Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nope.

No, his attention is on the duel and the surroundings. If it was t he would never see the water since you believe using his powers on anything outside of Tom means his attention is split. 😂

You didn't watch the scene. Prove it.

What things did I invent ?

You will never do one. You're a joke.

Yup

His attention was split. You fight differently when you are worried about others than you do when you are cutting loose. That's basic stuff man

So you disagree?

It's been explained to you. You are just ignoring facts

You run from this joke 😂

Originally posted by Bentley
I told you what my claim was, you can ignore it, misrepresent it, but don't go around calling it unproved when it's obvious to anyone who has seen the film that I'm on the right.

Voldemort. Did. Not. Win.

Dude, if you wanted me to look for proof about the Grinde duel you could have told me that from the beginning! It's a fair request after all.

I'll see what I can cook for you sometime later in the week 👆

Films only. You didn't even know Grinde shows up in the films. Ignorance why name is Bentley.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Voldemort dictated the fight and Albus held the elder wand which means he had the advantage. I successfully rebutted you troll.

The only advantage that matters to my point is if he conclusively won.

Which never happened 👆

Originally posted by Bentley
The only advantage that matters to my point is if he conclusively won.

Which never happened 👆

Just get lost. You aren't a debater and have no idea what you're even talking about.

Originally posted by juggerman
Yup

His attention was split. You fight differently when you are worried about others than you do when you are cutting loose. That's basic stuff man

So you disagree?

It's been explained to you. You are just ignoring facts

You run from this joke 😂

No, his attention is great enough to discern the environment around him. You believe it isn't.

Prove it.

What facts am I ignoring ?

I have already debated this and I don't think you're a good debater. You're a waste of a battlezone. Just do one first, kid.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah.

No, his attention is great enough to discern the environment around him. You believe it isn't.

Prove it.

What facts am I ignoring ?

I have already debated this and I don't think you're a good debater. You're a waste of a battlezone. Just do one first, kid.

Yup

Again you fight differently when you are concerned about bystanders than when you are not. First grade stuff here

Why?

The fact that there is not evidence that he used magic and even if he did, that he was going to escape without Harry's distraction

And you've lost here and several other places. You fear me.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Albus never won despite possessing the best wand in the entire universe. This shows Voldemort's superiority on top of his superior feats and the special features cementing he is the greatest.

Just get lost. You aren't a debater and have no idea what you're even talking about.

Dear, I'll hand you my debater card if you answer me the next question with a "yes" or a "no" without your usual dodging or elaborating with unwanted rants:

Did Voldemort defeat Dumbledore in single combat when they met in the Ministry of Magic?

Originally posted by juggerman
Yup

Again you fight differently when you are concerned about bystanders than when you are not. First grade stuff here

Why?

The fact that there is not evidence that he used magic and even if he did, that he was going to escape without Harry's distraction

And you've lost here and several other places. You fear me.

Harry wasn't getting involved and he was a part of the environment. You believe a moving boy throes his game off. That's cute.

Proving is always a part of making a claim.

You didn't prove he escaped due to Harry distracting him. You just kept claiming it.

Dude, you're just another wheel in my cog.

Originally posted by Bentley
Dear, I'll hand you my debater card if you answer me the next question with a "yes" or a "no" without your usual dodging or elaborating with unwanted rants:

Did Voldemort defeat Dumbledore in single combat when they met in the Ministry of Magic?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah.

Harry wasn't getting involved and he was a part of the environment. You believe a moving boy throes his game off. That's cute.

Proving is always a part of making a claim.

You didn't prove he escaped due to Harry distracting him. You just kept claiming it.

Dude, you're just another wheel in my cog.

Yep

It makes perfect sense when considering his past. But I had to spoon feed you that before so I doubt you remember it now

Like you would know

That was the chain of events. You are trying to add additional links to that chain to suit you.

You might want to try that again 😂

Originally posted by juggerman
Yep

It makes perfect sense when considering his past. But I had to spoon feed you that before so I doubt you remember it now

Like you would know

That was the chain of events. You are trying to add additional links to that chain to suit you.

You might want to try that again 😂

So you believe Albus only lost concentration because he's incompetent in battle because Harry moved. That might make perfect sense to you.

I always back my claims.

What chains ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
Albus held the advantage due to the wand. The wand is powerful but it just enhances the power it doesn't make one incredibly skilled. Albus defeated someone with the elder wand because his skill was greater than the guy who wielded it. Grind held the advantage but against Voldemort we see despite the wand he didn't best Voldemort because his skill was greater than Grind's who sidled the wand. Advantage: Voldemort.

So Albus wins? Cool. The Creator agrees

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
So Albus wins? Cool. The Creator agrees

Originally posted by quanchi112
No.

So you believe Albus only lost concentration because he's incompetent in battle because Harry moved. That might make perfect sense to you.

I always back my claims.

What chains ?

Yup

I believe he is overly cautious due to what happened in his past.

You back nothing

The cogs

Originally posted by juggerman
Yup

I believe he is overly cautious due to what happened in his past.

You back nothing

The cogs

So you believe he's an idiot and afraid. Hahahaha.

Everything.

You are just a cog.

Albus easily wins per the creator

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Albus easily wins per the creator

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Albus easily wins per the creator

Harry saying Dumbledore is the greatest wizard in the world should suffice here. As well as hermione' statement in sorcerer Stone saying that as long Dumbleodre is around he is safe and all that. I think those quotes should be what your looking for since Harry is the main character and in sure Rowling wouldn't have Harry saying things like that that weren't true. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Post the interview. Otherwise you concede.

Harry saying Dumbledore is the greatest wizard in the world should suffice here. As well as hermione' statement in sorcerer Stone saying that as long Dumbleodre is around he is safe and all that. I think those quotes should be what your looking for since Harry is the main character and in sure Rowling wouldn't have Harry saying things like that that weren't true. lol

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah.

So you believe he's an idiot and afraid. Hahahaha.

Everything.

You are just a cog.

Yup

Strawman

Nothin

Earlier you said I was a wheel. Make up your mind 😂