Well since the OGD vs Phil thing has apparently fallen through can the peeps arguing a "Super speedblitz before anyone here can react" please post the scans anyway? If Superman has feats of blitzing other super speedsters while they too are fighting him back at super speeds then that's some amazing shyt.
Originally posted by dmills
Well since the OGD vs Phil thing has apparently fallen through can the peeps arguing a "Super speedblitz before anyone here can react" please post the scans anyway? If Superman has feats of blitzing other super speedsters while they too are fighting him back at super speeds then that's some amazing shyt.
These missiles were going to blitz-sterlize entire DC multiverse.
Originally posted by ODGThe judges are there simply because we won't come to a consensus - and the agreed upon 3rd parties would do it for us.
I just really think that there's no point in judges. In case you haven't noticed, I've had little luck with battlezones (most being non-starters) and the only reason I ever tried those in the first place was to put an end to someone who I felt was completely trolling me. We haven't started trolling each other yet. We've had constructive discussions in the past (cordial or not). And, well... if you really want validation, you can ask three people to post their opinions on which one of us is right after the fact.
You agree to making this short, with a post count, and also with judges [backhandedly, as it was].
That's a battlezone in everything, other than you telling me that I will pick the judges, because you don't want to have anything to do with their decision.
How about we both agree with who they are?
Originally posted by Philosophía
The judges are there simply because we won't come to a consensus - and the agreed upon 3rd parties would do it for us.You agree to making this short, with a post count, and also with judges [backhandedly, as it was].
That's a battlezone in everything, other than you telling me that I will pick the judges, because you don't want to have anything to do with their decision.
How about we both agree with who they are?
I don't think it's going to happen bro. How's this for an idea, you post your stuff, ODG posts his and then you both place each other on ignore after the allotted three post limit so as to not make the exchange endless? Lol.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaWho says we need to come to a consensus? Are you really gong to pretend that this three post argument is going to be definitive? I was trying to open a line of discussion here and, so far, have been thwarted for pages.
The judges are there simply because we won't come to a consensus - and the agreed upon 3rd parties would do it for us.You agree to making this short, with a post count, and also with judges [backhandedly, as it was].
I agreed to the post count. I agreed you can go ahead and have some judges opine on who has the better argument. I don't understand what's backhanded about that. There's no ulterior purpose here. I just don't care.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaExactly. So what's the problem?
That's a battlezone in everything, other than you telling me that I will pick the judges, because you don't want to have anything to do with their decision.How about we both agree with who they are?
If you weren't going to talk about this unless someone explicitly agreed to a battlezone, you didn't really make that clear in your opening challenge to Newjak. I probably would not have bothered had you done so. But that's on me. What's on you, however, is phucking a simple invitation to talk about what you're asserting into e-oblivion after offering me a choice which you reneged on:
Originally posted by PhilosophíaI've spent more time on this tortuously vapid non-starter conversation than I would have on the actual issue at hand. I wasn't expecting that. And now, I'm almost absolutely sure that I don't care about what you would have had to say if this was any sort of preview.
Good.Battlezone or here?
Not anymore anyway. I trust you to believe me when I flatly say this, "Ok, whatever, maybe next time."
Originally posted by ODG
K, let's get Galan007, srankmissingnin and Nihilist and the only thing that'll be settled is which one of us has p1ssed them off more.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaBah, a few sour arguments doesn't mean I hate you guys. I still respect the both of ya, tbh.
[despite our differences and the fact that he hates me, I'd probably take Galan as a judge]
There's only one(maybe two) dude(s) 'round these parts that I legitimately cannot stand.
Originally posted by ODGNvm. I phucking hate you.
Galan007 can go phuck himself up his smelly butt with Mindset's chubb. uhuhahah
Seriously, go get raped, Galan007. sneer
