Originally posted by juggermanNo, you aren't.
I am rightAll of them. Like the fact there is nothing supporting the idea of Tommy escaping on his own. Well other than your fanboism
Says the guy that's scared shitless of Battle Zoning a guy who has never done one. Dude you ran away from several of my challenges 😂
You didn't even deny your strawman tactic. Concession accepted 👆
You're obsessed with me 😆
When you run me off for 7 months like I did to you then you can talk 💃
Why would they show Voldemort waving his arm through the water if it meant nothing ?
Says the guy who has never done one.
You make shit up.
Nah, you're a coward.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
http://www.amazon.com/Harry-Unofficial-Guide-Payoffs-Possibilities/dp/1430300876This was written by Janet Scott Batcher, the person who said Voldemort is and I quote "Most powerful wizard of the age." This is on the special features Quan has referred to. I've decided to put this to rest once and for all with concrete evidence.
Janet Scott Batcher is the author of "What will Harry Do?" After looking into this the full title is What Will Harry Do?: The Unofficial Guide to Payoffs and Possibilities in Book 7. Now that right there eliminates any and all credit she may have on movie 5 since her area is book 7 and thus she may make speculations on movies 7 and 8. What also eliminates her as a credible source is the fact that the book she wrote IN THE TITLE says UNOFFICAL, which in other words means not canon and doesn't count here. It's merely speculations. So thus anything she said is in fact opinion. She also gets her argument from the book and that one statement is said directly from Dumledore on page 11 of the Sorcerrers stone paragraph 4 of that page. I will post the link aswell.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It is still on the DVD features and this isn't the only piece of evidence. Cry more.
It is on DVD features but now after that I've showed you why it's all just her opinion and can't be used as evidence.
Now that that is defeated due to show your other pieces of evidence that is actaully evidence, and not your own opinion.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2I never said it wasn't her opinion but it is on there so it's weighted due to being on there.
It is on DVD features but now after that I've showed you why it's all just her opinion and can't be used as evidence.Now that that is defeated due to show your other pieces of evidence that is actaully evidence, and not your own opinion.
That isn't defeated at all. 😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it wasn't her opinion but it is on there so it's weighted due to being on there.That isn't defeated at all. 😂
So if I were on there and I said Dumbleodre was better it would hold weight just cause I was there? No it wouldn't. It doesn't matter. She is one of the many factions and she was allowed to be there, however it is just her opinion and the evidence she uses is book based which is illegal here.
Yea it is, so what other "evidence" you got.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2It's in the film special features and she worked on the film. That matters. Feats, their battle, him being the antagonist to the entire Harry Potter universe you yourself posted that link.
So if I were on there and I said Dumbleodre was better it would hold weight just cause I was there? No it wouldn't. It doesn't matter. She is one of the many factions and she was allowed to be there, however it is just her opinion and the evidence she uses is book based which is illegal here.Yea it is, so what other "evidence" you got.
Originally posted by quanchi112
It's in the film special features and she worked on the film. That matters. Feats, their battle, him being the antagonist to the entire Harry Potter universe you yourself posted that link.
Prove she worked on the films. She was an author of "What will Harry Do?" She had no part in asking the movie.
Feats hes which Dumbledore arguably has better of.
Their deul. Which Dumbleore arguably came out of appearing superior since Voldemort did flee the battle before the ministry arrived.
Dumbleodre. The grand Mage. The protector. Leader of the order of the Phoenix.
Known as the greatest wizard/sorcerrer of the age and so much more.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2She was listed by the film as having her opinion included.
Prove she worked on the films. She was an author of "What will Harry Do?" She had no part in asking the movie.Feats hes which Dumbledore arguably has better of.
Their deul. Which Dumbleore arguably came out of appearing superior since Voldemort did flee the battle before the ministry arrived.
Dumbleodre. The grand Mage. The protector. Leader of the order of the Phoenix.
Known as the greatest wizard/sorcerrer of the age and so much more.
What feats ?
Voldemort imposed his will while Albus was just frantically watching on in horror.
Voldemort was the antagonist to the entire Harry Potter universe as per your clip.
