I mean to have a star ship that's powered by cells to give off radiation BUT NOT HAVE a drone/robot/droid to repair such equipment when it's damaged simply reflects drama in the story & not the technology.