Originally posted by Silent MasterDestroyer was never shown or hinted to being more powerful depending on who's animating it. Extra abilities that was never shown prior doesn't mean more powerful. Certainly various writers had no intention of this. You guys are creating something writers had no intentions of. In other words, you are going against writers intentions.
Wait, so the Destroyer being shown to be more powerful based on what is animating it doesn't actually prove that the Destroyer's power varies based on the force animating it?
Originally posted by the DarkoneDo you know of Superman? You thinks destroyers armor is many times more durable than Superman? If so then show feats proving it. Don't show feats proving its more durable but feats showing more durable by MANY TIMES. Because it has to be in order for it to have a chance of not being damaged significantly by DD. Simply because DD penetrated Superman so easily.
Even on Sunday 🙂,The armor is to powerful for DD handle alone if it was just a human, as where Thor, Odin, Loki wear it, they can use their powers plus the armor and it's strength is increase too! Destroyer will tank DD punches all day and then slag for walking PIS sh** that he is!
Originally posted by h1a8
Destroyer was never shown or hinted to being more powerful depending on who's animating it. Extra abilities that was never shown prior doesn't mean more powerful. Certainly various writers had no intention of this. You guys are creating something writers had no intentions of. In other words, you are going against writers intentions.
Yes, yes, it has.
Odin animating the Destroyer would be more powerful than Thor animating it who in turn is more powerful than a random human animating.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Yes, yes, it has.Odin animating the Destroyer would be more powerful than Thor animating it who in turn is more powerful than a random human animating.
Basically, more powerful the person more powerful than armor will be, and the armor is very very powerful. Plus somebody like Odin, Thor, Loki etc can use their power plus the armor, and they cant be harmed at all.
Originally posted by h1a8
Destroyer was never shown or hinted to being more powerful depending on who's animating it. Extra abilities that was never shown prior doesn't mean more powerful. Certainly various writers had no intention of this. You guys are creating something writers had no intentions of. In other words, you are going against writers intentions.
You really should try reading comics before you post.
Originally posted by h1a8
Give clear proof of this. Something that clearly the writer intended to show.
Read Simonson's run of Thor. If not for the feats, at least then for the stories as it's quite possibly the best run of Thor ever.
Thor in the Destroyer Armor is clearly superior to either Thor by himself or the Destroyer Armor by itself. It's supported by feats and narration as well as the statements of the likes of Thor, Hela, and Loki.
Originally posted by -Pr-Context clues, narration, etc. in comics all characters have lows and highs. It's called Variance. But when it's intentional it's usually mentioned. For example, it was mentioned several times that Superman was getting more powerful.
How can you tell what the writer did or didn't intend to show?
Originally posted by Silent MasterWhen are you ever going to debate? All you do is troll members. You provide no evidence, no counter arguments, nothing. If this ain't trolling then I don't know what is. If someone is wrong then make their arse look even worst by showing proof. Come at me, make me look like a fool. I dare you. When you fail to show proof then you are making yourself look bad or worst a liar.
You really should try reading comics before you post.
Originally posted by h1a8
When are you ever going to debate? All you do is troll members. You provide no evidence, no counter arguments, nothing. If this ain't trolling then I don't know what is. If someone is wrong then make their arse look even worst by showing proof. Come at me, make me look like a fool. I dare you. When you fail to show proof then you are making yourself look bad or worst a liar.
I find it funny that 4 people are telling you that you're wrong about the Destroyer and yet you, Mr. I've read almost 50 Thor comics is right and you 4 that have read several hundred each are wrong.
Originally posted by Silent MasterAnother troll post I see. Keep it up.
I find it funny that 4 people are telling you that you're wrong about the Destroyer and yet you, Mr. I've read almost 50 Thor comics is right and you 4 that have read several hundred each are wrong.
Thor fans are telling me I'm wrong. Did you notice? And someone telling me I'm wrong doesn't prove I'm wrong. This is common sense.
At least they try to offer some type of evidence. I'm thinking you know nothing of comics as you can't provide any evidence or proof towards your beliefs. You are going by looks and not feats. So through appearance (not feats) Destroyer LOOKS to be many times more durable than Superman. If I didn't know any better I would say Thanos is a big pillow man. Doesn't he look like you can poke him with a pin and he bleeds?
Stop going by looks and focus on what they done in comics.
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
Read Simonson's run of Thor. If not for the feats, at least then for the stories as it's quite possibly the best run of Thor ever.Thor in the Destroyer Armor is clearly superior to either Thor by himself or the Destroyer Armor by itself. It's supported by feats and narration as well as the statements of the likes of Thor, Hela, and Loki.
Originally posted by DarkOdin
Destroyer power is determined by what us operation it,, A normal humna has power destroyer to be able to kill Thor, Odin empowering it with asgard minus Thor made the 2000ft destroyer, It has been shown that depending on th elevel of being operating the destoryer it power can rise, Also King Thors power in the destoryer would stack as we seen when odin powered the destoryer, Odin could summon Mjolnir,
Originally posted by JakeTheBank
This is mind boggling.
Only to the bias and not the objective.
There is no writer intention anywhere that the Destroyer's durability is depended on the user. This is the truth and you know it. I read through the Destroyer arc under Simonson. I didn't see anything alluding to what you are speculating.
Destroyer=Destroyer
doesn't matter who's animating it.