Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Her opinion was included as in weighted evidence. The films chose to attach her opinions to their special features not your shitty opinion.
It doesn't matter if it was in the film or not. What matters is the substance. She had no hand in making the books or the movies, no hand in any canon source for Harry Potter, no hand in aiming anything legal here. All of what she said is simply her opinion, it's not weighted to the point it can be sued in thei debate, and doesn't give a decisive win to either one even in a debate where everything is accepted.Yes yours is. Your concession has been accepted since the first page we debated this.
You can't rebut any of my points ie. You lose.