Imhotep vs Voldemort

Originally posted by KingD19
Sirius got hit with Avada Kedavra and fell through the Veil. The gateway between the living world and the spirit world. Other than that he would have just been dead. Like Cedric Diggory. Did we see his soul leave? Nope. Sure didn't. We only saw Sirius become a spirit because he fell through the veil. It took his physical body too.

There was no Horcux inside Harry. Harry was the Horcrux. And Voldie making an accidental Horcrux was a fluke due to the combination of his already fractured soul, Lily's protection, etc...

There's no evidence Avada Kedavra takes your soul. It kills you and your soul leaves your body after you die which happens to everyone who dies. Dumbledore. Snape. Cedric. Sirius. Everyone.

And as Imhotep is Immortal and Undead. And you can't use a killing spell on an undead being. AK being the be all end all is you wanking the the tip of Voldemort's wand yet again as you do in every thread ever of all time. You've got the nerve to call me a fanboy, hah. I bet if you met Voldemort's actor you'd blow your magical load.

There was a Horcrux in Harry with which Voldemort destroyed. Your ignorance is appalling. You have no Potter comprehension.

Wrong since it destroyed Horcrux in Harry.

Based on what can't you ? Forcing the soul to leave the body renders him mortal. Oneshot death.

You're pathetic. 😂

Originally posted by Robtard
First of all, prove that AV "takes the soul and then kills you". Cos the most famous AV death (Dumbledore's) didn't have this 'soul taking' you claim. He was hit; he died.

You're trying to force that AV is the same as the spell used in the book of Amon-Ra, which turned Imhotep mortal, it didn't kill him. So you fail still. Different spells do different things, you should know this being an HP fanatic. 😂

Did magic kill him? Kill magic harm him while he was immortal? No and no. So you have two more fail arguments you continue to try and sell.

/derp

Forcing the soul to leave the body renders him mortal. Two birds one stone.

Magic clearly works. Guy got depowered in every movie. He'd wreck anyone with a fun not magic. Facts. 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
So now your argument changes since another ignorant poster has challenged me. Ok, sidekick. Dumbledore's soul left we just don't see it aka unless they are in Veil.

Forcing the soul to leave the body renders him mortal. Two birds one stone.

Magic clearly works. Guy got depowered in every movie. He'd wreck anyone with a fun not magic. Facts. 😂

Are you dense? My argument is the same as it's always been, 'AV is not the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra.' 😂 Yet another claim you can't prove. Figures. Cry more.

Repeating fails is just that.You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it really matters here. You have yet to prove AV is the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra. Repeat: Different spells do different things.

A spell designed to take away Imhotep's immortality works, by making him mortal. AV doesn't do that, no matter how hard you cry. AV kills the living. ie "the killing curse". You should know this by now.

Avada Kedavra does not take the soul. The soul leaves the body when you die by any means. And the veil is what took Sirius. Notice his body didn't come out the other side. Hell, in the books it isn't even AK that hits him, it's just a spell that knocks him through the veil.

You have no proof it takes the soul. You also have no proof that Imhotep even has a soul as he is an undead cursed immortal mummy.

And there is no spell in HP to take away a beings immortality and make them mortal, which is exactly what the spells in Mummy 1 and 2 were designed to do. GTFO troll.

All the spells in HP, and AK and Crucio are the only one Vold's has at his disposal? Damn, Quan, you need to be creative.

Originally posted by Lestov16
All the spells in HP, and AK and Crucio are the only one Vold's has at his disposal? Damn, Quan, you need to be creative.

Originally posted by Robtard
Are you dense? My argument is the same as it's always been, 'AV is not the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra.' 😂 Yet another claim you can't prove. Figures. Cry more.

Repeating fails is just that.You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it really matters here. You have yet to prove AV is the same as the spell from the book of Amon-Ra. Repeat: Different spells do different things.

A spell designed to take away Imhotep's immortality works, by making him mortal. AV doesn't do that, no matter how hard you cry. AV kills the living. ie "the killing curse". You should know this by now.

In every case the soul is removed. Your case falls apart since it attacked Voldemort's soul inside Harry in last film. 😂

Imhotep is living he is immortal. Do you know what immortal means or did you forget again ?

Imhotep is an "Undead" Immortal as he is a mummy, which is classified as an undead being. Just like Inferi are immortal because they're undead. And Dementors. And Vampires.

Originally posted by KingD19
Avada Kedavra does not take the soul. The soul leaves the body when you die by any means. And the veil is what took Sirius. Notice his body didn't come out the other side. Hell, in the books it isn't even AK that hits him, it's just a spell that knocks him through the veil.

You have no proof it takes the soul. You also have no proof that Imhotep even has a soul as he is an undead cursed immortal mummy.

And there is no spell in HP to take away a beings immortality and make them mortal, which is exactly what the spells in Mummy 1 and 2 were designed to do. GTFO troll.

So despite all beings in Mummy verse having a soul he doesn't. Lol. You're a fanboy.

