Originally posted by Robtard
Quan's so used to getting proved wrong by me that he now has a Pavlovian-like reaction to accuse other posters who prove him wrong of being my "second account". You're probably the 27th poster he's done this too, he's weird and is also poor at math.
eight year olds usally are
Originally posted by quanchi112
No, I explained the context in which you lied about. I am always honest about the context. You not so much.It didn't almost kill him since he took precautions as to ensure his immortality.
So as a youth he killed kids around his own age before he became Voldemort. 😂
He was able to kill since he killed at the beginning of the film with the Avada Kedavra. He was able and thus didn't kill a child but you claimed it anyways. 😂
Being a child killer means you have killed children as an adult. Give me an example and don't lie next time, dummy.
I didn't lie about any context because I stated exactly what happens on screen. He gets bested (not KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed) in each film, and his influence is stopped for the time being. Like in Freddy VS Jason. So he blinked in the end. Fact is, he tried to kill those teens. They outsmarted him, pulled him into the real world, decapitated him, and survived to the end of the film. So he was bested by them. Again, NOT KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed. I never went into any deeper detail. So you claiming I lied about context is another lie of yours. And I was referring to your MoS posts and other lies, dumbass. Like your PTSD nonsense, for example. Or you constantly using the "civilised" comment Riddick makes in his last film to lowball, while totally ignoring the rest of the comment, or the fact that he spends an unknown time after that getting back to his "animal" side. If you had more brains, you'd realise that I was referring to your lie of a claim that you don't lie in other threads.
And yes, it did ALMOST kill him, by the fact that he was basically a disembodied spirit for roughly a decade. Being unkillable doesn't change the fact that it brought him to a near death state. Or are you actually saying that someone who almost dies and gets near the point of death, didn't actually almost die or get near the point of death, because they didn't die? Riiiiiiiiiight.
As to the child killer thing, commanding Wormtail (basically using him as a tool), to kill Cedric still lands the death at his feet. And the several attempts at trying to kill a child Harry shows that he would have been a child killer because of that too, if he had been more competent. And, it's been a while since I watched the films (which is why I admittedly forgot about the Avada Kadavra at the beginning of the film, but considering I am talking to Orca tooth guy, glass houses and stones and all that), but I know for a fact there is a moment in the Deathly Hallows book where Harry has a vision of Voldemort killing two German children and a woman, while on his search for the Elder wand. So ok... I will change my statement, Voldemort is a wannabe-child-killer-failure. Does that sound better to you?
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
I didn't lie about any context because I stated exactly what happens on screen. He gets bested (not KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed) in each film, and his influence is stopped for the time being. Like in Freddy VS Jason. So he blinked in the end. Fact is, he tried to kill those teens. They outsmarted him, pulled him into the real world, decapitated him, and survived to the end of the film. So he was bested by them. Again, NOT KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed. I never went into any deeper detail. So you claiming I lied about context is another lie of yours. And I was referring to your MoS posts and other lies, dumbass. Like your PTSD nonsense, for example. Or you constantly using the "civilised" comment Riddick makes in his last film to lowball, while totally ignoring the rest of the comment, or the fact that he spends an unknown time after that getting back to his "animal" side. If you had more brains, you'd realise that I was referring to your lie of a claim that you don't lie in other threads.And yes, it did ALMOST kill him, by the fact that he was basically a disembodied spirit for roughly a decade. Being unkillable doesn't change the fact that it brought him to a [B]near
death state. Or are you actually saying that someone who almost dies and gets near the point of death, didn't actually almost die or get near the point of death, because they didn't die? Riiiiiiiiiight.As to the child killer thing, commanding Wormtail (basically using him as a tool), to kill Cedric still lands the death at his feet. And the several attempts at trying to kill a child Harry shows that he would have been a child killer because of that too, if he had been more competent. And, it's been a while since I watched the films (which is why I admittedly forgot about the Avada Kadavra at the beginning of the film, but considering I am talking to Orca tooth guy, glass houses and stones and all that), but I know for a fact there is a moment in the Deathly Hallows book where Harry has a vision of Voldemort killing two German children and a woman, while on his search for the Elder wand. So ok... I will change my statement, Voldemort is a wannabe-child-killer-failure. Does that sound better to you? [/B]
I actually agree 100% here...
