Originally posted by quanchi112
Post the interview where she states this.
If your emotionally scarred by Alan Rickmans passing, brace yourself. We all were.
http://www.someecards.com/entertainment/celebrities/jk-rowling-alan-rickman/
Here is the link. There is also a link inside this one that will give you more details if you wish.
This link also says explicitly that Alan Rickman corrected the directors occasionally saying he couldn't act that way cause he already knew how he was supposed to. Now remember by a certain point deathly allows was not made. It wasn't made until 2007.
The link where she changes a point in the movie.
Watch end credits to see she was a producer for the last two films.
http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Warner_Bros.
Here it gives details about the deal Rowling made with Warner Bros. In this deal she retained creative(complete) control, she decided that all actors and actresses had to be British or Irish, and French for the fourth film, it also says she worked closely with Steve Kloves who made the scrips.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_(film_series)#Scripts It's also backed by this.
https://youtu.be/SrJiAG8GmnQ this is a very long documentary about Rowlings adventure with Harry Potter. I encourage you to to watch it as it is fascinating. It's about an hour so you may want to find time where you can watch it.
It has interviews with Rolwing one around the 30:32 mark that proves some of the points here.
I believe this is everything.
https://youtu.be/X2adjz-KG9Y 16:50-20:10 here it explains her leverage, things she did with the films, the control she had and yea watch, and you'll get the picture.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Harry is some kid who grows as the series progresses. He also thought Snape was an ******* and boy was he wrong. For ****s sake type something at least resembling evidence.
Well I mean when you have someone who bullies you for the entire series yeah you see him as a villain. Everyone on planet earth who read the books or watched the films, would have thought he was a villain up until the last two movies.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, it shows both are highly skilled not just Tom. You act like he just jerks his cock which makes no sense considering the fear in the wizarding world over Voldemort. So taking extra care is releasing him and screwing it up. 🙄Him using his arm to create force.
Voldemort was at Albus' mercy until Harry inadvertently saved him. Facts
Not enough force to break out on his own
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Where is the interview in which she states Albus is greater than Voldemort ?
If your emotionally scarred by Alan Rickmans passing, brace yourself. We all were.http://www.someecards.com/entertainment/celebrities/jk-rowling-alan-rickman/
Here is the link. There is also a link inside this one that will give you more details if you wish.
This link also says explicitly that Alan Rickman corrected the directors occasionally saying he couldn't act that way cause he already knew how he was supposed to. Now remember by a certain point deathly allows was not made. It wasn't made until 2007.
The link where she changes a point in the movie.
Watch end credits to see she was a producer for the last two films.
http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Warner_Bros.
Here it gives details about the deal Rowling made with Warner Bros. In this deal she retained creative(complete) control, she decided that all actors and actresses had to be British or Irish, and French for the fourth film, it also says she worked closely with Steve Kloves who made the scrips.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_(film_series)#Scripts It's also backed by this.
https://youtu.be/SrJiAG8GmnQ this is a very long documentary about Rowlings adventure with Harry Potter. I encourage you to to watch it as it is fascinating. It's about an hour so you may want to find time where you can watch it.
It has interviews with Rolwing one around the 30:32 mark that proves some of the points here.I believe this is everything.
https://youtu.be/X2adjz-KG9Y 16:50-20:10 here it explains her leverage, things she did with the films, the control she had and yea watch, and you'll get the picture.
Control yourself as you went off on a side tangent. I never said she didn't help with the films but she isn't the director who changed key scenes. It wasn't the same exact thing as the books. Facts.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2I am not everyone. You along with the dim witted sheep such as insane Titan who reads goosebumps books with utter glee and excitement might but I'm the best. He was wrong. Harry was just a character in the film. So please think before you post.
Well I mean when you have someone who bullies you for the entire series yeah you see him as a villain. Everyone on planet earth who read the books or watched the films, would have thought he was a villain up until the last two movies.
Originally posted by juggermanProve this.
Voldemort was at Albus' mercy until Harry inadvertently saved him. FactsNot enough force to break out on his own
You ignore their powers, common sense, and their consistent portrayal throughout the films.
Based on ?
He casually moved a giant off the bridge but you're saying this water bubble is greater than that ?
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
Prove this.You ignore their powers, common sense, and their consistent portrayal throughout the films.
Based on ?
He casually moved a giant off the bridge but you're saying this water bubble is greater than that ?
