Originally posted by jaden101
I never said it was too far fetched. I said it was too shit. Not in concept but in execution. It came across like it was written by a 14 year old who thinks that names like 'necromonger' are anything but laughably bad. The concept also didn't really fit with what seemed to be the logical next step in terms of the development of the characters in the wider 'universe'. The county hunters fit well as pitch black made me picture humanity being something like what you see in the Serenity/Firefly universe. Spread out, some planets more civilised than others. Then all of a sudden they throw in Necromongers and Furyans and Elementals and all sorts of bizarre tech and posh accents and Shakespearean treachery. Completely at odds with the tone of Pitch Black. It might've worked outwith the Riddick aspect as it's obviously allegorical to stories such as Moses and so could have been expanded to other religious which could have been interesting so like I say. The concept was interesting. The execution was poor.
I understand & respect your opinions. For me, the execution was fine & the expansion of Necormonger & Furyan myth & lore suited the film.
You think, "Necromonger" is laughingly bad, that's fine.
My counter point is Lucas coming up with silly names like Darth Maul, Han Solo, Jar Jar Binks & Mon Calamari.
Twohy gave us, The UnderVerse. Lucas gave us The Force.
Christ, how creative is naming something, The Force?
Riddick constantly on the run with bounty hunters after him is a good theme but like the Rocky movies, they would quickly become predictable following a set formula.
You might've found the Necros, Furyans & Elementals at odds with PB...but then again PB was a simple crash & survive tale...the audience was never meant to wonder what the rest of the universe was like beyond the planet. And if I was to take a wild guess, I would say that Twohy found more inspiration in novels/movies like Dune than Star Wars/Trek.