Originally posted by quanchi112
They had already tied him up and tried to kill him. His inability to do anything past his first attack is the reason they banished him. Dorf was one of the shittiest end guys since he got beat three times in one game. Tom gets the victory due to his quicker reflexes, magical power, and killing curse.You can't attach a no limits fallacy to this sword. Only a zelda fan would say something so blatantly fanboyish like this. This is what makes me pity the entire Zelda brigade. It is statements like these which make me feel sorry for you.
Dorf was humiliated by being their prisoner. Even more so after the triforce of power favored him and he was still beaten despite the mega amp.
Then please quit conceding to me.
Now who ever said the sages tied him up? The sages are there to execute him, not do battle with him. So its because of a decisional choice not to engage defenceless, passive acting beings which means nothing.
Miscommunication. I don't mean that a single touch will instantly destroy anything evil, but it is more effective on them.
I take it you can show me how he was captured? Please do. And come now, youre going to chalk up his loss when the Master Sword was made to defeat someone in his position?
Find me the quote where I say "I concede to your argument" on anything I'm not admitting to :T
Originally posted by quanchi112
Dorf was already beaten without the sword. The sword just resisted the triforce's attempts to bring him back or resist death which only worked once anyway. Just anti magic to evil and power. No big deal and this type of thing occurs in fiction all the time.I never said it did. Summoning the portal shows Dorf's slow reaction time during a conflict. Voldemort would have ample time to send a lot of powerful attacks his way or the killing curse which would end him in a blast.
Soo you agree that it does repel evil powers?
Alright, sharing time again. Tom's standing there and a wall in front of him lights up. At what part does his reactions allow him to know that a portal is forming behind him? At what point does he choose to kill all of the sages instantaneously when they're not attacking him and are shaking in fear?.. Actually no, we know he would do the same thing Dorf did. HPGoF, resurrection scene, Tom talks to Harry, plays with Harry and then finally goes to kill Harry. OotP (or somewhere with the white floor) when Tom beats Harry he simply stands over him talking, and before he finishes him off he gets distracted. Tom's not always in 'auto kill all' mode either.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I think we can leave this be since you agree he's far weaker without the mega amp the triforce gives him.
As long as you can admit pre-ToP Dorf has nothing to do with this.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Different versions of Dorf with different histories so no it's not in character for this Dorf making your comments irrelevant.I said he can with his own easily reflectable magic but not all magic. It's on you to prove it but like I said it isn't in character anyway while he is in his own body. He only does so while possessing Zelda.
If a solid beam hits the other solid beam of energy then yes. This isn't an example of avada kedavra save the special circumstances in GOF which are irrelevant to Dorf. You need proof of it or him doing so in his own body. You don't have any proof thus you have no choice but to concede.
Yeah its in character, its not my fault you can't accept things. Ive already given the proof; magic explodes on contact so isnt some bouncy spell, Dorf > Zelda in every single way, Zelda had no magic powers at that time besides what Dorf was so no reason she could do anything, other weaker Dorfs have done so..
..now prove its easily reflectable magic when it explodes on contact with anything else. Prove its only Zelda's body that can do this when Dorf has everything Zelda has and more.. same sword, physically stronger, greater magical potency, far better control of powers.. Provide some reasons for you claims for once instead of just giving the most basic, weak answers of 'nah, don't count'. I even asked you for your solid reasoning before.
So it 'can' be deflected? All I needed.
Originally posted by quanchi112
So you don't have any proof Link's sword is special and can block magic but you just say so because well you are a fanboy. It's the master sword(planetary magic, insert other ridiculous hyperbole).We aren't arguing the books here so again quit bringing up this sort of material because it is irrelevant. It won't kill the sword but it will damage it even by your own logic you agree.
"don't have any proof Link's sword is special" Yes, the Master Sword is a common hunk of metal.. no magical powers or stated repelling abilities at all 😐 I don't care about whatever planet thing or hyperbole youre talking about, the sword is stated to repel evil and has been shown to do so, being proof to its clam... as youve admitted a few moments ago.
The Master Sword repels/blocks magic and energy attacks (attacks from several characters, was even able to absorb and charge up from a lightning bolt), destroys barriers and protects the user from magic spells like curses. Farore's Flame made it "twice its original strength" of the Goddess Sword, which was already stronger than a normal sword. Din's Flame further increased its strength and sacred light, and the final Goddess blessing further increased that.
Normal sword < Goddess Sword < w/Farore < w/Din < w/Goddess blessing. That and using move like the Great Spin coats it in a magic damaging light. Its a powerful magical and physical blade, more if youre evil.
Of course, cause the real canon would weaken your side right? Prove it can damage the sword then, don't just give your opinion on the matter. I know for a fact that it wont seeing as it bounces of statues.
Originally posted by quanchi112
In the books he is gay but you have no proof the directors even covered this or gave it serious thought. The movies and books aren't all the same. So you'd need to prove it. It is something the movies didn't address but the books did. That's all.No, his lack of experience and his lack of power also make this embarrassing for Dorf. Dorf has the most powerful plot device backing him in this game yet Link beats him with a weapon which can kill him. The weapon doesn't make Link able to that's his skill and what not. Link just beats him and Dorf can't resist death like he normally does. It shows how weak Dorf is despite all the triforce of power does for him.
So youre going to ignore every lore that didnt pop up in the film, even if its canon to the verse. Why are you always against what a fictions creator states?
Just had to read through the fan-hate to get to the relevant part. "It shows how weak Dorf is despite all the triforce of power does for him" Yes Im sure it shows he's weak when he and the ToP lose to the one weapon that was made to defeat someone like him with the Triforce.. Its like you don't read. Thats like saying a vampire is weak for losing to fire. Of course they're going to lose to their weaknesses.
And even if you were right here, it still has nothing to do with this fight unless you want to give Tom the Master Sword.
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, in Hp the characters are far greater than the characters in Zelda. The wizards and the various creatures are far more impressive and intelligent than the characters from Zelda.
Like I said, impressive by HP standards. Means nothing here. Though besides Tom, Albus, maybe one or two other wizards on that level and probably a those fierce dragons (not the wimp ones), what else? LoZ still has a bunch of Gorons who can punch room sized rocks about, Shadow Beasts who can tank bombs and one-shot anyone here, or the rain of arrows theyll receive, aerial assault from flying beasts, skelleton knights, intangible ghosts.. even massive things like that skeleton dragon. even for the monsters.
Originally posted by quanchi112
I won't read the OOT Link due to not beating it despite being at the end. Don't ruin this for me and drop all references to OOT. Link can't overpower them without having them on.It just shows you can't hit him with an arrow and have to fight him with your sword. That's it. Only a fanboy would try to make something out of this.
Being ignorant to save face? Clicking that link and reading what I posted there and before gives solid proof that the Ganondorf in the child era of OoT is the exact same person as the Ganondorf in TP. Now you're admitting to ignoring facts.
Urm, yeah he can. You fight Gorons on death mountain without the boots, just the sword. You should know this if you've played the game.
"you can't hit him with an arrow" yeah that was kinda my point, but thanks for saying it again? Anyhow seeing as set animations that always happen > taking damage in gameplay, if you want to ignore the arrows then there goes that 'anyone can hurt Link' argument. Just like in WW, and just like in the Ganon fight right before, Ganondorf can dodge arrows.
Face it, your made HP stronger by ignoring things in the books like how AK fails on inanimate objects, then you gimp TP by ignoring its history and lore and then throwing your personal 'portrayals' around which funnily enough only effect your oppositions side. Why is it you think the HP verse is superior to the TP verse when you strengthen the formers side and limit the latter?