Originally posted by Lestov16
C- you think calling somebody a woman is an insult, which means you think being a woman is an insult, in which case, you're a misogynist.
nope. you dont get to redefine this one. you are continuing to call yourself a woman and its deliciously funny. 🙂
mi·sog·y·nist:noun: A woman hater.
Adjective: Reflecting or inspired by a hatred of women.
Synonyms: womanhater - woman-hater
sorry lestovd
Originally posted by Lestov16
The only reason he was so reckless and overeager was because he was monomaniacally obsessed with killing the dragons which destroyed humanity. He is not going to have the same blind rage obsession with a woodchipper, I'm sorry.If you can prove he put himself in a non-dragon related suicidal position at any point in Reign of Fire I will take back everything i said. As it stands, you can't prove he'll have the same reaction to a woodchipper that he did to a dragon. Thus forth, you lose, and your butthurt (and about 80 lbs of pure back fat) are horribly (and disgustingly) exposed once again.
Um, it's a Vs Match. The Wood-chipper would be the focal point of his anger here. If we take that away, then matches where it's two heroes wouldn't likely happen on those same grounds.
That's eerily similar to the nonsense "only exactly like" type of arguments we often see. eg "Precuit Vader only Force choked Padme, so he can only Force choke Padme".
Originally posted by Lestov16
Fine. I'm a woman. I used to be a man but I'm transgender so I'm a woman now. Now tell me why it's an insult for me to be a woman
Its not. And we are very pleased for you Liz.
It must have been tough.
Now explain why you take that stance at Focus, yet wailed on McClane for "losing" to a woman in the negative for all that time, (despite the fact he kicked her ass, KO'd her and killed her after that..) Be a smart lady. Not a hypocritcal one.
Aside from that though, hope you're happy and find peace in your new life. Respect for (ironically) having the balls coming out announcing that.
Originally posted by Silent MasterIt speaks a lot more for Quinn's durability that he withstood that fight (and we see earlier that he is strong, mining stone with a pickaxe, and has a muscular physique, so he's not weak by any standard) and it's blatantly obvious that Van Zan would have won had the fight not been broken up. You can't say Van Zan didn't win the fight when he was clearly on the winning side until it was interrupted.
How does not being able to win a fight make him bada$$?
Originally posted by Robtard
Um, it's a Vs Match. The Wood-chipper would be the focal point of his anger here. If we take that away, then matches where it's two heroes wouldn't likely happen on those same grounds.That's eerily similar to the nonsense "only exactly like" type of arguments we often see. eg "Precuit Vader only Force choked Padme, so he can only Force choke Padme".
Or, Data only broke the neck of a Borg, so he can only break the necks of the Borg.
Originally posted by Robtard
Um, it's a Vs Match. The Wood-chipper would be the focal point of his anger here. If we take that away, then matches where it's two heroes wouldn't likely happen on those same grounds.That's eerily similar to the nonsense "only exactly like" type of arguments we often see. eg "Precuit Vader only Force choked Padme, so he can only Force choke Padme".
And I like that you're using the 'you're a fatty' jabs I used on Quanchi long ago back at me 🙂
In that case Van Zan destroys it with an explosive arrow and leaves. Is Van Zan too stupid to try the arrows now, or will the woodchipper somehow be able to defend itself? 😂
No it's not. He killed himself via dragon because he had a lifelong obsession with dragons and only dragons. He isn't going to focus his lifelong obsession towards a woodchipper, and even if he does, as I said, he will launch an explosive arrow at it first, as his screen feats dictate, and thus adios Chipper.
Originally posted by Lestov16
It speaks a lot more for Quinn's durability that he withstood that fight (and we see earlier that he is strong, mining stone with a pickaxe, and has a muscular physique, so he's not weak by any standard) and it's blatantly obvious that Van Zan would have won had the fight not been broken up. You can't say Van Zan didn't win the fight when he was clearly on the winning side until it was interrupted.
Do you think that Quinn would have been in the same condition if instead of Zan, his fight was against Uri Boyka, human Thor, Jeff Sanders, Casey Bowman, Frank Martin or Martin Riggs?
Originally posted by Lestov16
In that case Van Zan destroys it with an explosive arrow and leaves. Is Van Zan too stupid to try the arrows now, or will the woodchipper somehow be able to defend itself? 😂No it's not. He killed himself via dragon because he had a lifelong obsession with dragons and [b]only
dragons. He isn't going to focus his lifelong obsession towards a woodchipper, and even if he does, as I said, he will launch an explosive arrow at it first, as his screen feats dictate, and thus adios Chipper. [/B]
Does he have an explosive arrow and crossbow? None was named in the OP, adding things/making tweaks a few post in is allowed, but we're on page 82, bro. Ate-E-Too
Then on those same grounds, your Reacher Vs Mills thread is defunct. Those two guys wouldn't fight, one guy was after the thugs who kidnapped his daughter and the other guy was after what he views as justice, they'd have no hate towards each other. Same goes for many of your threads. Mills Vs Martin. Won't fly. Riggs Vs Mills. Sorry, not by the rules you're trying to implement now. You're trying to have your cake and eat it too, but I just slapped the fork out your lips.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Do you think that Quinn would have been in the same condition if instead of Zan, his fight was against Uri Boyka, human Thor, Jeff Sanders, Casey Bowman, Frank Martin or Martin Riggs?
Do you think that Quinn would have been in the same condition if instead of Zan, his fight was against Roger "Verbal" Kint/Keyser Soze, a confirmed badass with no combat feats whatsoever? "Badass" isn't just being able to fight like a demigod.
Originally posted by Lestov16
Do you think that Quinn would have been in the same condition if instead of Zan, his fight was against Roger "Verbal" Kint/Keyser Soze, a confirmed badass with no combat feats whatsoever? "Badass" isn't just being able to fight like a demigod.
spoken like a true master of nonsensical rhetoric.
is that to be your baseless arbitrary definition of "badass" for the hour?
"Keyser Soze"?
Originally posted by Robtard
Does he have an explosive arrow and crossbow? None was named in the OP, adding things/making tweaks a few post in is allowed, but we're on page 82, bro. Ate-E-TooThen on those same grounds, your Reacher Vs Mills thread is defunct. Those two guys wouldn't fight, one guy was after the thugs who kidnapped his daughter and the other guy was after what he views as justice, they'd have no hate towards each other. Same goes for many of your threads. Mills Vs Martin. Won't fly. Riggs Vs Mills. Sorry, not by the rules you're trying to implement now. You're trying to have your cake and eat it too, but I just slapped the fork out your lips.
What's to stop him from turning the woodchipper off? He won't resort to suicide as a first resort, as proven by the explosive arrow, so what's to stop him from walking over to the woodchipper and pressing the off switch? Do you have onscreen feats of Van Zan being illiterate?
fine he focuses his all his attention on the woodchipper. He turns it off. Prove he doesn't. Prove he resorts to suicide as a first resort. Bring these screen captures of him resorting to suicide as a first resort at any instance, including the end where he attempted the arrow first. And if you're going to say he won't turn off the woodchipper, prove he is too stupid to read "on" and "off". Otherwise, choke on the words I shoved down your your esophagus 🙂