Voldemort vs. Ganondorf (Twilight Princess)

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. And again you're off track, making nonsensical arguments that have nothing to do with anything. Prove AK is more powerful than love.
2. Oh, was he the same writer who went out of his way to include physics in Zelda? 🙂 Or are you, again, trying to use separate fiction to prove a point that cannot be proven with separate fiction?
3. So you can't cite even one time. Concession accepted.

2. No, they didn't. Game does all kinds of tooney nonsensical things.

3. Executioner sword. 🙂

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. Love can't kill you while av can. Love or self sacrifice can counter but you also die. LOL.

2. No, they didn't. Game does all kinds of tooney nonsensical things.

3. Executioner sword. 🙂

2. Prove it.

3. So, again, you can't provide an example?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste

3. Show me one time it's parried by a sword other than the one Ganondorf himself wields.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. K, now prove that AK is stronger than love, all you did was post inconclusive and largely irrelevant thoughts.

2. Prove it.

3. So, again, you can't provide an example?

2. So you haven't played the game. Cool.

3. Parries Dorf's sword.

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. I already did. Av can kill you love can't. Love can counter it if you die in the process. LOL.

2. So you haven't played the game. Cool.

3. Parries Dorf's sword.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. This does not prove it's more powerful, it just proves it has different uses.
2. So you can't cite an example, again, concession accepted.
3. So you're reusing an invalid example? You slow?

2. You haven't played the game and it's awful.

3. Their swords clash and parry in the final battle. He can parry you quite easily too I might add but then again you haven't played hence your begging for info.

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. Proves its more powerful since it kills you. Love can't kill you. Love might counter it but you also die yourself.

2. You haven't played the game and it's awful.

3. Their swords clash and parry in the final battle. He can parry you quite easily too I might add but then again you haven't played hence your begging for info.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. So again, different uses.
2. Right, I can only cite everything that occurs in it on a whim because I'm psychic.
3. Again, an invalid example. You claimed the MS can be parried by normal swords, the Sage's sword is not a normal sword, hence disqualifying it from your own claim, and not being relevant. So, again, cite one example.

2. You keep begging for scraps of info.
3. What proof do you have the sages sword is extraordinary ?

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. One is powerful enough to kill you whereas one isn't. That's power. Love it seems is a counter but only when you have to do die in order to do so.

2. You keep begging for scraps of info.
3. What proof do you have the sages sword is extraordinary ?

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. One isn't used to kill. Herp.
2. I'm calling you on your shit, you can't provide proof for anything you claim.
3. The fact that it for one holds up to a class 100+ sword lock, also it kind of glows and is transparent and visibly magical, being created by the sages who are very powerful themselves.

2.Yes, I can. You are just begging for information.

3. Unproven. Just because it stabs Dorf you want to claim it is out of fanboyism. You have no proof and it's always an everything is greater in this universe type of argument. Always the same with the fanboys.

1. No it doesn't.
2. Then provide proof of your claims, or continue to concede by default.
3. Proven, Link and Ganon's sword lock would have more force involved than a train wreck.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. No it doesn't.
2. Then provide proof of your claims, or continue to concede by default.
3. Proven, Link and Ganon's sword lock would have more force involved than a train wreck.

2. I already have.

3. False. Fanboy physics. Dorf is embarrassing and dies rather unspectacularly.

Originally posted by quanchi112
1. Killing shows more power than love. Based on your logic love is more powerful than a shotgun blast. LOL.

2. I already have.

3. False. Fanboy physics. Dorf is embarrassing and dies rather unspectacularly.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. In the HPverse it may very well be more powerful than a shotgun.
2. No, you haven't.
3. Ohlook, Quan's ignoring feats again.

2. Yes, I have.

3. No, he is easily impaleable.

I don't have to prove it, since I didn't claim AK is stronger, prove AK is stronger.

K, quote the post with the evidence.

When he was still human he could be impaled, big shock.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
I don't have to prove it, since I didn't claim AK is stronger, prove AK is stronger.

K, quote the post with the evidence.

When he was still human he could be impaled, big shock.

2. You are being silly.

He was impaled by Link as well. I knew you didn't play the game.

1. This only proves different uses, not power.
2. K, so you admit you didn't post evidence, concession accepted.

Link is class 100 with a planetary level magic sword, that is not 'easily' impaled, Midna tried and blew up a castle without so much as harming Ganondorf.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. This only proves different uses, not power.
2. K, so you admit you didn't post evidence, concession accepted.

Link is class 100 with a planetary level magic sword, that is not 'easily' impaled, Midna tried and blew up a castle without so much as harming Ganondorf.

I have many times you dance like a clown everytime I do.

Nonsense. I have already disproven this gear dependent weak ass sword theories wrong many times.

That doesn't prove power. Why would love kill? It's love.

Quote with evidence.

No, you haven't, you've plugged your ears and ignored the multiple feats that prove you wrong.

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
That doesn't prove power. Why would love kill? It's love.

Quote with evidence.

No, you haven't, you've plugged your ears and ignored the multiple feats that prove you wrong.

I already have provided you are just being a troll.

No, I have explained why these feats do not pass go.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Power kills and is a tangible indicator of power unlike love.

I already have provided you are just being a troll.

No, I have explained why these feats do not pass go.

I can't believe it's come to this, but prove that you provided evidence. You claim you have, but you haven't, and continue not to do so.

You've explained only that you don't accept them, which is worth nothing as they are canon.