😂
Originally posted by quanchi112
She was listed by the film as having her opinion included.What feats ?
Voldemort imposed his will while Albus was just frantically watching on in horror.
Voldemort was the antagonist to the entire Harry Potter universe as per your clip.
😂
Her opinion which isn't worth a grain of salt due to her being a conspiracy theorist and her opinion was booked based which illegal here, and the evidence she basis it off of can be interpreted many different ways.
Firestorm while severely weakene, water kinetic spell which was a spot on hit, DEFEATING GELLERT GRINDLEWALD, blocking Voldemorts dark energy blast, destroying Voldemort Fiendfyre, turning all the glass to sand, having Voldemort run away from him to posses Harry before the order showed up, having been the only wizard Voldemort ever feared, and I could go on to name other accomplishments but I think you get the point.
After fleeing his duel with Dumbledore.
What does him being the antagonist have anything to do with this battle?
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2She is included in the DVD special features so it exists despite your fear.
Her opinion which isn't worth a grain of salt due to her being a conspiracy theorist and her opinion was booked based which illegal here, and the evidence she basis it off of can be interpreted many different ways.Firestorm while severely weakene, water kinetic spell which was a spot on hit, DEFEATING GELLERT GRINDLEWALD, blocking Voldemorts dark energy blast, destroying Voldemort Fiendfyre, turning all the glass to sand, having Voldemort run away from him to posses Harry before the order showed up, having been the only wizard Voldemort ever feared, and I could go on to name other accomplishments but I think you get the point.
After fleeing his duel with Dumbledore.
What does him being the antagonist have anything to do with this battle?
Those aren't great feats those are appropriate spells for the circumstances but the pure power feats belong to Voldemort. Destroying the shield himself is the best feat in the entire series.
The Aurors showed up while Albus stood helplessly by while Voldemort mocked Harry.
Originally posted by quanchi112
She is included in the DVD special features so it exists despite your fear.Those aren't great feats those are appropriate spells for the circumstances but the pure power feats belong to Voldemort. Destroying the shield himself is the best feat in the entire series.
The Aurors showed up while Albus stood helplessly by while Voldemort mocked Harry.
Ok your getting better. It does exist but can't be used as evidence since it's just her opinion, and now that we know what her position is and that she had no part in making or developing the film, and that her evidence is based off of the books which is illegal,.
They actaully are great feats. They showed his defense against Voldemort, and more. Those show pure power Quan. Stop trying to downgrade just cause it shows Dumbledore is better. Dumbledore can meet Voldemort head to head, and come out slightly superior. Voldmeort fled so that right there shows Dumbledore's superiority. Him destroying the sheild being the greatest feat is two things.
1. Opinionated.
2. Was him with elder wand. He has his own wand. While I'm not saying no he can't do it without elder wand, but it was with the elder wand. Dumbledore on the other hand was severely weakened, and dieing and still pulled off that firestorm, which went underwater and was non verbally done.
https://youtu.be/URbvT_pkAjI Voldemort fled before aurors showed up.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2The DVD used her opinion therefore giving her opinion weight.
Ok your getting better. It does exist but can't be used as evidence since it's just her opinion, and now that we know what her position is and that she had no part in making or developing the film, and that her evidence is based off of the books which is illegal,.They actaully are great feats. They showed his defense against Voldemort, and more. Those show pure power Quan. Stop trying to downgrade just cause it shows Dumbledore is better. Dumbledore can meet Voldemort head to head, and come out slightly superior. Voldmeort fled so that right there shows Dumbledore's superiority. Him destroying the sheild being the greatest feat is two things.
1. Opinionated.
2. Was him with elder wand. He has his own wand. While I'm not saying no he can't do it without elder wand, but it was with the elder wand. Dumbledore on the other hand was severely weakened, and dieing and still pulled off that firestorm, which went underwater and was non verbally done.
https://youtu.be/URbvT_pkAjI Voldemort fled before aurors showed up.
No, that is the right spell at the right time with skill and some power. Voldemort's feat was just superior and when you factor in the wand resisted him it's off the charts.
Quit ignoring the context. The elder wand also didn't resisted Albus who used a fire spell. Big whoop.