Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Started by quanchi112183 pages

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
It doesn't matter if it was in the film or not. What matters is the substance. She had no hand in making the books or the movies, no hand in any canon source for Harry Potter, no hand in aiming anything legal here. All of what she said is simply her opinion, it's not weighted to the point it can be sued in thei debate, and doesn't give a decisive win to either one even in a debate where everything is accepted.

Yes yours is. Your concession has been accepted since the first page we debated this.

Her opinion was included as in weighted evidence. The films chose to attach her opinions to their special features not your shitty opinion.

You can't rebut any of my points ie. You lose.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Her opinion was included as in weighted evidence. The films chose to attach her opinions to their special features not your shitty opinion.

You can't rebut any of my points ie. You lose.

Again until you can prove that her opinion actaully has substance that makes it weighted her opinion is just an opinion.

I've rebutted every last point you've made.

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Again until you can prove that her opinion actaully has substance that makes it weighted her opinion is just an opinion.

I've rebutted every last point you've made.

I proved they included it in there. Done.

No, you haven't but it's cute your tiny brain thinks so.

Originally posted by quanchi112
This is why you're a child unable to make a point and stuck in a troll loop.

I win.

Concession accepted

You lose

Originally posted by juggerman
Concession accepted

You lose

When did I concede ?

I won.

Originally posted by quanchi112
When did I concede ?

I won.

You mean after your hiatus? You conceded Tommy fled

You lost as per the norm

Originally posted by juggerman
You mean after your hiatus? You conceded Tommy fled

You lost as per the norm

I have other matters to attend to. You don't. Voldemort left after the ministry showed up. We've been over this, troll.

You claimed he fled earlier which ignores the definition.

You are delusional as per the norm.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I proved they included it in there. Done.

No, you haven't but it's cute your tiny brain thinks so.

Where's the substance. It doesn't matter it's there, what matters is the substance. Until you can show me the substance, her opinion isn't proving or weighted on any scale what so ever.

Actaully yes I have, your just biased and delusional so you think no one ever counters your points. It's sad Quan. Why do you do this?

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
Where's the substance. It doesn't matter it's there, what matters is the substance. Until you can show me the substance, her opinion isn't proving or weighted on any scale what so ever.

Actaully yes I have, your just biased and delusional so you think no one ever counters your points. It's sad Quan. Why do you do this?

The people who released the film believed her opinion was credible enough to release it on the special features.

Irony. My points weren't countered. You're an idiot.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I have other matters to attend to. You don't. Voldemort left after the ministry showed up. We've been over this, troll.

You claimed he fled earlier which ignores the definition.

You are delusional as per the norm.

This place is your life. You can't understand the meaning of the word so you did flips. Tom fled. You agreed. Concession accepted

He did. You flipped. Concession accepted

You lose again

Originally posted by juggerman
This place is your life. You can't understand the meaning of the word so you did flips. Tom fled. You agreed. Concession accepted

He did. You flipped. Concession accepted

You lose again

No, just another area I dominate. He only left danger when I said he did. You didn't make any sense while,my stance has stayed the same.

You've never won anything in your normal and pathetic life.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, just another area I dominate. He only left danger when I said he did. You didn't make any sense while,my stance has stayed the same.

You've never won anything in your normal and pathetic life.

This is your entire life. So sad. He fled Albus and you agreed. Concession accepted

Irony

Originally posted by juggerman
This is your entire life. So sad. He fled Albus and you agreed. Concession accepted

Irony

Nah, this is just another area you don't measure up. No, he fled from all those wizards who were not his allies. I've explained this to you troll.

Another word you don't know the meaning of.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Nah, this is just another area you don't measure up. No, he fled from all those wizards who were not his allies. I've explained this to you troll.

Another word you don't know the meaning of.

You explained nothing but your fanboism. You agreed he fled from Albus. Concession accepted

Irony

Originally posted by juggerman
You explained nothing but your fanboism. You agreed he fled from Albus. Concession accepted

Irony

No, he didn't. Quit trolling and ignoring the detailed explanation I have given repeatedly.

Right back at cha.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he didn't. Quit trolling and ignoring the detailed explanation I have given repeatedly.

Right back at cha.

I didn't ignore your shitty explanation. I destroyed it and pointed out your bias. Then you just repeated yourself and ignored logic as per the norm 😂

Concession accepted

Originally posted by juggerman
I didn't ignore your shitty explanation. I destroyed it and pointed out your bias. Then you just repeated yourself and ignored logic as per the norm 😂

Concession accepted

As per the definition he only left after the backup arrived. Alabus was steps away and just watched. Watch the scene you idiot. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
As per the definition he only left after the backup arrived. Alabus was steps away and just watched. Watch the scene you idiot. 😂

As per your bias "I need Tom to be a winner despite all evidence to the contrary" definition sure. But the actual definition? Wrong again

Originally posted by juggerman
As per your bias "I need Tom to be a winner despite all evidence to the contrary" definition sure. But the actual definition? Wrong again
I went along with the definition you didn't since he only left harm at the end. You are the biased one. Sad.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I went along with the definition you didn't since he only left harm at the end. You are the biased one. Sad.

You created you're own edit to the actual definition. It was sad