Originally posted by quanchi112
It was included in the films special features yours wasn't.Nothing about the firestorm was impressive power wise.
You're an idiot.
That doesn't mean anything. It's all about substance. You take a random homeless person and put them in ear place, and they have never had any involvement in among the movies or the books, their opinion is still just their opinion, it's not weighted, it doesn't win debates, it doesn't do anything.
I have about 5-7 people who disagree with you. I actually asked someone and they said it wasn't even a contest that Firsstorm blows Voldemorts shield charm out of the water. This person says it was a beast of a spell.
Yes you are Quan. Glad we both agree.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2This was not a random homeless person. They wouldn't include some assholes opinion here. That's the point,
That doesn't mean anything. It's all about substance. You take a random homeless person and put them in ear place, and they have never had any involvement in among the movies or the books, their opinion is still just their opinion, it's not weighted, it doesn't win debates, it doesn't do anything.I have about 5-7 people who disagree with you. I actually asked someone and they said it wasn't even a contest that Firsstorm blows Voldemorts shield charm out of the water. This person says it was a beast of a spell.
Yes you are Quan. Glad we both agree.
Popularity does not either. My points have been made and I have a weighted opinion supporting my claims unlike yours.
Prove it.
You're an idiot.
Originally posted by quanchi112
This was not a random homeless person. They wouldn't include some assholes opinion here. That's the point,Popularity does not either. My points have been made and I have a weighted opinion supporting my claims unlike yours.
Prove it.
You're an idiot.
No the point is anyone could have gone and put forth their opinion, becuase she average person had no hand in creating the book series or the movies. All she has done so been a conspiracy theorist, and then I've already proved that her evidence is booked based being a paraphrased quote from the Sorcerrs Stone, that makes it illegal here, which means her opinion has no evidence, which means it has no substance, and therefore has no weight but of someone ho has read the books and watched the movies, just like I have and thus her opinion is not weighted.
It helps in this case in which it's an option question. It shows what the majority of people feel versus someone like yourself who is biased and stupid. Your points have no evidence and in fact have evidence to the contrary of everything you say and when someone does show you evidence you just say it's not evidence cause you know you lost. I've already answered the weighted quote.
Prove FIRESTROM is better? Again which power is better is all opinion. Then when you look at the context of the Hogwarts shield, it was already broken, hit by hundreds of other wizards. This is really a good feat for the four wizards who made the shield, since it was able to hold off such power from those extremely powerful witches and wizards. While on the other hand, you had Dumbledore who was severely weakened and about to die, who made a storm of fire that was not only powerful but precise enough to find the inferi that got Harry and remove it, and the storm filled up the whole cave, and Dumbleodre was able to split it while weakene without a wand, or hand gestures. So it's all opinion but the common consensus and based off the context to me shows that Firestorm is a superior spell, but it's all my opinion.
Quan, it's no need to insult yourself.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Not anyone gets put onto the DVD features. That's the point.
No the point is anyone could have gone and put forth their opinion, becuase she average person had no hand in creating the book series or the movies. All she has done so been a conspiracy theorist, and then I've already proved that her evidence is booked based being a paraphrased quote from the Sorcerrs Stone, that makes it illegal here, which means her opinion has no evidence, which means it has no substance, and therefore has no weight but of someone ho has read the books and watched the movies, just like I have and thus her opinion is not weighted.It helps in this case in which it's an option question. It shows what the majority of people feel versus someone like yourself who is biased and stupid. Your points have no evidence and in fact have evidence to the contrary of everything you say and when someone does show you evidence you just say it's not evidence cause you know you lost. I've already answered the weighted quote.
Prove FIRESTROM is better? Again which power is better is all opinion. Then when you look at the context of the Hogwarts shield, it was already broken, hit by hundreds of other wizards. This is really a good feat for the four wizards who made the shield, since it was able to hold off such power from those extremely powerful witches and wizards. While on the other hand, you had Dumbledore who was severely weakened and about to die, who made a storm of fire that was not only powerful but precise enough to find the inferi that got Harry and remove it, and the storm filled up the whole cave, and Dumbleodre was able to split it while weakene without a wand, or hand gestures. So it's all opinion but the common consensus and based off the context to me shows that Firestorm is a superior spell, but it's all my opinion.
Quan, it's no need to insult yourself.
So you can't back your claims and based off what the shield feat did its leaps and bounds superior to the firestorm against some weak inferi. Precision isn't power. Stay on point you can't seem to even get the point.
You're an idiot. Voldemort, hands down.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Not anyone gets put onto the DVD features. That's the point.So you can't back your claims and based off what the shield feat did its leaps and bounds superior to the firestorm against some weak inferi. Precision isn't power. Stay on point you can't seem to even get the point.
You're an idiot. Voldemort, hands down.
Actaully yea. I mean all you have to do apparently is be a Harry Potter conspiracy theory with a non canon book, and have no hand in making the books or movies and bingo your qualified.
You can't either. It's all opinion. If your so confident you can prove the Shield charm was better show me your proof.
Quan you are an idiot, we know that, no need to continue insulting yourself. 😂
Still no proof, all you've done is rant, while everyone here as slapped down every argument you had over and over and over again.
Originally posted by EmperorSidious2Her opinion has to do with the film. Weighted opinion.
Actaully yea. I mean all you have to do apparently is be a Harry Potter conspiracy theory with a non canon book, and have no hand in making the books or movies and bingo your qualified.You can't either. It's all opinion. If your so confident you can prove the Shield charm was better show me your proof.
Quan you are an idiot, we know that, no need to continue insulting yourself. 😂
Still no proof, all you've done is rant, while everyone here as slapped down every argument you had over and over and over again.
Concession accepted.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Her opinion has to do with the film. Weighted opinion.Concession accepted.
It doesn't matter if it was in the film or not. What matters is the substance. She had no hand in making the books or the movies, no hand in any canon source for Harry Potter, no hand in aiming anything legal here. All of what she said is simply her opinion, it's not weighted to the point it can be sued in thei debate, and doesn't give a decisive win to either one even in a debate where everything is accepted.
Yes yours is. Your concession has been accepted since the first page we debated this.