😂
Screen feats shows this
I've ignored nothing. No one thing shows Tom escaping
The film
Cuz the water was in business for itself right?
Originally posted by quanchi112
Where is the interview in which she states Albus is greater than Voldemort ?Control yourself as you went off on a side tangent. I never said she didn't help with the films but she isn't the director who changed key scenes. It wasn't the same exact thing as the books. Facts.
Actually you asked KT for the Dumbledore greater than Voldemort speech. You asked me for the interview where she stated the points I made.
Learn to read. She actually did change scenes. How do you think the Mcgonagall vs Snape came to be?
http://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/video-j-k-rowling-admits-deathly-hallows-draft-had-snape-vs-harry-not-mcgonagall-86207/ here's the link again.
It doesn't have to be detail for detail, word for word the same. The fact is nothing like character powers, or personalities are changed, nothing like that is changed. Now how things go down like the deul here between Dumbledore and Voldemort, it has differences but it's realisticly the same. Same characters, most of the same moves, possession, overall the same. Facts.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Her input was taken in.
Actually you asked KT for the Dumbledore greater than Voldemort speech. You asked me for the interview where she stated the points I made.Learn to read. She actually did change scenes. How do you think the Mcgonagall vs Snape came to be?
http://www.snitchseeker.com/harry-potter-news/video-j-k-rowling-admits-deathly-hallows-draft-had-snape-vs-harry-not-mcgonagall-86207/ here's the link again.
It doesn't have to be detail for detail, word for word the same. The fact is nothing like character powers, or personalities are changed, nothing like that is changed. Now how things go down like the deul here between Dumbledore and Voldemort, it has differences but it's realisticly the same. Same characters, most of the same moves, possession, overall the same. Facts.
Nothing you've said backs your claims.
Details matter which is the whole point you fail to grasp.
😂
Originally posted by juggermana What screen feats ?
Screen feats shows thisI've ignored nothing. No one thing shows Tom escaping
The film
Cuz the water was in business for itself right?
I broke the scene down and you ignore logic and the consistent portrayal of the characters.
What in the film ? Try to be specific and show you can articulate your points for s change.
Force held the water together so why can't force break the bubble ? Did you see the size of the giant ?
Originally posted by quanchi112
a What screen feats ?I broke the scene down and you ignore logic and the consistent portrayal of the characters.
What in the film ? Try to be specific and show you can articulate your points for s change.
Force held the water together so why can't force break the bubble ? Did you see the size of the giant ?
Tom being at his mercy. It was displayed very effectively on screen
You broke down your ow biased interpretation. Won't fly here
The fight in the film
The force holding Voldemort in was greater than he could muster himself to escape
Originally posted by juggermanHe broke free of the bubble with no debilitating effects. He poured it on afterwards.
Tom being at his mercy. It was displayed very effectively on screenYou broke down your ow biased interpretation. Won't fly here
The fight in the film
The force holding Voldemort in was greater than he could muster himself to escape
It makes sense while yours doesn't.
You don't grasp the fight in the film.
Prove it.
Originally posted by quanchi112
He broke free of the bubble with no debilitating effects. He poured it on afterwards.It makes sense while yours doesn't.
You don't grasp the fight in the film.
Prove it.
Thanks to Harry
Yours only makes sense to you
You don't grasp any of it
Proven by that fact Vold couldn't escape on his own. Checkmate
Originally posted by quanchi112
Her input was taken in.Nothing you've said backs your claims.
Details matter which is the whole point you fail to grasp.
😂
She changed it.
Well until you can prove differently it does. I could take everything I sent you to an impartial judge and they would say it backs everything i say.
Actually it's more of a general thing which is what Rowling wanted. The directors and producers wanted to put everything in the books into the movies but they couldn't due to budget, and cinematic style of writing.
To get back on topic Producer David Heyman actaully implies that Dumbleodre is greater than Voldemort. https://youtu.be/178WTs3ogCY 25:04-25:09
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2collaboration.
She changed it.Well until you can prove differently it does. I could take everything I sent you to an impartial judge and they would say it backs everything i say.
Actually it's more of a general thing which is what Rowling wanted. The directors and producers wanted to put everything in the books into the movies but they couldn't due to budget, and cinematic style of writing.
To get back on topic Producer David Heyman actaully implies that Dumbleodre is greater than Voldemort. https://youtu.be/178WTs3ogCY 25:04-25:09
No, they didn't. You're lying.