Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Shorty, it goes like this.... She CREATED the characters, she created the universe. The movies are DIRECTLY related to those characters, and that same person was also the no. 1 resource for the making of the movie. So her opinion very much matters.Are you claiming Albus doesn't exist in the movies?
Are you claiming Volde doesn't exist in the movies?We know they both exist and they are characters she created. So if she feels like one of HER characters are stronger than others, that is her opinion. Period. Doesn't matter if it's movies or books... that's her overriding position on the characters. Thus she feels like Albus is No. 1, now if you have proof she doesn't feel that way... provide proof
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiYou didn't prove it. Film versions are different. Feats matter. You said that in another thread and ignore feats in this very thread. Hypocrite. 💃
Since you were unable to provide any proof that the creator of the universe and characters were are discussing change her opinion on who's more powerful. You were unable to provide any support that she change her view. Thus Albus is indeed No. 1. I accept your defeat.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiWhen did you post any evidence ? She said the t is silent in Voldemort yet the movies clearly annunciate the t. Movies only. Reread the rules. Quit ignoring feats. In one thread you said that matters but in here you ignore it altogether. Be consistent, sport.
Nope, you were unable to provide evidence she changed her mind. I'll just go ahead and go with the creator of the universe and the very characters we are discussing. Her opinion is EXPONENTIALLY greater than yours. Thus, Albus is no. 1
Originally posted by quanchi112
I am very wise. I know the t in Voldemort is silent in the books not so in the films, kid.
That's not answering the question. You don't know if the books are different from the movies because you've never read them. You being wise is pretty much opinionated and isn't fact based. I've actaully read the books and have seen the movies and I can tell you they are in fact generally the same. That's why it says based in the novel by JK Rowling in the credits.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2I have heard enough about the differences. In the books he can't tell when the horcruxes are being destroyed but in the films he can feel it. Huge difference. The final confrontation is different. Based on doesn't mean exact translation, kid. Films are different, boy.
That's not answering the question. You don't know if the books are different from the movies because you've never read them. You being wise is pretty much opinionated and isn't fact based. I've actaully read the books and have seen the movies and I can tell you they are in fact generally the same. That's why it says based in the novel by JK Rowling in the credits.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I have heard enough about the differences. In the books he can't tell when the horcruxes are being destroyed but in the films he can feel it. Huge difference. The final confrontation is different. Based on doesn't mean exact translation, kid. Films are different, boy.
Heard. So you've heard other interpretations which are there own and again not necessarily true for an overall. For instance what I say is in fact my opinion, however I have read all the books and have seen the movies and can say in a general bases they are the same. That's a specific diffenrce. Not feeling in one and feeling it in one isn't a huge diffenrce. It wouldn't change anything in the films. So was the battle with Dumbeldore and Voldmeort. It's generally the same, same meaning same everything behind it except the attacks are diffenent however Dumbleodre does in both use a water bubble in both. It's the same thing just small differences. So yes they are GENERALLY the same. Scene for scene isn't the same which ain't really that important. JK Rowling gave it the official stamp of approval and did in fact go over the scripts with Steve Klovis to make sure it stayed in line with her vision. So until you read the books yourself don't try it. The books are the same as the movies in a general sense.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2That is a key difference between the film version and the book as is the pronunciation of Voldemort. It isn't exactly the same and her comments have to do with the books not the films which are different.
Heard. So you've heard other interpretations which are there own and again not necessarily true for an overall. For instance what I say is in fact my opinion, however I have read all the books and have seen the movies and can say in a general bases they are the same. That's a specific diffenrce. Not feeling in one and feeling it in one isn't a huge diffenrce. It wouldn't change anything in the films. So was the battle with Dumbeldore and Voldmeort. It's generally the same, same meaning same everything behind it except the attacks are diffenent however Dumbleodre does in both use a water bubble in both. It's the same thing just small differences. So yes they are GENERALLY the same. Scene for scene isn't the same which ain't really that important. JK Rowling gave it the official stamp of approval and did in fact go over the scripts with Steve Klovis to make sure it stayed in line with her vision. So until you read the books yourself don't try it. The books are the same as the movies in a general sense.
Originally posted by quanchi112
That is a key difference between the film version and the book as is the pronunciation of Voldemort. It isn't exactly the same and her comments have to do with the books not the films which are different.
Her comments deal with the Harry Potter universe. If she says someone is more powerful than another it's for the whole thing. It doesn't change.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.You can't even explain what the hell you're talking about.
As do you but unlike yours mine makes sense and is consistent with the portrayal of the characters and their powers.
I don't stress about losers I just laugh at them when they get in my way.
No
I can and did. You don't even know what "shifting the goalpost" means 😂
Baseless speculation. You are still adding feats
You clearly spend lots of time thinking about me. Get your own life please
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Films are different. She wasn't the only one contributing there. We see major differences. Post an interview with her making film related only responses. Go ahead, boy.
Her comments deal with the Harry Potter universe. If she says someone is more powerful than another it's for the whole thing. It doesn't change.
Originally posted by juggermanYes.
NoI can and did. You don't even know what "shifting the goalpost" means 😂
Baseless speculation. You are still adding feats
You clearly spend lots of time thinking about me. Get your own life please
I do I wanted to hear how you claimed I was. You didn't say anything. I ask you anything and you fumble all over yourself.
No, I'm assessing the scene with common sense based on established continuity consistent with the portrayal of the characters.
You're a loser. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes.I do I wanted to hear how you claimed I was. You didn't say anything. I ask you anything and you fumble all over yourself.
No, I'm assessing the scene with common sense based on established continuity consistent with the portrayal of the characters.
You're a loser. 😂
No
Concession accepted
You are saying things happened without any evidence besides "well it makes sense to me". Again not gonna fly
You're the one with me on your mind. Go make a friend or two