Originally posted by -Pr-
is that the scan posted above? or something else?
Scan posted above.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
1.) HP/DD tanking the OE/OB =/= him being able to no sell the Disintegration Ray of the Armor or Mjolnir's energy projection or even the power of the Odin Force itself. Superman failing to damage missiles of an unknown substance means nothing as Superman couldn't damage Mjolnir, either barring ridiculous outlier feats that really mean jack shit in a versus thread. And if that's the case, then Mjolnir should get access to those feats as well.
How do you know Superman can't damage Mjolnir? Assuming he can't then how does that show Disintegrating beam>>>>>OE? What outlier feats? Explain what you mean?
2.) No limits fallacy doesn't work here.
No limit fallacy isn't invoked. The fact is DD does evolve greater resistance in battle. I didn't claim to what level he does it. The fact that DD not getting one shot means any additional attacks does less damage (or no damage). You can't ignore on panel evidence of DD evolving resistance countless times.
3.) Yes, it does. You would have to compare Superman's high end absolute best durability feats and compare them to Mjolnir's average instances or the ones where it has been damaged or destroyed outright to even come close to the idea that they're similar in durability. I don't even see how anyone can come to the conclusion that Superman is "close" in durability to the hammer. (and no, it's not because Superman is "flesh" and the hammer is "metal"😉. And harming Superman, even with ease beyond most of his other rogues in no means translates into harming Mjolnir, let alone the Destroyer Armor. That's, by far and away, the craziest idea spouted in this thread.
Mjolnir best feats of durability are below Superman's best feats of durability. I didn't suggest they are similar in durability. I'm suggesting that Mjolnir is not too far away. What's too far away is what you should be asking since this is not well defined.
I would say that Mjolnir is not more that 3x more durable than Superman. That's a very fair upper bound going by feats. Yes harming Superman with utmost ease definitely translates into damaging Mjolnir. Mjolnir has been damaged countless times in comics, it's far from indestructible (as well as Superman).
I have half a mind to make a "Mjolnir vs. Superman: Durability" thread just to debate that topic as to not get off track here.
That would be silly as no one is arguing that Superman is greater than or equal to Mjolnir in durability. But Superman isn't too far off. Adamantium/Mjolnir is much more durable than titanium, but so is Superman.