John McClane vs Eli (Book of Eli)

Ahhh well done, Quanchi..you've just killed Lesty's thread that he put so much rage and both seconds of kneejerk thoughtless goonery into by pointing out that McClane is in 5 movies,(6 including 'Loaded Weapon 1'😉 whereas the good lord gave Eli only one, due to his not being nowhere near as good as McClane.

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's like Bruce Willis really needs the money. To continue to demean this character in such a manner. I feel bad for the McClane diehards(by diehards I mean deluded). You know who.

Prejudging the movie out of analwounds related spite...poor soul, revealing your desperation to one day have a point.
A bit totally hilarious though. 🙂

Do keep up the cursory and cacophonously crude and complacent crud, O' conceited and cognitively challenged colossus of concussive colonic collision calamity.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
I look forward to that.

Lesty did real well by all accounts, looks like it should get at least 4.5 Kleenexs out of 5, judging by the trailer.

Well, the ratings are measured in Preparation H tubes, not Kleenexes.

Even though the anal cream icons are used, it is a two tiered* ratings system.

*See what I did there? 😉

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Ahhh well done, Quanchi..you've just killed Lesty's thread that he put so much rage and both seconds of kneejerk thoughtless goonery into by pointing out that McClane is in 5 movies,(6 including 'Loaded Weapon 1'😉 whereas the good lord gave Eli only one, due to his not being nowhere near as good as McClane.

Prejudging the movie out of analwounds related spite...poor soul, revealing your desperation to one day have a point.
A bit totally hilarious though. 🙂

Do keep up the cursory and cacophonously crude and complacent crud, O' conceited and cognitively challenged colossus of concussive colonic collision calamity.

Nope he doesnt.

How many movies was Eli in, roadtested? One?
How many has McClane survived every form of attack/danger in? 5 (6 including Loaded Weapon 1) you say?

LULZ

Your argument makes no sense, troll. Try again, or go play with your crayons

Its about validation.

McClane is more tried and tested. He wins.
I can't. (Cause the crayons are all up your arse.)

"Validation" 😂 what obvious crap. It's just like the Bobby Lee Swagger vs Agent 47 thread when RJ said that Swagger shooting down a helicopter (which had nothing to do with the thread; your hypocritical trolling ass pointed it out ) proved his "tenacity", when it obviously didn't mean shit.

Your argument is retarded, and you are a hypocritical troll. Try again, and use logic this time, kiddo.

Nope. Its not, idiot. 🙂

Tried and testedness has NOTHING do with what you just said.

It has nothing to do with the thread scenario (or any thread scenario) either, idiot 😉 . It's meaningless.
Sorry sport, how many tries is that? You'll get it one of these days.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Ahhh well done, Quanchi..you've just killed Lesty's thread that he put so much rage and both seconds of kneejerk thoughtless goonery into by pointing out that McClane is in 5 movies,(6 including 'Loaded Weapon 1'😉 whereas the good lord gave Eli only one, due to his not being nowhere near as good as McClane.

Prejudging the movie out of analwounds related spite...poor soul, revealing your desperation to one day have a point.
A bit totally hilarious though. 🙂

Do keep up the cursory and cacophonously crude and complacent crud, O' conceited and cognitively challenged colossus of concussive colonic collision calamity.

your stupidity should be studied. Your logic is of the nature that since Harry Potter survived his entire series while Dumbledore didn't make it into the last two that Harry is greater in a one on one fight. It's sheer stupidity.

Even McClane would be appalled by your fanboyism.

Nothing like an intentional spite thread that blew up in the haters' faces to draw out the tears and butthurt.

/Good stuff; carry on

Originally posted by Robtard
Nothing like an intentional spite thread that blew up in the haters' faces to draw out the tears and butthurt.

/Good stuff; carry on

Originally posted by quanchi112
As I see you don't even know what a spite thread even is. A spite thread means the opposition has no chance. It'd be like a Doctor Manhattan vs. McClane thread. This is a matchup you feel he loses so you cry spite while only outing the fact you don't even know what spite means.

Oh my. Lestov made it with the premise that Eli can't lose due to God protecting him, he said as much on the first page. That's an intentional spite thread.

Stop embarrassing yourself, okay?

Originally posted by Robtard
Oh my. Lestov made it with the premise that Eli can't lose due to God protecting him, he said as much on the first page. That's an intentional spite thread.

Stop embarrassing yourself, okay?

Originally posted by quanchi112
He has the same gifts and talents from the movie. You crying about McClane losing against someone who has the same skills he had in the movie is embarrassing. Eli isn't unbeatable.

Yet another strawman: I didn't say Eli doesn't get what he's shown.

The issue you're crying about now: This is a spite thread, as Lestov confirmed he had the ''God's protecting Eli' clause when he made the thread.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yet another strawman: I didn't say Eli doesn't get what he's shown.

The issue you're crying about now: This is a spite thread, as Lestov confirmed he had the ''God's protecting Eli' clause when he made the thread.

If you're just going to continue to switch immediate topics each time you're proven wrong and follow it up with a strawman tactic, I don't see the point.

Originally posted by Robtard
If you're just going to continue to switch immediate topics each time you're proven wrong and follow it up with a strawman tactic, I don't see the point.

Are your arms tired yet from beating up those strawmen you keep making?