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I actually agree 100% here...
Just because we wildly disagree in one thread doesn't mean we won't agree on others. I have honestly given up on that other thread, and think that we should just agree to disagree. Clearly we both have vastly different interpretations of what happens on screen, and do not see at all eye-to-eye with how the characters are portrayed.
So we can either accept that neither is going to convince the other of their point, and call it a day, or we can continue going in circles for another 20 pages, getting progressively more agitated with each other, and end up like Robtard and Quan.
And I come to this thread for amusement when I happen to be bored. Not to make enemies on the internet, because the person and I disagreed on a fictional battle between two movie characters. Now screwing with the Black Knight, Quan, on the other hand? That's just too much fun to stop.
Originally posted by TheVaultDweller
I didn't lie about any context because I stated exactly what happens on screen. He gets bested (not KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed) in each film, and his influence is stopped for the time being. Like in Freddy VS Jason. So he blinked in the end. Fact is, he tried to kill those teens. They outsmarted him, pulled him into the real world, decapitated him, and survived to the end of the film. So he was bested by them. Again, NOT KILLED, because dead people CANNOT be killed. I never went into any deeper detail. So you claiming I lied about context is another lie of yours. And I was referring to your MoS posts and other lies, dumbass. Like your PTSD nonsense, for example. Or you constantly using the "civilised" comment Riddick makes in his last film to lowball, while totally ignoring the rest of the comment, or the fact that he spends an unknown time after that getting back to his "animal" side. If you had more brains, you'd realise that I was referring to your lie of a claim that you don't lie in other threads.And yes, it did ALMOST kill him, by the fact that he was basically a disembodied spirit for roughly a decade. Being unkillable doesn't change the fact that it brought him to a [B]near
death state. Or are you actually saying that someone who almost dies and gets near the point of death, didn't actually almost die or get near the point of death, because they didn't die? Riiiiiiiiiight.As to the child killer thing, commanding Wormtail (basically using him as a tool), to kill Cedric still lands the death at his feet. And the several attempts at trying to kill a child Harry shows that he would have been a child killer because of that too, if he had been more competent. And, it's been a while since I watched the films (which is why I admittedly forgot about the Avada Kadavra at the beginning of the film, but considering I am talking to Orca tooth guy, glass houses and stones and all that), but I know for a fact there is a moment in the Deathly Hallows book where Harry has a vision of Voldemort killing two German children and a woman, while on his search for the Elder wand. So ok... I will change my statement, Voldemort is a wannabe-child-killer-failure. Does that sound better to you? [/B]
Dead people can be killed they just don't stay dead. Get your facts straight. Jason dies and then comes back as does Freddy in their own ways. Quite a few Freddy films end with him showing he wasn't defeated so you are wrong and selectively ignoring the history of the character and the ends of those films. Most of the teens died and they wanted to kill Freddy. He wasn't stopped so they failed as well. Dead people can be killed they just don't stay dead, sport.
I never ignored that about Riddick but I won't ignore his lack of skill in the film.
It didn't almost kill him as he had various Horcruxes ensuring he was immortal. Key plot point. I am saying the only way to kill him was to destroy the Horcruxes and his body.
He didn't kill him so Wormtail is the child killer. He wanted a Harry dead at all costs not because he was a child but due to the prophecy. Voldemort is a dark wizard who would stop at nothing to kill anyone he deems a threat. A child killer implies he enjoys killing children. That is Freddy not Voldemort so don't get it twisted.
That was an amazing argument and you loved every damn word from that epic post. Movies only, kiddo.
Originally posted by Genesis-SoldierI have evidence and don't lie about it. If you believe I have nothing agree to the terms.
you're bluffing, you have no evidence to begin with so you keep trying to keep the lie alive. much like the lie you tell children to get into your pedo van with the tear stained mattress in the back