Oneshot death. Imhotep is only resistance to mortal weaponry. Voldemort easily.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I argue in character. He uses the Avada Kedavra more than any other spell. Game over for Imhotep. My arguing is consistent as others tend to jump all over the place unlike myself.

But AK might not work here. Remember when AK was used on the Phoenix, and the Phoenix withstood it because it was immortal. It may have the same effect on Tep

Originally posted by quanchi112
I never said it was the same. One only takes your soul while the other does so and kills you.

In every case the soul is removed. Your case falls apart since it attacked Voldemort's soul inside Harry in last film. 😂

Imhotep is living he is immortal.

Do you know what immortal means or did you forget again ?

You're insisting they're similar. They're two different spells. One kills you. One specically turns a certain immortal to mortal. Apples to oranges. So you fail again.

You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it matters here but it's funny seeing you dance. Could argue that killing Dumbledore with a gun would remove his soul. What do bullets do to Imhotep? Nothing. That's your argument. Nothing.

😂 watch the damn film, dummy. While in his immortal form he was undead. When he gets his arm cut off in the end, we see inside and it's dry, black and mummified still.

Page 7, I had to link you to the dictionary cos you didn't know what immortal means, remember. You fail consistently. "Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

Originally posted by Lestov16
But AK might not work here. Remember when AK was used on the Phoenix, and the Phoenix withstood it because it was immortal. It may have the same effect on Tep

Originally posted by Robtard
You're insisting they're similar. They're two different spells. One kills you. One specically turns a certain immortal to mortal. Apples to oranges. So you fail again.

You have yet to prove AV removes the soul, not that it matters here but it's funny seeing you dance. Could argue that killing Dumbledore with a gun would remove his soul. What do bullets do to Imhotep? Nothing. That's your argument. Nothing.

😂 watch the damn film, dummy. While in his immortal form he was undead. When he gets his arm cut off in the end, we see inside and it's dry, black and mummified still.

Page 7, I had to link you to the dictionary cos you didn't know what immortal means, remember. You fail consistently. "Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

Already proven it especially with the destruction of the Voldemort/Harry Potter one. You falsely compared Harry to object Horcruxes. Fool. 😂

Immortal means ability to live forever. Key word is live you simpleton.

A gun kills Harry it doesn't just take out Voldemort's soul specifically. Tool.

It's funny I'm the fanboy. When you argue solely for Voldemort, it doesn't matter if he's up against a full on blast from the Death Star or getting shot in the face.

And your last what, 3-5 av's and sigs have been nothing but HP and Voldemort. Yeah, I'm the fanboy here.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Both take away souls. One makes Imhotep able to die and the Avada Kedavra does both.

Already proven it especially with the destruction of the Voldemort/Harry Potter one. You falsely compared Harry to object Horcruxes. Fool. 😂

Immortal means ability to live forever. Key word is live you simpleton.

A gun kills Harry it doesn't just take out Voldemort's soul specifically. Tool.

Repeat: Have yet to prove AV "takes away the soul" and have yet to prove AV can mimic the spell from the book of Amon-Ra.

You've proven nothing. And a strawman. Good job.

Yeah, you still don't know what immortal means. Go back to page 7, i posted the description.

😂 You thought a mummy was alive and not undead, idiot. Watch the film again, then come back, you don't recall a thing about it.

You keep dropping gems in here:

"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂

Originally posted by quanchi112
Quit lashing out at everyone just because you live in a hut. It's already been proven, kiddo.

And you keep bringing up Imhotep who was immortal and was hurt by mortal weapons in this thread

so show us the proof or shut up.

Originally posted by Kazenji
And you keep bringing up Imhotep who was immortal and was hurt by mortal weapons in this thread

so show us the proof or shut up.

Voldemort is an immortal who uses magic. Clearly you don't comprehend much from your hut.

Originally posted by KingD19
It's funny I'm the fanboy. When you argue solely for Voldemort, it doesn't matter if he's up against a full on blast from the Death Star or getting shot in the face.

And your last what, 3-5 av's and sigs have been nothing but HP and Voldemort. Yeah, I'm the fanboy here.

Voldemort wins this thread. Just accept it and the pain will stop.

Originally posted by Robtard
Repeat: Have yet to prove AV "takes away the soul" and have yet to prove AV can mimic the spell from the book of Amon-Ra.

You've proven nothing. And a strawman. Good job.

Yeah, you still don't know what immortal means. Go back to page 7, i posted the description.

😂 You thought a mummy was alive and not undead, idiot. Watch the film again, then come back, you don't recall a thing about it.

You keep dropping gems in here:

"Immortality doesn't mean being immortal to death" - Quanchi112 😂

"Imhotep is living he is immortal." - Quanchi112 😂

Immortal clearly means the ability to live forever not unkillable. We've seen him killed twice now. 😂

Now resume crying due to Voldemort's win.

Originally posted by quanchi112
The Mummy (1999) - Greatest Films
www.filmsite.org/series-mummy.html
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor (2008). "The Mummy" Films - Part I. The Mummy (1999) d. ..... No mortal weapon can kill this creature. He's not of this ...

Fail.........

you clearly said

He's only unkillable per mortal weaponry

what you posted means squat diddly.