Originally posted by DARTH POWERYou said xmen days of future past was unquestionably better. I disagree as do many others. Box office dollars also greatly disagrees.
I never said it wasn't Loser. Contrary to what goes on in your head I do love The Avengers, Iron Man 1, Cap 2 and Thor 1.All I agreed to was the acting quality was better in DOFP than Avengers. And I'm not alone there Troll.
😂
Originally posted by 80sBaby
Beast was a side-character, at best, and Mystique was important to the plot but she's a villain, not an X-man. And was only slightly more developed (where'd she learn to fight like that, again?) The only people given focus were Xavier, Erik, Raven and Logan. That's piss poor for a film about a team.
I'd say Beast had a pretty decent role tbh. His initial encounter with Logan and his saving of Mystique from Magneto were definitely key moments in the film. He was also shown to be Xavier's right hand man, and his super intelligence proved to be helpful a few times.
The actual "X-Men" on the 1973 team only consisted of Charles, Logan and Hank. And I honestly think they all got their fair share.
Then you have Quicksilver. Even though he only had a few scenes and isn't officially one of the X-Men yet, he was clearly the big highlight of the movie in terms of introduction of new mutants and mutant powers.
But yeah I agree with you that in the future scenes the only main character was Prof. X really, but with Kitty and Logan obviously being involved in the main plot. The rest of them were all just defending him, Logan and Kitty. But I honestly thought it was cool having lots of different mutants using their powers to fight off the sentinels, without having to give us a backstory and character arc for each one of them.
Originally posted by quanchi112
You said xmen days of future past was unquestionably better. I disagree as do many others. Box office dollars also greatly disagrees.😂
Again quote me where I said that, or stop the Trolling. Oh wait... You can't. Your the Troll of KMC after all.
FYI I agreed the acting was unquestionably better DOFP than in Avengers. And I don't really see anyone arguing the acting was actually better in the Avengers apart from you.
So you just keep hiding your fanboyism behind "box office dollars." But when you do that, just remember MOS made more "box office dollars" than both the Marvel powerhouses Thor and Hulk 😂
Originally posted by DARTH POWERAgain, I proved your hypocritical, ignorant statement wrong about xmen day of future being superior in a purely subjective discussion.
Again quote me where I said that, or stop the Trolling. Oh wait... You can't. Your the Troll of KMC after all.FYI I agreed the acting was unquestionably better DOFP than in Avengers. And I don't really see anyone arguing the acting was actually better in the Avengers apart from you.
So you just keep hiding your fanboyism behind "box office dollars." But when you do that, just remember MOS made more "box office dollars" than both the Marvel powerhouses Thor and Hulk 😂
Box office, sport. Read 'em and weep.
Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Again quote me where I said that, or stop the Trolling. Oh wait... You can't. Your the Troll of KMC after all.FYI I agreed the acting was unquestionably better DOFP than in Avengers. And I don't really see anyone arguing the acting was actually better in the Avengers apart from you.
So you just keep hiding your fanboyism behind "box office dollars." But when you do that, just remember MOS made more "box office dollars" than both the Marvel powerhouses Thor and Hulk 😂
MOS better make more money then thor, minus a few comic book freaks out there Thor is a virtually unkown household name. In all honesty MOS did crap considering how well known superman is and how long the character has been around. Considering how unkown thor really is in America it did pretty good. 😉
Originally posted by zeel👆
MOS better make more money then thor, minus a few comic book freaks out there Thor is a virtually unkown household name. In all honesty MOS did crap considering how well known superman is and how long the character has been around. Considering how unkown thor really is in America it did pretty good. 😉
He's a dc troll/fanboy.
Originally posted by zeel
MOS better make more money then thor, minus a few comic book freaks out there Thor is a virtually unkown household name. In all honesty MOS did crap considering how well known superman is and how long the character has been around. Considering how unkown thor really is in America it did pretty good. 😉
MOS isn't part of the Avengers franchise, and Thor has a larger movie audience after Avengers.
Sure, he was relatively obscure before, but now? God no.
MOS did fine.
Originally posted by Firefly218
Superman is still a much more familiar brand. Many audiences don't even realize Thor is in the MCU
And a lot of people are. So much so that it brings people in.
Superman has a history of bad movies (the last three before MOS were panned pretty harshly), and is a very, very big departure from the preconceptions people would have of the character when they've only seen the Reeve movies or Smallville.
And MOS still made it's budget back what, three times over? That's not bad at all.
Originally posted by quanchi112
👆He's a dc troll/fanboy.
Box Office is the only Objective thing here. MOS made more than both Thor movies and both Hulk movies 😂 And Hulk is a really famous name, whilst Thor is an actual legend. Keep crying about it Troll.
Originally posted by zeel
MOS better make more money then thor, minus a few comic book freaks out there Thor is a virtually unkown household name. In all honesty MOS did crap considering how well known superman is and how long the character has been around. Considering how unkown thor really is in America it did pretty good. 😉
Urrmm, that didn't stop both IM3 and CAP2 making more money than MOS. Avengers has given all those superheroes huge hype and a great fanbase, whilst Superman pre-MOS was getting a bad name due to the crap that was Superman Returns. Plus Thor 2 had the popularity of both Thor and Loki going for it as well as a huge boost from the Avengers.
But fact is Powerhouses like Thor and Superman can be harder to handle on the big screen than the less powerful heroes like IM, Cap, Spider-Man and Batman.
Already top grossing X-Men movie of all time and first to hit the $500mill mark.
http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/box-office-milestone-x-men-708521
Should pass the $700mill mark WW by the end of it's run. And if it does X-Men will once again be one of the major superhero movie franchises.