Voldemort vs. Albus Dumbledore

Originally posted by quanchi112
So now you changed your stance that he was a coward to he was stupid even though neither make sense.

Context. Tom was his superior but he relied on help to survive. Tom is on another level and Harry never engaged him in a fair fight.

Tom's dark magic already sealed the deal. Why kill him if he didn't have to ? He's the boss, kid. Presidents don't assassinate enemies. Albus went down as did the ministry. Albus died. Weak.

I changed no stance. It doesn't take bravery for a grown man to take on a child. He still fled like a coward from a fair fight (adult vs adult). Looks like he only can man up against children

So IOW Tom didn't sack the Ministry or kill Albus like you claimed. Concession accepted

Albus had to die for Tom to rise. Tom couldn't rise with Albus around. Shows you who's top dawg when Tommy had to slither in the shadows while Albus was standing unopposed in the light

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you ignored everything I said and trolled. You have nothing I have feats, weighted opinions, etc.

It was on the DVD features thus it does have weight. Yours wasn't. Period.

I didn't ignore it, I just said that the special features you have isn't factual and you have nothing flat out saying Voldemort I'd better that is factaul. We can debate feats though. I have feats as well, and you have no weighed opinion, you just have an opinion.

That doesn't matter. What matters is the substance, and yours has no substance period.

Originally posted by juggerman
I changed no stance. It doesn't take bravery for a grown man to take on a child. He still fled like a coward from a fair fight (adult vs adult). Looks like he only can man up against children

So IOW Tom didn't sack the Ministry or kill Albus like you claimed. Concession accepted

Albus had to die for Tom to rise. Tom couldn't rise with Albus around. Shows you who's top dawg when Tommy had to slither in the shadows while Albus was standing unopposed in the light

Albus was already cursed to die but he had him killed. It was done. He also sacked the ministry his forces. He's the leader, dipshit. You're such a troll.

Albus was taken out easily he was nothing. Shame. Ministry also fell but it took more time than old Albus. Tom prevailed while Albus died. 😂

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
I didn't ignore it, I just said that the special features you have isn't factual and you have nothing flat out saying Voldemort I'd better that is factaul. We can debate feats though. I have feats as well, and you have no weighed opinion, you just have an opinion.

That doesn't matter. What matters is the substance, and yours has no substance period.

I have evidence and common sense you don't.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It didn't matter what age Harry was he was going to kill him no matter what. Harry fled like a coward multiple times and let others die for him. Voldemort even stated this in the film.

Albus was already cursed to die but he had him killed. It was done. He also sacked the ministry his forces. He's the leader, dipshit. You're such a troll.

Albus was taken out easily he was nothing. Shame. Ministry also fell but it took more time than old Albus. Tom prevailed while Albus died. 😂

Harry fled = cowardice but Tom fled = smart? Bias 101

Concession accepted

Tom fled Albus. Tom is a weak coward

Originally posted by juggerman
Harry fled = cowardice but Tom fled = smart? Bias 101

Concession accepted

Tom fled Albus. Tom is a weak coward

Incorrect. Context but trolls like you are a joke.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It is a weighted opinion unlike yours. You don't have any feats that rival the shield feat. You're an idiot.

I have evidence and common sense you don't.

It's an opinion just like mine. Until you can show me she had a leading roll or even an actors role in the movies, or an illustrators roll in writing the canon novels, her opinion is just a regular opinion. Again Firestorm.

I have evidence, you have the opposite of common sense.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Harry fled one on one fights. Voldemort didn't. You're an idiot.

Incorrect. Context but trolls like you are a joke.

Tom fled his 1 on 1 fight with Albus

I'm correct. Irony

**** this thread

Originally posted by EmperorSidious2
It's an opinion just like mine. Until you can show me she had a leading roll or even an actors role in the movies, or an illustrators roll in writing the canon novels, her opinion is just a regular opinion. Again Firestorm.

I have evidence, you have the opposite of common sense.

Nothing about the firestorm was impressive power wise.

You're an idiot.

Originally posted by juggerman
Tom fled his 1 on 1 fight with Albus

I'm correct. Irony

Nah.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He didn't leave from all danger until the ministry showed up. Quit ignoring what the word means,

Nah.

So you admit he fled from danger, just not all of it? Good we're making progress. Concession accepted

Yup

Originally posted by juggerman
So you admit he fled from danger, just not all of it? Good we're making progress. Concession accepted

Yup

Nah.

Originally posted by quanchi112
He left when his opposition grew in numbers to where it would be foolish to stay. Smart move and it wasn't one on one. You're an idiot.

Nah.

You said he didn't flee all the danger so you agree he fled at least some of it. Concession accepted

Yup

Originally posted by juggerman
You said he didn't flee all the danger so you agree he fled at least some of it. Concession accepted

Yup

Nah.

This thread is worse then Robtard.

Originally posted by Time-Immemorial
This thread is worse then Robtard.

Can you ask Imp to close this thread? Its almost as bad as Rob.

I do not want this thread to ever end. Well one exception. Upon my death close this thread. Until then I will reign fire down upon the enemies of Lord Voldemort.

Originally posted by quanchi112
No, he left at the end of the scene. He couldn't possess Harry if he left you ninny.

Nah.

Concession already accepted

Yah